Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ﹫ 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋

Channel

﹫ 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋

@barbatosproperty

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003382281325
TypeChannel
Username@barbatosproperty
Created21 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/barbatosproperty

Growth

413 Aug 2026, 00:21 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 07:17 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 00:2113 Aug 2026, 07:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:174no change
13 Aug 2026, 00:214first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 21 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 2 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52827935047439173591416.7%
custom 52829527836060906541315.5%
custom 52831346926509468581315.5%
custom 52829642769385725411011.9%
custom 528277135559757346789.52%
custom 528303019609663604278.33%
custom 528328234503664692678.33%
custom 528297463639969475455.95%
custom 528295185159818715144.76%
custom 528303144163714895833.57%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 21 November 2025 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2025, 12:20 UTC≈1,500 views47 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌟🪽𝗂𝖿 𝗂 𝖼𝗈𝗎𝗅𝖽 𝗌𝖾𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎🥹𝗈𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗆𝗈𝗋𝖾 𝗍𝗈 𝗌𝖾𝖾 𝗒𝗈𝗎. "🔡🎀

custom 528279350474391735912custom 528313469265094685811custom 52829642769385725418custom 52830301960966360424custom 52829746363996947543custom 52829518515981871512custom 52829527836060906542custom 52830314416371489582

21 Nov 2025, 11:46 UTC≈1,480 views37 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🌫 🎀 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋﹙ 𝖺𝗇𝗒 ﹚🪽🪽 🎀𝖼𝗅𝗈𝗌𝖾𝖽゙゙゙ 𝖽𝗆🎀😻𝗌𝖿𝗉🪽

custom 528295278360609065411custom 52827713555975734677custom 52832823450366469265custom 52830301960966360423custom 52827935047439173592custom 52829518515981871512custom 52829642769385725412custom 52829746363996947542

Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @barbatosproperty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 765,002 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“﹫ 𝗇𝖾𝗏𝖾𝗋” (@barbatosproperty), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/barbatosproperty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.