3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,978–3,989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 05:12
3,979
-6
8 Aug 2026, 18:58
3,985
-3
7 Aug 2026, 19:02
3,988
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 3,979 subscribers
Avg views / post
442
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.679%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held
17 (30 January 2026 – 23 July 2026)
Views total
442
Reactions total
3
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 16 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
72.0%
👍
17
22.7%
🤩
4
5.33%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Бартер для владельцев iPhone Air и iPhone 16 линейки!
Ищем авторов для сотрудничества с Acecase.
🎁 В подарок:
✔️ чехол;
✔️ защитное стекло.
Взамен:
📹 Reels или 📸 фото/карусель.
❗ Неважно, сколько у вас подписчиков. Главное — активный аккаунт и хороший контент.
Заполняйте анкету:
🔗 https://forms.gle/bZWGVffd8PebE2VT7
Ждем ваши заявки! 💛
ЛАК ДЛЯ ВОЛОС ТЕКСТУРАЙЗЕР
Бартер
◽️Что нужно сделать:
-Найти наш товар по запросу, дальше по инструкции
-Оставить отзыв
Для сотрудничества оставлять писать @vikatarasova77
СЫВОРОТКА ДЛЯ РОСТА ВОЛОС С РОЗМАРИНОМ
Бартер
◽️Что нужно сделать:
-Найти наш товар по запросу, дальше по инструкции
-Оставить отзыв
Для сотрудничества оставлять отклик в комментариях и писать @vikatarasova77
‼️Важно: обязательно скриншот с канала группы
МАСЛО ДЛЯ РОСТА БРОВЕЙ И РЕСНИЦ
Бартер
◽️Что нужно сделать:
-Найти наш товар по запросу, дальше по инструкции
-Оставить отзыв
Для сотрудничества оставлять отклик в комментариях и писать @vikatarasova77
‼️Важно: обязательно скриншот с канала группы
Наконец сердце 19LAB открыто для сотрудничества с блогерами из Instagram
Если ты давно искал бренд, который замечает не только миллионников — мы нашли друг друга.
Нам важны не цифры.
Нам важны люди, эстетика, энергия и твоя подача✨
Мы создали удобного бота для сотрудничества:
@pr19lab_bot
Теперь всё стало проще:
— без долгих ожиданий
— без сложных анкет
— без бесконечных переписок
🗂 Что нужно делать?
После подтв…
19LAB В ПОИСКЕ КРЕАТИВНЫХ БЛОГЕРОВ 🤍
Если ты давно искал бренд, который замечает не только миллионников — мы нашли друг друга.
Нам важны не цифры.
Нам важны люди, эстетика, энергия и твоя подача✨
Мы создали удобного бота для сотрудничества:
@pr19lab_bot
Теперь всё стало проще:
— без долгих ожиданий
— без сложных анкет
— без бесконечных переписок
📊 Соц. сети / охваты:
Рассматриваем любые площадки и любые охваты.
…
#бартер #наборнарекламу
Идет набор блогеров на рекламу спрея для объема волос компании Keltein на БАРТЕР
Ссылка на товар
https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/223337723/detail.aspx?targetUrl=MS&size=354326873
Необходимо сделать:
Видеоролик с рекомендацией
И ОСТАВИТЬ ОТЗЫВ НА ВБ
Реклама в ЛЮБОЙ соцсети: Инстаграм, ТИК ТОК, Ютуб, ТГ
ВОЗМОЖНО ПОВТОРНОЕ СОТРУДНИЧЕСТВО!
По вопросам писaть👇
https://www.instagram.com/…
Набор блогеров на рекламу с отзывом в карточке товара.
Красивые, эстетичные блоги от 1300 просмотров.
Товар: футболка.
Выкуп по ключу в определённый день.
Писать с ссылками на блоги https://t.me/Vitaliasukhareva
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @barter_secrets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BARTER SECRETS | БАРТЕР” (@barter_secrets), 3,979 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barter_secrets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.