🔤има для того и создана в белых тонах, что-бы начинать жизнь с чистого листа))
custom 537083817823832351138custom 546096073973066580521custom 544497012122112199014custom 536852548867327906911

Channel
@bananainba
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
625subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020814249 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bananainba |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bananainba |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 625 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:50 | 630 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 630 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
645 reactions across 7 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5276022798039413896 | 87 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5231157389276764492 | 70 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5452086194835836548 | 54 | 8.37% | |
| custom 5253987236399049465 | 53 | 8.22% | |
| custom 5276349039460251670 | 52 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5370838178238323511 | 52 | 8.06% | |
| custom 5199912979667116975 | 49 | 7.60% | |
| custom 5460960739730665805 | 40 | 6.20% | |
| custom 5377784574875035213 | 30 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5440745063107809647 | 30 | 4.65% | |
| custom 5355175278618377203 | 18 | 2.79% | |
| custom 5224338806571824823 | 17 | 2.64% | |
| custom 5280570915002810830 | 16 | 2.48% | |
| custom 5444970121221121990 | 14 | 2.17% | |
| custom 5368525488673279069 | 11 | 1.71% | |
| custom 5278266712293145751 | 10 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5350330400889653235 | 10 | 1.55% | |
| custom 5289696204383344801 | 6 | 0.93% | |
| custom 5435973972917245954 | 5 | 0.775% | |
| custom 5472276337878134745 | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 7 further kinds | 17 | 2.64% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 645reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 11 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bananainba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 November 2025 to 11 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔤има для того и создана в белых тонах, что-бы начинать жизнь с чистого листа))
custom 537083817823832351138custom 546096073973066580521custom 544497012122112199014custom 536852548867327906911
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 544074506310780964730custom 537083817823832351114custom 535033040088965323510custom 54722763378781347454custom 52760227980394138961custom 52805709150028108301
нуу как вы, родные? как прошёл новый год?)🎄
custom 523115738927676449241custom 535517527861837720313custom 519991297966711697510custom 528057091500281083010custom 54359739729172459545custom 52539872363990494654custom 52760227980394138962
🍂🍂 Вот и наступает новый год! Хочу поблагодарить всех людей, которые как-то взаимодействовали со мной, каждый из вас – чему научил меня. В новом году желаю всем совершенствоваться, поставить цели и достичь их. И.. просто цените всех кто рядом с вами – важное правило, которое я обозначила для себя. Всех крепко обняла 🤍
custom 525398723639904946533custom 519991297966711697521custom 527602279803941389621custom 527826671229314575110custom 53551752786183772035custom 52311573892767644924custom 52805709150028108304
🤎// Есть новогоднее настроение? ₊ ⋆
custom 527602279803941389642custom 523115738927676449225custom 519991297966711697518custom 525398723639904946510
- не подскажите время? - время отпустить прошлое.
custom 527634903946025167052custom 527602279803941389621custom 546096073973066580519custom 52539872363990494656custom 52805709150028108301
в принятии каждого времени года 🫶🏼
custom 545208619483583654854custom 537778457487503521330custom 522433880657182482317custom 52896962043833448016❤🔥3🍓3💋3💘3
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @bananainba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,391,286 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“˖ ࣪ Эстетик ᡣ𐭩” (@bananainba), 625 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bananainba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.