Channel
@banklessofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
23subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002053569074 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @banklessofficial |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/banklessofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 23 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 24 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 24 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
BTC: Rather than focusing on whether the current decline is already wave 3 to the downside or still only wave 1 , the more important factor at this stage is the resistance structure overhead. As long as the resistance levels continue to hold, there is no meaningful signal that a sustainable recovery has begun. The downside pressure remains elevated while the market trades below these key levels, particularly below th…
BTC: From an Elliott Wave perspective, it is entirely possible that Bitcoin could temporarily fall below a well-known Power Law channel in a Wave 2 correction after completing a very large long-term uptrend. That would not necessarily mean Bitcoin has failed in the long run, nor would it automatically invalidate the broader Power Law concept. A subsequent Wave 3 could then bring price back into the channel and contin…
Bitcoin and Gold are moving opposite right now. -0.88. Gold up, Bitcoin down. All year. When people get scared, they still pick gold over bitcoin. That is the message. The market is the boss. Not my opinion.
BTC: Bitcoin appears to have started wave 5.
ETH: Ethereum has now formed one more low, which means wave (c) looks technically complete. However, there is no upside reversal signal yet and the 100% extension target for wave (c) is at $2177, which is below the current price.
BTC: The 21week EMA has acted as support level today.
LINK: Chainlink remains in a moderate local uptrend from the February lows, with the white scenario still favoring higher prices in the short term. The next resistance zone remains between $11.50 and $12, where the market could face stronger selling pressure. Leading Scenario: The recent bounce from support keeps the local bullish structure intact for now. As long as Chainlink remains above $9.28, another upside ext…
BTC: Bitcoin has still not found a clear local support level at the moment and has once again been rejected from the 100% extension region around $82,000. Looking at the daily chart, the next larger structural support comes in around $78,700, where the 21-week exponential moving average is currently located. Below that, the next important support region is around $74,500. Underneath this level, the next major struct…
BTC: A new tool going live in the MCO Terminal tomorrow. The liquidation heatmap shows where leveraged positions would get liquidated. Bright bands cluster at price levels where many positions would be force-closed if the price reached them. These zones act as magnets because forced selling triggers cascades. Current BTC magnets: · Resistance: $83.4k (immediate), $84.2k, $88.3k · Support: $78.5k (immediate), $76.9k (…
Bitcoin is flashing a bullish signal. Your Vector framework shows: * Momentum: At 1 → well above the +0.5 bullish threshold * Risk Index: Fully reset at 0 → low-risk environment This combination is notable: * Strong momentum confirmation * Minimal downside risk pressure Historically, this setup has aligned with major upside phases, while helping avoid drawdowns during bearish periods. Interpretation: * Market …
DOT: The price has extended its wave 2 pullback, but this is still a 3-wave decline and micro support is still holding. This is a 1-2 setup but please note the overall context is not bullish.
Last 2 hours remaining for the confidential membership to end. After this we will be closing the gates forever. Keep in mind that the members inside the circle receive 1 on 1 mentorship in achieving your financial goal in trading and long term investing. 🔥🔥PRICING (Heavy Discount)🔥 Monthly- $199 (Was $699) 3 Months - $299 (Was $999) Yearly - $399 (Was $1999) Lifetime- $599 (Was $2999) 🔥JOINING INSTRUCTIONS🔥 Connec…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @banklessofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bankless 🚨” (@banklessofficial), 23 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/banklessofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.