北京电诈新套路现金黄金线下交付 8月14日,北京市公安局开了“反诈·向您报告”发布会,说今年北京电诈资金线下转运出现新变化。 以前骗子多靠银行卡转账,现在改成让受害人取出现金,或者买黄金、储值卡这些贵重东西,再通过快递、货运、网约车或者“工具人”线下接走。 今年相关案件已经卷进去570多人,年龄最小18岁、最大89岁,20到50岁和60岁以上的占了83%。 房山有个张先生下了交友软件认识“女网友”,为了见面按要求交了4.7万现金,结果被骗。朝阳吴女士遇到虚假投资,买了近2公斤黄金交给取金的人。石景山许女士在婚恋网站被冒充军人的骗了127万,分5次现金线下交出去。 警方提醒,现在电诈越来越绕开银行转账,现金、黄金这些都可能成了骗子转移资金的工具,大家千万小心。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261

Channel
东南亚大事件
@baoguang180
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19,506subscribers
-1,740 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001354867469 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baoguang180 |
| Description | #东南亚 #全网 #曝光 #泰国 #菲律宾 #柬埔寨 #缅甸 #中国 #老挝 #斯里兰卡 #马来西亚 #新闻资讯 #海外华人 #热点新闻 🌏东南亚有话说频道专注于海外华人最新动态 热点新闻、生活故事、突发事件与华人投稿 本频道拒绝任何政治敏感内容,不刻意引导任何立场,请理性阅读。 ↗️全网最大吃瓜 @cg6669 ↗️东南亚机密档案馆 @jimi667 ↗️东南亚有话说导航 @xinw10 🌟商务合作 @yy261 🌟投稿曝光 @bx658 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baoguang180 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 19,506 | -306 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 19,812 | -125 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 19,937 | -111 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 20,048 | -259 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 20,307 | -291 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 20,598 | -276 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 20,874 | -372 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 21,246 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 21,246 | first reading |
Engagement
170 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.33%
- avg views ÷ 19,506 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 259
- 170 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 170
- of 170 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 44,020 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈62,800
- Videos
- ≈8,100
- Links
- ≈16,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 31m 46s
- Average length
- 35s
Measured directly from 55 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#网友投稿 #启航娱乐 #黑台子 柬埔寨启航娱乐,玩家下分立马找借口说账户风控,说的理由是,同ip多个账户,然后提交资料解冻,说的是48小时解冻,晚上无聊的时候,为了避免他们又找借口,然后就重新注册了一个号,使用的中國手机卡网络,下分半天不到账,去问客服,直接来一句不予接待,然后把我的所有账户全部冻结了。 启航娱乐这吃相,真他妈难看,你们说不账户操作,其他台子只是把多余的账户冻结,只留一个,你们是全部冻结,赢的钱不给,充的钱也不退。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
#印尼资讯:涉案5500万美元,印尼破获柬埔寨网赌网络 印尼警方近日捣毁一个国际网络赌博团伙,查明其运营的“Ujangbet”赌博网站服务器位于柬埔寨。 警方在雅加达和棉兰等地展开行动,抓捕9名嫌疑人,并查扣约100亿印尼盾现金及大量手机、银行卡和其他资产。 警方称,该团伙利用手机话费作为赌博充值手段,玩家将话费转入指定号码后,由柬埔寨的管理员统一管理,再通过印尼当地话费代理商低价出售,将赌博资金转换成现金。 印尼警方与金融交易分析中心调查发现,2025年4月至2026年4月间,相关交易金额超过8900亿印尼盾(约5500万美元)。目前警方仍在追查柬埔寨方面的涉案人员。“ 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
