Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 曝光社区~新闻 爆料 娱乐 生活资讯

Channel

曝光社区~新闻 爆料 娱乐 生活资讯

@baoguangsq

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

87,212subscribers

+35,437 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002311012996
TypeChannel
Username@baoguangsq
Description#柬埔寨 #金三角特区 #缅甸 #泰国 #迪拜 #菲律宾 #东南亚 #交流群 全网曝光-聚焦时事 频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态资讯,让你看尽海外华人大小事。 本频道工作人员不会主动私聊任何飞机用户! 🈲 止私自发广告 🈲 止发送招聘信息 🌴新闻投稿: @ailin980412 🌴广告招商: @ailin980412 🌴福利姬🔞: @fulishequ6
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/baoguangsq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@chiguasheq/960383 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC@baoguangsq/40850 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC1.004 days
@chiguasheq/960937 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC@baoguangsq/40848 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC1.0012 hours
@baoguangsq/40936 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC@chiguasheq/9616111 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC1.003 days
@chiguasheq/9654815 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC@baoguangsq/41601 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 18:07 UTC1.002 minutes
@chiguasheq/984812 Sept 2026, 12:36 UTC@baoguangsq/43120 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC1.003 minutes
@baoguangsq/44594 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC@chiguasheq/9934524 Sept 2026, 20:52 UTC1.002 days
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@chiguasheq10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 hours@chiguasheq (7–3)
@knmkio10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0012 hoursthis entry (7–3)
@YTESPD8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0013 hoursthis entry (5–3)
@daDchigua8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.006 minuteseven
@MyanMar9804128 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0011 minutes@MyanMar980412 (5–3)
@pp8546 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.87under a minute@pp854 (6–0)
@SJB000015 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0018 hoursthis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 29 of the 29 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,043 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

51,167108,76579,96687,2127 August 202611 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net +35,437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,527–117,405 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 10:0587,212-1,985
9 Nov 2026, 16:0589,197-1,921
8 Nov 2026, 10:4891,118-1,992
7 Nov 2026, 04:2893,110-2,809
6 Nov 2026, 00:5595,919-1,253
5 Nov 2026, 00:0697,172-444
4 Nov 2026, 03:2997,616-1,292
3 Nov 2026, 03:4798,908-475
2 Nov 2026, 05:5799,383-846
1 Nov 2026, 04:09100,229-757
31 Oct 2026, 07:18100,986-1,131
30 Oct 2026, 07:28102,117-1,194
29 Oct 2026, 06:49103,311-2,462
28 Oct 2026, 04:58105,773+3,263
27 Oct 2026, 01:57102,510+10,021
26 Oct 2026, 00:2692,489-277
25 Oct 2026, 02:3592,766-427
24 Oct 2026, 05:1193,193-1,503
23 Oct 2026, 08:0194,696-4,583
22 Oct 2026, 06:0799,279first reading

Engagement

2,262 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 204 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.516%
avg views ÷ 87,212 subscribers
Avg views / post
450
737 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
737
of 2,262 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held2,262 (7 August 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total331,845
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈34,600
Videos
≈6,850
Links
≈11,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6h 27m
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 384 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 October 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 737 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC2 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:越南这边又开始严查了。说实话,今年下半年,感觉不是在严查,就是在准备严查的路上。 今天一天碰到的事,比我平时一个月遇到的都多。一大早,股东就给我打电话,说半年前有个人P图签证入住我们酒店,现在因为入住手续的问题,要交一大笔罚款。他处理这事的时候,又接到朋友电话,朋友早上出门,护照被收走了,通知下午过去配合调查。 到傍晚,又一个朋友打来电话,他刚出门,家里人就跟他说,执法人员上门了,问该怎么办。我跟他说,只要没做违法的事,不用慌,配合检查完就好了。 我在越南待挺久了,很多国内过来的朋友,都是在这边上班、做生意、长期定居的。突然遇上这种检查,心里难免发慌,这都是人之常情。 换个角度说,越南加强管控,也是为了维持社会秩序、保障城市安全。这边也给在越南的兄弟们提几个醒: 第一,在这边工作的,提前确认好自己的工作许可,手续一定要齐全,别抱有侥幸心理; 第二,长期居住的,签证、暂住登记这些材料,保证全部合法合规; …

