Channel
@baoyanghao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
299subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002417414460 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoyanghao |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoyanghao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 299 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 302 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 306 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 302 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 302 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:19 | 301 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
刘记包养 唯一ID： @Liuji （刘记） 势必成为包养行业一线品牌，为会员打造真正管家式VIP服务，优质客户首选品牌，一次合作，终身选择🤝🤝 —————————————————————— ♦️刘记为什么要执行会员制： 过滤口嗨是目的！通过会员制筛选出真正有意愿的优质客户，打造一个积极、互助、有结果、目标一致、有导向意愿的高质量的会员群组。 目前会员人数已超过600+，如果您也喜欢同频类聚与有共同导向意愿的客户一起交流，那么请加入我们！交流才有真火花💥 —————————————————————— ✅选妹子 无需四处观看 我们就是答案✅ 刘记选妃频道： https://t.me/baoyangxuanmeizi ⚠️必须关注频道⚠️ 👇👇点击"开始"按钮👇👇开始您的包养之旅！
咨询入门：888 高端服务，屌丝勿扰。 自注客服： @liujikefuBOT
城市：浙江杭州 年龄：05 身高：165 体重：85 罩杯：B 是否chu：否 能否口：可 能否SM：S 能否无套（体检后）：体检后可 能否过夜：可 能否同居：可 能否飞外地：可 来姨妈时间：8号 长期天数/零花钱：30000-50000 短期天数/零花钱：7-10天 零花钱可分几次：2-3 最早可以出发时间：28号 自我介绍加分项：声甜，肤白 介绍费：8888
咨询入门：888 高端服务，屌丝勿扰。 @baoyangdafa
👍1
省份：湖南 城市：长沙 年龄：21 身高: 165 体重: 88 罩杯: c 职业：无业 是否chu: 否 能否口：可 能否SM:否 能否无套（体检/试纸后）:否 能否过夜：可 能否同居：可 有没有纹身：一点 可否飞外省：可 雷点（不接受）:抠，小气，变态 大姨妈日期：月初 每月陪伴天数：可谈 期望零花钱：看金主 三天零花钱多少：1.5 分几次支付零花钱：2 原因：缺钱 最早出发时间：提前说 自我加分项(认真填写自己的优点)：全脸无整，素颜清纯，马甲线，情商高提供情绪价值，各种风格都可驾驭，口活很好，不过分的可以陪着尝试 介绍费：7888
咨询入门：888 高端服务，屌丝勿扰。 @baoyangdafa
bubu 省份：河南 城市：郑州 年龄：22 身高：168 体重：99 罩杯：B 职业：主播 能否口：可 测试后能否无套：否 能否内射：否 能否飞外省：可 期望零花钱：35000 每月陪伴天数：7 是否chu：否 能否sm：轻微 有没有纹身：否 大姨妈日期：不准 能否过夜：可 能否同居：否 分几次支付零花钱：2-3 自我加分项：小网红 顶美 懂事 情商高 介绍费：8888
❤2🔥1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @baoyanghao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 289,329 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“包养好，得包！” (@baoyanghao), 299 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoyanghao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.