Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for That same Bart

Channel

That same Bart

@bartart27

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

101subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002535591584
TypeChannel
Username@bartart27
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bartart27

Growth

101102101.59 August 2026 — 102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 102 subscribers10 September 2026 — 101 subscribers9 August 202610 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 32 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 101–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 05:55101-1
9 Aug 2026, 10:02102no change
9 Aug 2026, 00:01102first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥3218.3%
💩2614.9%
custom 52491570646383678292112.0%
custom 53416690495814672141910.9%
custom 5447391623782627142169.14%
custom 5091424266138682339148.00%
🍓126.86%
👍116.29%
🤔63.43%
custom 491150691358317075452.86%
👻52.86%
custom 589533862664811792742.29%
custom 524895977961059428231.71%
💘10.571%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
174
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 15 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bartart27. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Этооченькрасиво,недумаете?

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTC61 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Знаете, я иногда очень хочу открыть кмм хотя бы рублей за 100, но как понимаю с таким активом хер что будет🤔🤔. По факту за всё время только 1 норм коммишка была и то там заплатили дохера(За что больше спасибо кстати)

🍓6

5 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC62 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне лень доделывать

❤‍🔥8🍓3👍3custom 54473916237826271422

5 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC63 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Знаете, ночью градусов 25 и духнота совсем не круто, а ещё я продолжаю утверждаться что 100 пдп это проклятье для меня

🤔4custom 52491570646383678294

3 Aug 2026, 13:58 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54473916237826271426💩2

1 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC89 views10 reactions13 Starsread 9 August 2026

Думаю, новая ава будет лучше

❤‍🔥6👻2🤔2

31 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC94 views8 reactions100 Starsread 9 August 2026

Я ТГ в руки срал, за то что качество жрёт

❤‍🔥5custom 52491570646383678293

31 Jul 2026, 20:59 UTC95 views12 reactions60 Starsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Недо-дизайн для своей вкусняшки

custom 52491570646383678297custom 50914242661386823393💘1custom 53416690495814672141

30 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC87 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52491570646383678297💩3

21 Jul 2026, 19:40 UTC123 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Как-то давно я не рисовал такого формата ничего, надо наверное вспоминать

❤‍🔥3

21 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC124 views17 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ой👀

❤‍🔥10custom 53416690495814672144🍓3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @bartart27. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“That same Bart” (@bartart27), 101 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bartart27.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.