Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Банкроверт

@bankrovert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,107subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002204057938
TypeChannel
Username@bankrovert
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bankrovert

Growth

1,1061,1101,1086 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,106 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,107 subscribers1,1076 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,105–1,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:231,107+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:411,106-2
7 Aug 2026, 00:061,108-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:071,110no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:521,110first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.6%
avg views ÷ 1,107 subscribers
Avg views / post
372
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,436
Reactions total221
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7333.0%
6328.5%
🔥198.60%
💯146.33%
😁146.33%
👏104.52%
👀62.71%
😨52.26%
🤯52.26%
🥰31.36%
💩20.905%
😍20.905%
🤔10.452%
🤡10.452%
🤮10.452%
🥱10.452%
🥴10.452%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC160 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Век живи - век учись... Новый процессуальный институт - самоисправляющиеся недостатки искового заявления. Итак, есть иск поданный... Куда? В СОЮ, конечно. Через 5 дней после подачи появляется запись об оставлении иска без движения (это мы знаем, ведь новый Новый Год уже ближе, чем прошедший Новый Год). Определение, разумеется, не отправляют ни истцу, ни его представителю (это тоже понятно, принцип состязательности

😁74🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 10:29 UTC226 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Солидаритет требования по займу и убытков, связанных с выдачей займа Верховный Суд РФ опубликовал судебный акт по делу Мурманского морского пароходства. Следуя позиции, ранее изложенной в Определении ВС РФ от 20.05.2026 по делу Энергостройинвест о допустимости изолированной уступки с учётом обстоятельств заключения договора, суд заключил, что в данном случае имела место изолированная уступка, в том числе с учетом

👍52👏2🤔1🥴1

31 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC371 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Совсем неюридическое Это конечно, мало кому интересно)) Но у меня в реальной партии впервые случился мат Легаля) Ставьте смайлик, если знаете, что это за фигня)

👍1410👀6

31 Jul 2026, 10:48 UTC389 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Судебное_историческое Сегодня в позабытой уже рубрике история про злоключения судей Зюзинского районного суда в середине 90-х, изложенная в решении ВС РФ. Очень занимательный и немного жуткий рассказ о том, как в суде остался единственный судья по уголовным делам, как он рассматривал дела, переходя из зала в зал, и как сотрудники суда массово уволились, потому что их покусали блохи(!). Судье пытались прекратить п

💯5😨5🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 16:12 UTC385 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

На собеседованиях я люблю задавать вопрос про независимые гарантии. Вопрос нужный, видимо. С учетом того, что в статье Ъ про уступку банком права требования к принципалам почему-то сказано, что после уступки цессионарий будет иметь дело с банком-гарантом (а не с принципалом, у которого денег нет). Впрочем, было бы неплохо) https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8847739

😁4👍32👏2

29 Jul 2026, 17:45 UTC356 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На прошлой неделе Верховный Суд в очередной раз отменил решение о признании должника банкротом как отсутствующего. Как верно заметил ВС, отсутствие ведения хозяйственной деятельности у общества - еще не основание для введения упрощенной процедуры, если директор не скрывается, реагирует на требования кредиторов и обеспечивает участие в заседании (Определение ВС РФ от 22.07.26 № 304-ЭС26-6256 по делу № А03-20779/2024)

👍62🥱1

28 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC384 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Вот в этот раз из Москвы можно не лететь, а доехать на велосипеде... Банкротно-клубная доступность растет, стало быть https://t.me/BankruptcyClub/1053

👍72💩2🔥1🤡1🤮1

27 Jul 2026, 15:50 UTC413 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В итоге солидаритет до абсурда не довели. Сегодня ВС РФ удовлетворил жалобу кредитора и сохранил требование об убытках в конкурсной массе, тем самым признав, что покупатель дебиторской задолженности не приобретает одновременно и требование о взыскании убытков, связанных с формированием этой задолженности

👍72👏1

26 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC441 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Казалось бы только что мы провожали первые июльские выходные... Хвать! А уж и последние меркнут в вечерних сумерках. Летит невозвратное время, как сказал Вергилий.. Всем хорошей последней июльской недели)

💯97🥰2

26 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC354 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Скоро будут шмонать на наличие Цивилистики https://share.google/7bEuIwsY4wBuSYSln

3👍1😁1

26 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC275 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawegorov

Внимание всем! Те, кто зарабатывает деньги самогоноварением и распространением и положительно оценивает наши усилия по обустройству самогонной отрасли страны в достойном виде, а также по ее развитию, внедрению из-за рубежа новых ингридиентов, методов и способов приготовления, есть возможность поддержать издание журнала "Ц-самогоноварение" материально. Ибо напоминаем, что само понятие самогона, основанное на свободе п

5👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bankrovert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 159,454 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Банкроверт” (@bankrovert), 1,107 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bankrovert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.