Channel

𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐇𝐈𝐆∮𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐐

@bandhig_cashaq

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,144subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001877268658
Type	Channel
Username	@bandhig_cashaq
Created	Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	7 August 2026
Last confirmed live	16 September 2026
Measurements held	12
Confirmed unchanged	2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/bandhig_cashaq

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,139–1,182 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
12 Sept 2026, 12:36	1,144	-4
8 Sept 2026, 08:20	1,148	-7
2 Sept 2026, 17:48	1,155	-1
30 Aug 2026, 14:47	1,156	-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:04	1,159	-5
24 Aug 2026, 00:17	1,164	-9
19 Aug 2026, 22:17	1,173	-1
16 Aug 2026, 16:12	1,174	-3
13 Aug 2026, 07:35	1,177	+3
10 Aug 2026, 12:21	1,174	+10
7 Aug 2026, 02:00	1,164	no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:48	1,164	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share	Share, drawn
❤	2	100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 17:50 UTC4 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

𝗠𝗮 𝗶𝘀𝗸𝗮 𝗷𝗼𝗼𝗴𝘁𝗲𝘆 𝗔𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗼 𝘄𝗮𝗾𝘁𝗶 𝗯𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗴𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝘅𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗮𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗹𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗮𝗶𝗱𝗼 𝗨'𝗹𝗲𝗵 𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗮𝗱𝗮, 𝘄𝗮𝘅𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗮𝗻 𝗸𝘂𝘂 𝘀𝗼𝗼 𝘅𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗹, 𝗸𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝘂𝗴𝘂 𝗳𝗮𝗮𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝗼𝗰 𝗸𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗵, 💯 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗳 𝗶𝘆𝗼 𝗸𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗮𝗺𝗼, 𝗡𝗮𝗴𝘂 𝘀𝗼𝗼 𝗯𝗶𝗶𝗿 𝗔𝗾𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗼 𝗸𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝗾𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗲𝘆𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗴𝘂 𝘅𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗻 👇 @jaceylqore @Enjoy_boy1 @Cilmu_nafsi_10 @HoygaShekoyinka @Saxiibka_Nolosha @HOYGAJACAYLKA @Aqoonta_kaa_maqan @Xikmadoiyodhiirigalin Admi

❤1

10 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC7 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Photo

❤1

3 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC1 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

20 Jun 2026, 18:09 UTC2 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

12 Jun 2026, 18:19 UTC6 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

29 May 2026, 17:48 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

23 May 2026, 17:05 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

17 May 2026, 18:03 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

8 May 2026, 16:55 UTC9 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

3 May 2026, 17:33 UTC6 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

25 Apr 2026, 16:57 UTC7 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

18 Apr 2026, 17:08 UTC16 viewsread 7 August 2026

Photo

𝗠𝗮 𝗶𝘀𝗸𝗮 𝗷𝗼𝗼𝗴𝘁𝗲𝘆 𝗔𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗼 𝘄𝗮𝗾𝘁𝗶 𝗯𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗴𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝘅𝗮𝘆 𝗿𝗮𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗹𝗼 𝗳𝗮𝗮𝗶𝗱𝗼 𝗨'𝗹𝗲𝗵 𝗻𝗼𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗮𝗱𝗮, 𝘄𝗮𝘅𝗮𝗻 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗮𝗻 𝗸𝘂𝘂 𝘀𝗼𝗼 𝘅𝘂𝗹𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗹, 𝗸𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝘂𝗴𝘂 𝗳𝗮𝗮𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗱𝗮 𝗯𝗮𝗱𝗮𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗼 𝗻𝗼𝗼𝗰 𝗸𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗮 𝗹𝗲𝗵, 💯 𝗦𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗳 𝗶𝘆𝗼 𝗸𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗮𝗺𝗼, 𝗡𝗮𝗴𝘂 𝘀𝗼𝗼 𝗯𝗶𝗶𝗿 𝗔𝗾𝗿𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲 𝗼𝗼 𝗸𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝗾𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝗹𝘀𝗵𝗼 𝘄𝗲𝘆𝗻𝘁𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗴𝘂 𝘅𝗶𝗿𝗮𝗻 👇 @dhiiriye @Enjoy_boy1 @wadnojacayl @LAMAANe24h @Cilmu_nafsi_10 @HoygaShekoyinka @Saxiibka_Nolosha @udhawoow_allaah @HOYGAJACAYLKA @Aqoont

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bandhig_cashaq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Fahanka nolosha💯💥
@fahanka6 · 3502 posts 𝐓𝐄𝐀𝐌_𝐆𝐎𝐑 𝐆𝐎𝐑 🦅
@TEAM_GOR_GOR · 2771 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Aqoonta Kaa maqan
@Aqoonta_kaa_maqan · 13,12120 posts 𝗘𝗻𝗷𝗼𝘆_𝗯𝗼𝘆 ❤️‍🩹
@Enjoy_boy1 · 5,77420 posts HOYGA JACAYLKA
@HOYGAJACAYLKA · 18,18320 posts HOYGA SHEKOYINKA
@HoygaShekoyinka · 13,02620 posts Zaaxiibka_Nolosha 🖇✨🌿🖤🌏🕊😇
@Saxiibka_Nolosha · 15,32520 posts 𝗛𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗿𝗶_𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗴𝗮 🖤✨🦋📚🔐🌍
@Xikmadoiyodhiirigalin · 19,08220 posts DHIIRIYE CHENNEL
@dhiiriye · 10,2276 posts Jowharadi qalbiga❤☘💡🥀
@Jowharadi_qalbiga143 · 9,2366 posts LAMAANE📮🦋
@LAMAANe24h · 19,1106 posts Udhawoow alle❤️
@udhawoow_allaah · 10,3986 posts Wadno jaceyl
@wadnojacayl · 4,6816 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 2; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 2; vacant every time we have ever looked

@bandhig_cashaq named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@cilmu_nafsi_10
named in 20 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

@jaceylqore
named in 14 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐁𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐇𝐈𝐆∮𝐂𝐀𝐒𝐇𝐀𝐐” (@bandhig_cashaq), 1,144 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bandhig_cashaq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.