Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пятыгин Артём. Клинический и бариатрический нутрициолог

Channel

Пятыгин Артём. Клинический и бариатрический нутрициолог

@bariatric1

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

23,645subscribers

-21,428 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245867752
TypeChannel
Username@bariatric1
DescriptionВсё о здоровом питании, витаминах и добавках: честно и без лженауки. Только научный подход. Поможем быть здоровым!
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/bariatric1

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

128 average views per post against 25,212 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.506%. Across the 21,335 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.84% and 23.6%, with a median of 12.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured119 of 122 published in the window (119 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled15,193
Mature posts only0.537% over 106 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers25,212 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 21,335 channels · p10 2.94% · p25 5.84% · p50 12.1% · p75 23.6% · p90 42.5%
Position in cohort0.853th percentile · 1/24 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.114% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

23,64545,07334,3597 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -21,428. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,431–48,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 00:2023,645-1,372
10 Nov 2026, 01:0625,017-78
8 Nov 2026, 15:0025,095-39
7 Nov 2026, 11:4025,134-47
6 Nov 2026, 13:0525,181-31
5 Nov 2026, 10:4125,212-63
4 Nov 2026, 08:5525,275-61
3 Nov 2026, 08:0125,336-35
2 Nov 2026, 11:3025,371-51
1 Nov 2026, 13:0625,422-64
31 Oct 2026, 13:4025,486-62
30 Oct 2026, 14:2625,548-75
29 Oct 2026, 10:4925,623-54
28 Oct 2026, 10:5125,677-1,715
27 Oct 2026, 11:1727,392-53
26 Oct 2026, 14:3027,445-29
25 Oct 2026, 17:0627,474-64
24 Oct 2026, 20:0827,538-76
23 Oct 2026, 19:2527,614-84
22 Oct 2026, 17:0727,698first reading

Engagement

261 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 179 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.48%
avg views ÷ 23,645 subscribers
Avg views / post
113
160 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
162
of 261 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 90 of 160 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held261 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total18,152
Reactions total324
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,830
Videos
≈404
Links
≈153

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 57s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

685 reactions across 168 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24435.6%
👍23934.9%
🔥17926.1%
👌121.75%
🙏30.438%
❤‍🔥20.292%
👏20.292%
🤗20.292%
💊10.146%
💯10.146%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 261 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 685 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 162 posts held from the last 30 days (0.617%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 12:45 UTC52 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Акция INJECTIV — витамин D по 995 ₽ Снизили цену на две позиции с 1 200 ₽ до 995 ₽. Экономия — 205 ₽ на каждой позиции. 🔹 Uvédose D₃ для детей, 100 000 МЕ Раствор для приёма внутрь. 995 ₽ вместо /1 200 ₽/. 🔹 Витамин D, 600 000 МЕ Раствор для инъекций. 995 ₽ вместо /1 200 ₽/. 📦 Доставка оплачивается отдельно по тарифам Ozon. Чтобы оформить заказ, напишите в личные сообщения, какой препарат вам нужен и в какой гор…

14 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC55 viewsread 14 November 2026

Сопровождение когда назначение трудно встроить в день Утром не получается поесть, некоторые блюда не переносятся, а советы из разных источников противоречат друг другу. Полезно разбирать такую ситуацию по фактическому дню, а не по образцу идеального режима. В персональном нутрициологическом сопровождении отправной точкой становится ваша задача: питание, переносимость, организация выполнения согласованного плана. Дл…

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

14 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC40 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Сопровождение когда назначение трудно встроить в день

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

14 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC95 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

💎 INJECTIV — СПЕЦИАЛЬНАЯ АКЦИЯ ДЛЯ ПОСТОЯННЫХ КЛИЕНТОВ! 💉 ГОДОВОЙ КОМПЛЕКТ ВИТАМИННОЙ ПОДДЕРЖКИ ПО СВЕРХНИЗКОЙ ЦЕНЕ! Друзья, сегодня я подготовил особенное предложение для тех, кто уже знаком с INJECTIV и доверяет нам заботу о своём здоровье. 🔥 Годовой комплект INJECTIV — 12 месяцев витаминной поддержки на специальных условиях! 💉 Всего одна инъекция в неделю по индивидуально согласованной схеме. 💎 Что вас ждёт: …

14 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC67 viewsread 14 November 2026

Фолат и B12 похожи не во всём Оба витамина участвуют в кроветворении. При их недостатке возможны похожие изменения общего анализа крови, но исправлять их одним и тем же способом нельзя. После операции вопрос о фолате полезно рассматривать вместе с B12, питанием и схемой добавок. Особенно важна такая ситуация: фолиевая кислота может улучшить картину крови при дефиците B12, не устранив его неврологических последствий…

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

14 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC61 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Фолат и B12 похожи не во всём

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

13 Nov 2026, 16:32 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Video

B12 после бариатрии. Что подскажет анализ? Тёма и Варя обсуждают, какие жалобы стоит рассказать врачу и как он оценивает результат анализа на B12.

🔥2

13 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC82 viewsread 14 November 2026

INJECTIV сначала задача затем выбор программы Если вы рассматриваете инъекционный формат витаминов, начните с вопроса: для чего он нужен именно вам? Профилактика, коррекция подтверждённого дефицита и помощь при новых симптомах требуют разного подхода. У INJECTIV предусмотрены варианты курса на 3, 6 и 12 месяцев. Выбор срока сам по себе не определяет подходящую схему. Состав, условия, ограничения и возможность приме…

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

13 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC68 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

INJECTIV сначала задача затем выбор программы

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

13 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC86 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026

B12 может не хватать и при нормальном гемоглобине После бариатрии важно рассказывать о покалывании, онемении, неустойчивости и изменении походки независимо от того, что написано в общем анализе крови. Дефицит B12 может проявляться неврологическими симптомами без анемии и увеличения эритроцитов. Такие жалобы не доказывают именно этот дефицит: у них есть и другие причины. Но ждать снижения гемоглобина, чтобы обратить…

👍1

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

13 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC77 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

B12 может не хватать и при нормальном гемоглобине

Signed Expert Clinic Media Bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 261 posts we hold for @bariatric1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @bariatric1 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
25 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

Какой показатель в анализах вызывает у вас больше всего вопросов? 🧪 Показатель, который победит, разберём отдельно и подробно — без магии референсов и гадания по звёздочкам в лабораторном бланке. 😄 #ПятыгинРазбирает #АнализыПослеБариатрии #КЛД

  1. Железо/ферритин60%
  2. В12/фолат25%
  3. Общий белок / альбумин30%
  4. Свой вариант в комментариях15%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 261 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пятыгин Артём. Клинический и бариатрический нутрициолог” (@bariatric1), 23,645 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bariatric1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.