斯里兰卡今年抓外籍涉诈超千人 斯里兰卡警方发言人伍特勒8月13日在记者会上说,今年以来警方搞了24次专项突击,累计抓了1093名外籍涉案嫌疑人。 对比一下:2024年26起案子抓了573名外籍人员,2025年才2起抓26名。今年前8个月抓捕量比2025年全年猛增约42倍,比2024年全年也多了约90%,打击力度明显加大。 现在司法程序已经启动,这些外籍人员都将依法遣返回所属国家。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
#网友爆料 昨天柬埔寨波贝又抓了147人 执法人员发现133名外国人(51名女性),分属三个国籍,包括82名越南籍(26名女性)、18名中国籍(2名女性)和33名泰国籍(16名女性)。此外,还有14名柬埔寨籍(7名女性)。 查获大量涉嫌技术诈骗的物品:207部手机、3台笔记本电脑、31个CPU、97台显示器、313台一体机电脑和8张工作证。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
轻信“缅北高薪赚大钱”陷入电诈团伙,因业绩不达标遭暴力惩罚 一名男子轻信“缅北高薪、轻松赚大钱”的虚假宣传,被诱骗进入电诈团伙。进入窝点后,不仅被迫从事诈骗活动,还因“业绩不达标”遭到团伙成员暴力惩罚,处境十分危险。 警方及相关机构多次提醒,所谓“缅北高薪工作”“轻松赚大钱”往往暗藏诈骗和非法拘禁等风险。切勿轻信陌生人的高薪诱惑,更不要为了所谓的“快速致富”冒险前往高风险地区。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
#网友投稿 亲历东南亚灰产现状,柬埔寨辗转三佛塔,现状惨不忍睹:星链封锁,全网瘫痪,整个园区彻底停摆。 负责人直接摆烂,丢下员工不管,没赚到一分收益,被困异地,无处可去。别看三佛塔暂时安稳,断网已经掐死所有灰色产业,周边大量公司解散跑路。 现在东南亚各国出台严苛反电诈法案,国内跨境打击从未松懈,灰产早已没有任何生存空间。 不管是网赌、电诈、洗钱,各类灰色行当,全是违法犯罪。留在境外,随时面临当地重刑;回国,也要依法追责。哪怕没开单、没获利,长期滞留窝点,一样要判刑。 海外高薪灰产全是陷阱,这条路早已彻底封死,及时回头才是唯一出路。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
⚠️ 世界杯期间全网最大力度福利来袭! ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 💰 新人福利存99U 即可得 100U 🎁 新人专属福利 · 限时开放 ⚡️ 秒存秒到 · 提现极速 🚀 现在加入,马上开玩! 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 🏆 【NB国际线上娱乐城】 🌍 全球华人首选娱乐平台 💎 资金实力雄厚 · 安全稳定 💰 累计出款 1️⃣0️⃣亿📱+ 🎰 海量热门游戏 · 高爆率体验 😃😀😃😀😃😀😃😀😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ♥️♥️🔗 https://nb.fun 😃😀😃👝 📱 点击即送 120% 👝 请认准官方渠道避免假冒平台 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✅ 新人福利已开启 现在加入即可领取豪华礼包!
此人甘肃兰州人,恶意诽谤,四处敲诈勒索 故意假装发错信息转错钱然后再投诉举报敲诈,本人账号已被这个杂种恶意投诉导致司法冻结,以及打电话协商时对方有保留录音,凭录音开始要挟转账等,一系列操作很丝滑 此人是长期敲诈勒索的惯犯 7月份在曼谷以及清迈等地区找工作,混的饭都吃不上的时候还好心给他赚了点钱吃饭抽烟,结果现在回国了反过来咬一口,给甘肃人的脸丢完了,扬言拿着保留的童话录音以及发的语音条要去公安局举报 这种人一辈子吃不上四个菜,各位注意此人账号以免惹火上身,各位网友日后避免不必要的麻烦不要随便跟不熟悉的人打电话以及发语音条避免被小人要挟! 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
#网友投稿:金三角特区内的物业已经陆续开始发出通知。 物业会不定时抽查,发现电诈会直接上报治安局(抽查估计会包括证件问题)。 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
广西特大组织偷渡案今日通报 打掉境内外勾结特大偷渡团伙,摧毁多处出租屋中转窝点,团伙网上发布境外高薪招工,组织人员偷渡出境前往电诈园区,全案400余人落网,12个团伙被打掉。 通报单位:广西崇左边境管理支队 发布时间:2026‑08‑13晚间官方对外发布 案件概况 该案件是境内外蛇头相互勾结的特大组织偷渡专案,团伙核心为余某,专门面向全国招募人员,运送出境前往东南亚电诈园区务工诈骗。 作案流程 1. 线上引流:在社交网络发布虚假境外高薪招聘广告,以高工资、包吃住为诱饵,欺骗全国各地年轻人上钩。 2. 国内中转:把被骗人员集中到华南多地出租屋,设立隐蔽中转窝点统一安置。 3. 边境输送:安排司机、带路蛇头,分批从广西边境便道非法送出境,交给境外蛇头,送入电诈窝点。 行动战果 专案组前后开展52次集中收网行动 • 抓获涉案人员:400余人(包含蛇头、运送司机、偷渡人员) • 打掉犯罪团伙:12个 • 捣毁出…
#公安部上周公布了网络空间监督检查办法 对国内的灰产,可以说是灭顶之灾 首先,无论你是什么角色,公安都有权对你强制检查 你居住地的派出所警察都可以随时进你家门对你的网络和电子设备进行检查 关注东南亚大事件频道➡️ @baoguang180 投稿:@yy261
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @baoguang180. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,359,728 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚大事件” (@baoguang180), 19,506 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoguang180.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.