Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Massimo Baroni

@baronim5s

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,198subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001048425095
TypeChannel
Username@baronim5s
Created11 March 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/baronim5s

Growth

1,1981,1991,198.57 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,199 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,198 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,198–1,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:221,198-1
7 Aug 2026, 23:181,199no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:471,199first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2551.0%
1632.7%
👏36.12%
😢36.12%
👎24.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2024 to 28 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Nov 2025, 19:03 UTC220 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SnowdenItalia

https://youtu.be/QR02CoT2XoA?si=V0O5ai7t_5eWvnIH

13 Nov 2025, 23:03 UTC280 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Professor X ha scritto: Perché il DIAVOLO PIANGE? Vedete questo dipinto? Per secoli ha commosso, turbato ed emozionato milioni di persone e c’è un motivo se ancora oggi continua a far parlar di sé! Perché ha una storia incredibile dietro. Guardategli il viso. Dà i brividi, vero? Ecco, Lucifero, dopo essersi ribellato a Dio, viene cacciato dal paradiso. L’angelo è appena precipitato sulla terra, e Cabanel ve lo most

12 Nov 2025, 21:44 UTC195 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SnowdenItalia

Basta poco per diventare 'non idonei' alla comunità ed essere cancellati dal web - Il Fatto Quotidiano https://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2025/11/09/censura-digitale-youtube-meta-contenuti-scomodi-oggi/8187367/

28 Oct 2025, 05:32 UTC330 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🔴ULTIMA ORA: IL GIUDICE SUSANNA ZANDA ASSOLTA IN CASSAZIONE. La Corte di Cassazione si è espressa con l'assoluzione della giudice Susanna Zanda dalle accuse rivoltegli. La giudice ha subito provvedimenti e sanzioni disciplinari che minano la sua carriera e la sua dignità umana e professionale per aver emesso sentenze contro le restrizioni ingiustificate alle libertà dei cittadini durante il periodo della c. d. pand

1

12 Sept 2025, 07:05 UTC462 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 Chat Control: La nuova frontiera del controllo digitale in Europa? 🚨 Con la scusa di combattere la pedopornografia, l'Unione Europea sta introducendo una tecnologia che potrebbe cambiare per sempre il nostro rapporto con la privacy. Si chiama Chat Control, ed è stata definita "l'arma invisibile" che monitorerà ogni messaggio, immagine, audio e post che condividiamo, persino su piattaforme con crittografia end-to-e

5👍1

24 Aug 2025, 07:43 UTC401 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

6👍2👏1

8 Mar 2025, 10:31 UTC659 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Tutte le donne hanno una causa comune. Il separatismo nuoce al nostro movimento. Le tendenze separatiste degli anni settanta ci fecero regredire e spalancarono le porte al riflusso. Non stupisce che la parola “femminismo” fosse temuta. Ne era stata data una definizione troppo restrittiva Io definisco la femminista così: una donna che si conferisce da sé potere e autorità e che desidera lo stesso per le sue sorelle.

👍71

23 Feb 2025, 18:57 UTC616 viewsread 7 August 2026

"Gli uomini e le donne sono due forzieri chiusi 🧳, ciascuno dei quali contiene la chiave 🗝 che apre l'altro" Karen Blixen Sette storie gotiche Sogni d'oro! ✨🔮

9 Dec 2024, 22:17 UTC775 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

C’era una volta una formica che andava canticchiando, caricata con un enorme frutto di bosco, quando uno scarabeo le bloccò il cammino ridendo del suo carico e del suo lavoro. Non era la prima volta che lo faceva. La formica non gli diede peso, lo aggirò e continuò per la sua strada. Qualche giorno dopo, lo scarabeo rimase intrappolato nella resina appiccicosa di un albero e chiese aiuto. Alcuni animali, che eran

👍72

30 Sept 2024, 13:53 UTC699 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

"La Russia non è nostra nemica" e il Copasir. Mattia Crucioli: "Per imporre la guerra non basta la propaganda, occorrono la repressione e le minacce" - L'Intervista - L'Antidiplomatico https://www.lantidiplomatico.it/dettnews-la_russia_non__nostra_nemica_e_il_copasir_mattia_crucioli_per_imporre_la_guerra_non_basta_la_propaganda_occorrono_la_repressione_e_le_minacce/5496_56920/

👍3

27 Sept 2024, 17:54 UTC578 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lindipendenteVideo

💥Un pesante bombardamento israeliano ha colpito Beirut, capitale del Libano, provocando una nuova escalation nel conflitto con Hezbollah. Secondo quanto riferito da media libanesi, quattro edifici sarebbero stati distrutti e vi sarebbero numerose vittime civili. L’esercito israeliano ha rilasciato un comunicato, parlando di un «attacco mirato al quartier generale centrale dell’organizzazione terroristica Hezbollah, n

😢3👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @baronim5s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Massimo Baroni” (@baronim5s), 1,198 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baronim5s.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.