Channel
@bar_in_bar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
258subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002620859364 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bar_in_bar |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bar_in_bar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 258 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 255 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 255 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,662 |
| Reactions total | 40 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
58 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 81.0% | |
| 🍾 | 9 | 15.5% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.72% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так, кажется, я наконец созрел поздравить себя с днем рождения. 4 августа мне исполнилось 27. И каждый год я пытался придумать себе новые цели. Больше заработать. Больше сделать. Больше успеть. А в этот раз поймал себя на мысли, что, наверное, хочу посвятить год себе. Разобраться со здоровьем. И физическим, и ментальным. Разобраться с личной жизнью. С приоритетами. С тем, что действительно важно, а что я п…
🍾6❤1
Впервые за всю свою карьеру я столкнулся с просьбой, которую всегда считал шуткой. — Можно пиво подогреть? Я, если честно, даже завис. Потому что никогда всерьёз не думал, что услышу такую просьбу. И ведь человек не шутил. Теперь сижу и думаю… Вопрос к знатокам: как правильно подогреть пиво, чтобы оно не превратилось в пенную катастрофу? 🍺
Video message, posted without a caption
Наверное, этот пост надо было сделать чуть раньше 😅 Потому что с сегодняшнего дня билеты на Bar Hub подорожали. Но простите, я что-то забыл. Вообще рассказать хочется не об этом. В этом году я выступаю на Bar Hub. Открываю площадку Open Space. 8 сентября в 11:45 жду вас на своей лекции. Те, кто давно подписан на канал, уже примерно знают, о чём я буду говорить. Потому что большая часть лекции здесь появлялась н…
❤6
Но вообще гостевые смены я люблю. Просто со стороны гостя. Когда бар, в который ты давно хотел попасть, приезжает к тебе в город и делает свои коктейли по местным ценам. Ну это ли не сказка? Не надо покупать билеты. Не надо бронировать гостиницу. Не надо искать повод для поездки. Бар сам приехал к тебе. И это касается вообще любого региона. Есть куча мест, в которые хочется попасть. Но не всегда есть возможно…
❤3
Гостевые смены Я когда-то уже высказывался по этому поводу, но повторю. Я не люблю гостевые смены, когда участвую в них сам. Я смирюсь с тем, что не люблю ездить. Смирюсь с тем, что за вечер рассказываешь одну и ту же историю сотню раз. С фотографиями, объятиями, знакомствами и обязательным: — Ну расскажи, как вы там работаете? Но с чем я не могу смириться — это со сбоем ритма. Ты приходишь на чужую стойку. Не з…
❤4
Video message, posted without a caption
Сережа Шигин поясняет за пиво
❤1
Шутка смешная, ситуация страшная
😁1
В ресторане: - Скaжитe, у вaс eщё рaбoтaeт тoт oфициaнт, кoтoрoму я сдeлaл зaкaз?
Конечно, есть еще один тест. Называется «Если бы…» Правила простые. Ты задаешь вопрос, который начинается с этих слов. Например: — Если бы тебя заставили сниматься в порно, но разрешили выбрать категорию — какую бы ты выбрал? Или: — Если бы ты был феечкой Винкс, то какой? Или вообще любую дичь. «Если бы ты мог оставить только одно блюдо до конца жизни?» «Если бы завтра проснулся персонажем фильма, каким бы …
❤3
Конечно, все это шуточные тесты. Но есть еще один. Называется «Пьем». Правила максимально простые. Подходишь к любому человеку и спрашиваешь: — Пьем? Не важно, кто перед тобой. Гость. Официант. Бармен. Управляющий. Собственник. Правило одно. Если человек сказал: «Пьем!» — значит пьешь. И нальется вообще что угодно. Вода. Водка. Фернет-Бранка. Тот самый свободник, который менеджер принес «попробовать». Сок. …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bar_in_bar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 203,949 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BAR in the BAR” (@bar_in_bar), 258 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bar_in_bar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.