13 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTC102 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:今晚金边出动数百名联合执法人员,包括宪兵、特种干预部队及刑事警察等,在法语峰会会议期间加强治安巡逻和安保工作。 没带护照的兄弟们,就别出来瞎几把乱逛了。 🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 ⚡️商务合作投稿爆料:@nuomi980405 🌸搞笑吃瓜🅥 🌸 风景美食🅥 🌸鉴黄中心🅥

13 Nov 2026, 13:10 UTC3 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇲缅甸木姐郊外南翁村一处名为雅泰农场诈骗窝点有20人从该区域逃脱,目前由三兄弟联盟控制的武装力量窝点。 11月8日,20多名在诈骗窝点工作的人员从“雅泰农场”逃出,进入了南翁村及其周边地区。其中还包括一名据信是俄罗斯籍的男子。 该居民表示:8号那天,20多人——推测是参与网络诈骗活动的——从‘雅泰农场逃进了村里。其中有一名俄罗斯人。 当同盟军进行追捕时,部分人被重新抓获并被同盟军士兵带走”据当地人反映,虽然部分逃出者被同盟军武装(MNDAA)成员抓回,但具体被带走的人数尚不清楚。 据当地居民介绍,这些从事“网络诈骗”活动的人员所逃离的雅泰农场,位于南翁村外。在“1027行动”之前,该地点由“龙堂(龙潭)民团占据。 另一位当地居民解释说,在“1027行动”期间,随着德昂民族解放军(TNLA)攻占了相关城镇,龙堂(龙潭)民团撤离了该处。 此后,该地点先是被TNLA武装力量占据,随后又被果敢民族民主同盟军(MNDAA)接…

13 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC2 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

香港警方展开「火石行动」,元朗拘捕21名内地女子,年龄最大73岁 11月12日消息,香港警方近日联合入境事务处展开代号「火石行动」(FLINTSTONE)的执法行动,重点打击非法卖淫活动。11月11日,元朗警区在辖区内展开突击执法,共拘捕21名内地女子,年龄介乎18岁至73岁。 据警方公布,行动由元朗警区特别职务队联合入境事务处人员进行,执法人员针对涉嫌非法卖淫活动的场所及相关人员展开调查和搜查。 行动期间,共有21名内地女子被捕,涉嫌违反逗留条件。其中,一名73岁女子因涉嫌在街头招揽顾客被捕,成为元朗警区相关扫荡行动中被捕的最高龄女性之一。 所有被捕人员目前已被扣留调查,案件仍在进一步处理中。 警方表示,将继续与入境事务处保持合作,通过联合执法行动打击非法卖淫及相关违法活动,并加强对辖区内有关场所的巡查。 此次「火石行动」再次反映香港警方对非法卖淫及违反入境逗留条件行为的持续打击力度。 PS:73岁还在奋斗,你们…

13 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC1 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

庆阳打掉裸聊敲诈团伙抓获17人 警方提醒勿因羞耻沉默! 甘肃庆阳警方近日打掉一个裸聊敲诈团伙,17名犯罪嫌疑人被抓。该骗局以广告引流、录播视频诱导裸聊、木马窃取通讯录和隐私影像为链条,最后以"发给亲朋好友"相威胁索要钱财。 许多人第一反应是花钱消灾,但转账只会让对方视你为"还能继续榨"的对象,越给越多。屏幕那头的"艳遇"往往只是流水线剧本,真正值钱的筹码是手机里的通讯录和面子。 🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 ⚡️商务合作投稿爆料:@nuomi980405 🌸搞笑吃瓜🅥 🌸 风景美食🅥 🌸鉴黄中心🅥

