Channel
@barkingnews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,130subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001041746139 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @barkingnews |
| Created | 29 March 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/barkingnews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 2,130 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 2,134 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,135 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 2,135 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 17 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
460 reactions across 7 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 188 | 40.9% | |
| 😍 | 80 | 17.4% | |
| 😁 | 50 | 10.9% | |
| 🕊 | 43 | 9.35% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 7.17% | |
| ✍ | 13 | 2.83% | |
| 🍓 | 12 | 2.61% | |
| 🦄 | 11 | 2.39% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 1.74% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 1.30% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.09% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.652% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.652% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.435% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.217% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.217% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.217% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 460reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 April 2025 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Гренландии собака украла камеру у журналистов из associated press, потом случайно ее включила и, когда девайс таки нашли, то получилась небольшая документалка, местами со смешными селфи)
❤52🕊9😍6🔥2🦄2😁2👍1
Голуби и их снимки
🕊34😍16❤10👍1
Сегодня я узнал о существовании голубиной фотосъемки🐦 Жил был такой немецкий аптекарь Юлиус Нойброннер (1852-1932), который славился тем, что быстрее всех доставлял лекарства до санаториев с помощью голубей (крутая ведь идея — я бы хотел иметь такую опцию в яндекс гоу). И вот как-то один из его голубей потерял ориентацию в тумане и вернулся только через четыре недели и сытый. И тогда у Нойброннера появилась мысль о…
🔥22💔8👍3❤2
Муравьи были в шоке от этого видео
😁48❤18🔥9🦄4⚡3🤯2🤣1
Кроличий сплутинг от подписчика) Крошку зовут Чонин
😍58🍓12❤8
Это милое пузолежание называется сплутингом. Сплутинг чаще всего наблюдается у собак, реже — у кошек. Животное ложится на холодную поверхность, распластываясь так, чтобы максимальная площадь тела контактировала с более прохладным покрытием. Это помогает эффективнее сбрасывать избыточное тепло, особенно в условиях, когда температура воздуха превышает привычный комфортный уровень (ourmidland.com). С физиологической т…
❤80✍13🦄5🤗3🌚1👏1
Всем привет! Мы вовсю ищем сммщика и маркетолога! Подписчики нас знают как облупленных, но если кто-то придет с репоста, то коротко о нас: мы делаем одежду и не только, часто с принтами с социально-ироническим бэкграундом. Одежду шьем и печатаем в Москве по нашим лекалам. Мы любим животных — у нас есть свой микроприют @priut50pets, и мы, как можем, помогаем другим инициативам (вот недавний пост про наши достижения в…
❤18❤🔥6
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @barkingnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 667,529 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Barking News - ребятам о зверятах” (@barkingnews), 2,130 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barkingnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.