Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 89 days, net -59. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,843–1,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 16:11
1,852
-3
1 Nov 2026, 16:21
1,855
-3
29 Oct 2026, 09:06
1,858
-6
26 Oct 2026, 10:09
1,864
-1
23 Oct 2026, 03:36
1,865
-5
19 Oct 2026, 20:46
1,870
-5
16 Oct 2026, 11:58
1,875
-4
13 Oct 2026, 08:30
1,879
-4
6 Oct 2026, 21:42
1,883
+5
29 Sept 2026, 14:41
1,878
-3
19 Sept 2026, 16:21
1,881
-3
15 Sept 2026, 06:19
1,884
-3
11 Sept 2026, 15:02
1,887
-6
6 Sept 2026, 22:01
1,893
+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:53
1,892
-4
27 Aug 2026, 15:23
1,896
-2
24 Aug 2026, 14:09
1,898
+1
20 Aug 2026, 20:45
1,897
-9
13 Aug 2026, 18:28
1,906
-7
10 Aug 2026, 19:41
1,913
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
228 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5323413617507313622
45
19.7%
custom 5278448801726614961
44
19.3%
custom 5474328151129611674
39
17.1%
custom 5249484362621141855
30
13.2%
custom 5226455465239531261
28
12.3%
custom 5364149763107201021
24
10.5%
custom 5267420382272437099
10
4.39%
custom 5213274352342027512
8
3.51%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сижу себе завтракаю на веранде в красивом месте. Полный чил. Солнышко. Кофе в красивой чашке. Прекрасно приготовленная еда. Кайф вообще.
Внезапно в нос бъёт аромат кошачьей мочи в миксе с разведённым очистителем для унитаза.
Поворачиваю взгляд. Взрослый солидный мужик сосёт дует курит что-то похожее на тамагочи. Или на блок питания.
Понятно.
Бог зачастую общается с нами через детей.
Его сын истошно кричит на всю …
Девочки, это было не просто, но я отобрала 10 фото.
#трусикибусики
Боди J. RO
Джинсы Autentiments
Сумка Amyshehab
Так и идём мужиками вертеть, просекко пить и покупать блядские трусики 🐆
Почему я не выставляю свежие фотки? Потому что мужчина сделал 569 фото одного лука на телефон. Из них я отобрала топовые и избранные 105.
Ну и что мне с этим делать?..
Если вы ещё тут не были, жирный рекоменд 😸
Это был мой третий заход и, пожалуй, самый лёгкий)
Когда я первый раз сходила в верёвочный парк, я сразу поняла что подсела.
Да, это страшно
Да, это весело
Да, это интересно
Да, это переодически физически тяжело
А после – испытываешь приход.
В этот раз я ходила с подругой, она была первый раз, Юля справилась супер, ей понравилось. Мы дружим 28 лет, и вот нашли новый сп…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @barrkaif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Бар Кайф” (@barrkaif), 1,852 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barrkaif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