13 Nov 2026, 12:29 UTC382 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

报告:在东盟垫底!柬埔寨成走私与电诈犯罪交织枢纽 欧盟—东盟商业理事会委托跨国打击非法贸易联盟(TRACIT)发布的最新报告显示,柬埔寨在抵御非法贸易能力方面以36.6分(满分100分)在东盟十国中垫底,全球158个国家中位列第138名,远低于东盟49.7分的平均水平。 报告指出,受执法薄弱、非正规经济占比超80%以及腐败等因素影响,柬埔寨已成为假冒商品、非法烟酒、合成毒品(冰毒与氯胺酮)及野生动物走私的重要中转与分销枢纽,其中约48%的酒类消费属未登记的非法市场。同时,该国在供应链中介监管项仅获9.3分,电商平台、经济特区及物流快递监管存在严重漏洞,非法贸易更与人口贩卖及网络诈骗园区深度交织。TRACIT呼吁柬方设立部长级协调员、加强高风险集装箱排查并深化跨境联合执法。 🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 ⚡️商务合作投稿爆料:@nuomi980405 🌸搞笑吃瓜🅥 🌸 风景美食🅥 🌸鉴黄中心🅥

13 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC409 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

🇲🇾马来西亚雪兰莪警方捣毁两个网络诈骗集团,11人被捕,涉爱情及投资诈骗 11月13日报道,马来西亚雪兰莪州警方近日展开两次突击行动,成功捣毁两个涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的犯罪集团,共逮捕11名嫌疑人。 据警方通报,两次行动分别于11月3日及11月10日进行,地点涉及雪兰莪州加影(Sungai Long)及巴生(Taman Aman Perdana)。落网的11名嫌疑人包括1名马来西亚籍男子、7名外籍男子及3名外籍女子,年龄介于22岁至45岁之间。 初步调查显示,这两个犯罪集团涉嫌从事爱情诈骗及虚假投资诈骗活动,主要将海外人士作为目标,通过网络联络受害者实施诈骗。 警方在行动中查获14部手机、6台笔记本电脑、3本笔记本、2台路由器、一体式电脑及iPad等设备,所有查获物品估值约2万令吉。 案件后续方面,部分嫌疑人已被提控,其中两名外籍嫌疑人于11月6日依据《刑事法典》第120B(2)条被起诉,并分别被判罚款2000令吉,罚…

13 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC394 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

马来西亚瓜拉登嘉楼,大白天金店上演惊险抢劫! 昨日上午10点多,两名头戴全盔的男子直接冲进店里,一人持长刀恐吓店员,逼迫店员打开首饰存放柜。整个作案过程不到一分钟,迅速抢走三盘金手镯,预估损失高达30万马币。店内当时还有四名工作人员,万幸没有人受伤,嫌疑人得手之后迅速驾车逃窜。 监控全程拍下了惊险画面,很多人看完都会疑惑:金店一般都配有监控、玻璃柜台,看着防盗设施齐全,为什么光天化日之下还能被快速突破? 很多安保布置更多是事后留证,面对持刀胁迫、快速突袭的劫匪,很难第一时间拦住。黄金价值高、方便携带变现,一直都是劫匪盯上的目标,白天人流多,反而容易让歹徒抱着“速抢速跑”的心态铤而走险。 🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 ⚡️商务合作投稿爆料:@nuomi980405 🌸搞笑吃瓜🅥 🌸 风景美食🅥 🌸鉴黄中心🅥

13 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC4 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#网友曝光 我之前被代理阿欲带去了七星海,进了所谓的“江总团队”。当时阿欲在电话里说得特别好听,包吃包住,代理费可以预支,做满三个月还有提成。结果刚进去第一天,护照就被公司收走了,说是统一拿去办签证。直到现在,护照没还给我,工资也一分钱没拿到。 刚去的第一个月,公司根本不让我们正常上班,天天逼着我们拉人,要求把身边的朋友、同学都叫过来,说拉到人才算业绩。我当时也是傻,连自己的发小阿峰都叫来了。 等人招得差不多了,公司才开始安排我们上班。每天一干就是十五六个小时,提成方案还改来改去,越改越少。业绩不达标就罚站、扣钱,松哥甚至还会动手打人,公司也没人管。 阿欲后来也没落到什么好下场。他前前后后垫了三万多代理费,去找江总要钱,江总还笑着跟他说:“都是自家兄弟,下个月一起结。”结果到了下个月,阿欲就被调去了别的组,之后再也没见过他。后来我才听说,当时那批十几个人,竟然被江总整批卖去了其他园区。 今年风声越来越紧,缅甸那边的园区被…

