Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 甜玖的朋友圈(开课中)

Channel

甜玖的朋友圈(开课中)

@baoantianjiu

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,246subscribers

+67 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002398312872
TypeChannel
Username@baoantianjiu
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/baoantianjiu

Growth

1,1791,2461,212.511 September 2026 — 1,179 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,179 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,229 subscribers17 September 2026 — 1,246 subscribers11 September 202617 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,169–1,256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 10:411,246+17
13 Sept 2026, 07:011,229+50
11 Sept 2026, 18:221,179no change
11 Sept 2026, 17:471,179first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 6 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.0%
avg views ÷ 1,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
373
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.169%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held19 (6 September 202611 September 2026)
Views total6,718
Reactions total5
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
480.0%
👍120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Sept 2026, 11:54 UTC134 viewsread 11 September 2026
Photo

🎰 【南山念念&南山甜玖】快乐出击 P半价工兵卷 📮 参与条件: 🌏️ 归属地 广东 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-念念的朋友圈 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳学生交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 30 条 🎫 加入-甜玖的朋友圈(开课中) 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳修车档案 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳活动公告 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳打卡通告群 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 南山念念P半价工兵卷 × 1 💰️ 南山甜玖P半价工兵卷 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 中奖24小时之内联系南汐发放工兵凭证 @chase_nx 3天内完成报告向 @chaseszxc_bot 提交 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 6 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年09月13日 20时00分00秒

10 Sept 2026, 14:33 UTC247 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @SZsnqstl

【少御报告】https://t.me/szSNQSThj 【老师艺名】甜玖 【联系方式】@baoantianjiu123 【所在位置】南山 【验证留名】小王 【验证时间】9.10 【修车费用】600P 【颜值身材】颜值中上,身材苗条,胸B+ 【服务内容】课表 【服务态度】挺热情的,不冷场 【优点缺点】两个优点挺柔软,缺点是有漏洞,需要填补 【推荐程度】推荐 【体验细节】进门见面,介于嫩妹与御姐之间。坐下闲聊,抽烟,交水费。脱衣共浴,妹妹帮洗,挺仔细的,前胸后背搓揉帮洗,洗小弟弟时,更是细心仔细。洗毕上床,老师二话不说直接胸推,对小弟弟直接进攻,被两颗肉球上下前后左右挑逗下,小弟弟膨胀起立,此时,妹妹顺势舔胸,并慢慢滑落至三角地带口交起来,口的时候,妹妹的节奏有点快,让我被刺激得呻吟声不断,但老师口的时候,头发没扎,口的时候头发挡住老师的脸,此时我示意站着口,可以俯视妹妹跪着口小弟弟,也可以看到妹妹的脸。三五分钟口活后,带套开干,

1

10 Sept 2026, 04:10 UTC280 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @chasesz_zypjPhoto

♡ 南汐严选 ♡ ⌚️ 体验时间:2026-09-10 👩🏻‍🎓 服务老师:甜玖 👨🏻‍💻 留名:故事里的小黄花 颜值:8.8 环境:8 身材:8.5 态度:9 服务:9 人照:9 综合:8.72 💌 服务过程 : 作为来深圳第一次cj总体还是满意的,本颜狗晚上翻到老师的榜单果断cj,到了地方我只能说ls神颜人照合一, 身材很好,又白又嫩,🐻也是非常Q弹。ls的口活不错的,全程无齿感,具体后续过程就略过不写了🌝,这几天出差状态不好,总之就是水特别多然后123出货,只能说是喜欢ls这类型的和颜狗放心冲就完了。 🔗 老师资料 :https://t.me/chasesz_lsda/2387

9 Sept 2026, 04:57 UTC202 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @chasesz_xlbPhoto

😀 野寻超级现金福利互推活动强势来袭~😀 最高可获2️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣元 🎯连续30天领取每日红包,累计“尾1”红包: 1️⃣3️⃣个“尾1” →6️⃣个名额 💴8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+8️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 1️⃣4️⃣个“尾1” →3️⃣个名额 💴3️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+1️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 1️⃣5️⃣个“尾1” →1️⃣个名额 💴8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣8️⃣+2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣0️⃣储值卡 ❤️奖励名额先到先得; 🧪按最高档领取,不重复叠加。 4⃣️ 活动时间 活动报名开启时间:北京时间2026年08月27日22:00 活动方案:https://t.me/chasesz_xlb 深圳交流:https://t.me/chasehz_jlq 深圳报名 : 野寻·南汐 @chase_nx 双向联系 @chase_nx_bot

9 Sept 2026, 04:09 UTC304 viewsread 11 September 2026

https://t.me/Crab_bbot?startapp=rev_916 真实报告 · 评分 9 课室环境:房间大,整洁干净 服务态度:好 推荐程度:9 身材颜值:人照8,9成,C级大胸,肤白嫩皮肤 体验细节:幸运中到… —— 修车大队,点开查看完整报告

9 Sept 2026, 04:09 UTC277 viewsread 11 September 2026

https://t.me/Crab_bbot?startapp=rev_913 真实报告 · 评分 8 没想到刚入小螃蟹就中奖了,还是我喜欢的嫩妹,运气不要太好,早早约好时间,按点赴约,开门见人,人照9分,妹妹应该是自聊,付… —— 修车大队,点开查看完整报告

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @baoantianjiu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“甜玖的朋友圈(开课中)” (@baoantianjiu), 1,246 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baoantianjiu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.