9 Dec 2025, 08:07 UTC607 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
⚠️ 注意此类骗局 骗子机器人 @jindakefubot 这类骗局在Telegram上流传已久，仍有不少刚入坑的小白屡屡上当！YY担保郑重提醒：凡是口令洗资、押500返1000（或类似高倍押返）的业务，全是骗局！无论对方声称有哪个“担保”在押，一律别信——没有任何真的，全是收割韭菜的陷阱！ 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
❤2
Channel
YY曝光墙 @baoguangdu全网曝光 反诈中心
@baoguangdu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
444subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002526109818 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguangdu |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguangdu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 444 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 444 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 6 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 28s
- Average length
- 28s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 6 December 2025 to 9 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
9 Dec 2025, 03:05 UTC425 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
骗子高接低卖 不走担保 打预付P图 被识破退群了 大家注意点 骗子ID 👤 8581458506 👦🏻 少侠 👪 （没量自觉走下发） 🌐 @shaoxiazhushou 🕑 已更新 08/12/2025 👤 7398110752 👦🏻 叶子🌿 🌐 @yezi7898 🕑 已更新 03/12/2025 👤 7523682776 👦🏻 小娟 🌐 @xiaojuan222 🇨🇳 Chinese 🕑 已更新 16/11/2025 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
❤1
7 Dec 2025, 13:16 UTC365 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
2025/12/7更新 投稿人自述： 达利自导自演的一出戏，其实公告里面就有他们唱戏的内容我被跑以后才知道，12月7日凌晨我已睡觉，早上小弟给我发信息说有人冒充我，我过去找达利负责人@jiba说，他说是我管理拉的，他自己自导自演的戏他自己上的管理以这个名义给我押金全扣，我管理就是我自己的号@jiba怼的哑口无声，直接演都不演立马给我下管理改招租，找仲裁直接被骂，其他达利担保的回信息一说@jiba跑路管不管都不回信息，过年了大家小心点吧都 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
❤1
6 Dec 2025, 07:35 UTC427 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
2025/12/6更新 据多名用户反映，火狐担保存在恶意拖延退还押金的行为。公群老板自11月23日起多次联系担保负责人要求退还押金，但对方以“负责人有事”、“现实中出事情”等借口故意拖延，至今未履行退款。在此期间，该担保地址（TVBkV6EdmkdrZz7L2o4fWEt6WpTmk6Scmk）仍显示正常活跃状态，可见其并非无法操作，而是故意不退押金。 恶意拖延以各种虚假理由拒绝按时退还押金； 担保方在仍有活跃操作的情况下，拒不履行下押 此行为已实质构成“变相跑路”，损害用户利益。 该担保虽然规模较小，但此类行为已严重破坏信任基础。请所有用户提高警惕，谨慎选择担保渠道，避免继续上当受骗。如有类似遭遇，建议保留证据并及时通过社群渠道公开曝光，防止更多人受害。 备注：请务必通过正规、可信的渠道进行交易或担保，对于缺乏透明度和信用记录的小型担保服务，应保持警惕，避免财产损失。 😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄
❤1💔1
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @baoguangdu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 765,644 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@baoguangdu named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@shaoxiazhushou
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YY曝光墙 @baoguangdu全网曝光 反诈中心” (@baoguangdu), 444 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguangdu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.