13 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC537 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:现在黑客是真的嚣张啊,赶紧都早点去死吧!今天晚上我们电脑就被黑客入侵了,飞机给我发消息,我直接拉黑了。 然后他就用我飞机各种给好友发消息,说要搞死我。没想到这个坏种直接给我客户发消息截图,把客户点死了。 你在公司活不下去,快被电死了,看在我这里搞不到钱,就搞点事。活不起就早点去死,出来祸害人!你这种逼人就是自己活不起了,也见不得别人好。要知道你是谁,一刀给你捅了。在东南亚,死个人就像死条狗一样,你就是那条狗! 也告知一下大家,用翻译器都要小心。现在大环境这样子,遇到这种黑客,只能认倒霉了。这人太缺德玩意了,一直在操控我这边电脑,从凌晨到上午没停过,把我客户点得死死的。 🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕🆕 ⚡️商务合作投稿爆料:@nuomi980405 🌸搞笑吃瓜🅥 🌸 风景美食🅥 🌸鉴黄中心🅥

13 Nov 2026, 11:21 UTC467 viewsread 13 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿:希望东风园区江总看到后,能够为我们这些底层的兄弟们主持公道。 博创公司拖欠员工业绩提成,始终不发。其他公司在监狱里给员工发放生活费,出来后给予补偿。唯独我们博创公司,在监狱里没人管就算了,回来后没有补偿,这些我们也能忍。 可是,兄弟们做出的业绩,答应给的工资和业绩提成也不给。毕竟,兄弟们都是拿命挣点窝囊废。这点业绩,公司当初承诺的,为什么现在不给?就这样,消息也不读、不回,怎样对得起兄弟们? 任何一个集团也好,公司也好,都离不开我们这些底层的“狗推”助力。 过河拆桥,太不地道了。当初承诺的算什么?兄弟们逃命几个月,担惊受怕,又坐了一年牢狱,九死一生,终于回到国内。还要面临“帽子叔叔”的压力,哪些不需要用钱?希望领导们看见后,能够换位思考。我们只是想要回属于自己的那一份而已。 江总旗下东风园区东创集团——博创公司 老板:黄毛、大洋(兼财务) 总监:麻子 组长:阿山、大宝 督导:宝森 从2025年10月下旬公…

13 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC2 viewsread 13 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料:中国资金盘APP:“大国崛起”,三方聊天APP:协同互联,主管:香蕉(又名候天来)总监:阿杰(又名杰少) 原公司地址:柬埔寨西港海悦大酒店801办公室。后因被曝光,不得已搬迁至格鲁吉亚巴统市。 答应员工保证办理工作签证!员工跟随公司入境格鲁吉亚后,却告知员工护照要逾期黑着。 辛辛苦苦跟随公司半年,最后不得已被迫离职,还被拉赔付1300美金。前期曝光了一些聊天记录,后续公司补发我7000美金工资,提成我都没要!我做到仁至义尽! 原本以为出来东南亚都是为了求财,大家都不容易,好聚好散!我原本不想撕破脸皮,拽上无辜的同事!只是香蕉,我没想到你做人做事太不讲究! 事情处理结束后,拿曝料我的信息资料到处抹黑我,整个办公室的人都有我个人资料!说我敲诈公司7万美金!满嘴跑火车,侮辱我,说我是代理,是公司骨干,说我倒卖人口去黑园区!给我家里人寄茶叶,找人实名举报我,用这些下三滥的手段来威胁我! 不做亏心事,不怕鬼敲门! …

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,262 posts we hold for @baoguangsq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @baoguangsq as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
11 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
13 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“曝光社区~新闻 爆料 娱乐 生活资讯” (@baoguangsq), 87,212 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangsq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.