حواستون باشه که تماشای این فرضیه میتونه تمام ادراک سینمایی شما رو تحتالشعاع قرار بده. نگید که نگفتی! آیا واقعا آقای اختاپوس دشمن باب اسفنجی بود یا بهترین دوستش؟ #SpongeBobSquarePants 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤14🤔2🕊1😁1

Channel
@bamabin_com
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
34,920subscribers
-325 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001599930971 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bamabin_com |
| Description | [This Channel is not intended to violate any condition of use. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.] |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bamabin_com |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:27 | 34,920 | -35 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:34 | 34,955 | -40 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 34,995 | -24 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 35,019 | -35 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 35,054 | -40 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 35,094 | -35 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 35,129 | -68 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 35,197 | -39 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 35,236 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 35,244 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 35,245 | first reading |
105 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (3 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 205,737 |
| Reactions total | 2,579 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 47 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,319 reactions across 94 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 968 | 41.7% | |
| 👍 | 350 | 15.1% | |
| 🤣 | 346 | 14.9% | |
| 🔥 | 237 | 10.2% | |
| 👏 | 91 | 3.92% | |
| 💔 | 75 | 3.23% | |
| 😁 | 69 | 2.98% | |
| 🤩 | 28 | 1.21% | |
| 👀 | 25 | 1.08% | |
| 👌 | 23 | 0.992% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 0.69% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 0.69% | |
| 🎉 | 11 | 0.474% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 0.474% | |
| 😢 | 11 | 0.474% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.388% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.388% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 0.345% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 0.172% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.129% | |
| 6 further kinds | 9 | 0.388% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,579reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حواستون باشه که تماشای این فرضیه میتونه تمام ادراک سینمایی شما رو تحتالشعاع قرار بده. نگید که نگفتی! آیا واقعا آقای اختاپوس دشمن باب اسفنجی بود یا بهترین دوستش؟ #SpongeBobSquarePants 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤14🤔2🕊1😁1
به حالت صورت تونی سوپرانو تو این سکانس توجه کنید. به حالت نفرتی که توی صحبتهای اولیهش هست و همون حالت تبدیل به یه شیطنت بچگونه میشه. به نحوهی ادای کلمات دقت کنید. تو حدود ۳۰ ثانیه طیفی از عواطف رو به بهترین شکل ممکن نشون میده. واقعا که گاندولفینی خدابیامرز نابغه بود. #Sopranos 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤18👍6🤣3👏2💯1
یکی از جنجالیترین و قویترین درامهای قرن ۲۱. بعد از دیدن این فیلم خیلی از باورها زیر سوال میره؛ از باور به معصومیت کودکان و آثار قضاوتهای اجتماعی تا مفهوم بخشش و بیگناهی. به هیچ بهونهای دیدن این فیلم رو عقب نندازید. The Hunt 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
👍18❤4🔥3👏1💯1
هیدن پنیتیر تو ۳۶ سالگی فوت کرده. تف به این دنیا. کی فکرش رو میکرد صبح پاشی و خبر مرگ بازیگری رو بخونی که جوونیات تو سریال Heroes روش کراش داشتی. روحش شاد و یادش گرامی 🖤🌹 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
💔47🤯3❤2😢2🥰1😐1
یکی از قشنگترین خبرهای امروز مربوط به ازدواج دختر بروس ویلیس و دمی مور بود. واقعا از این که دیدم هنوزم بروس ویلیس سر پاست و تو مراسم حضور داره، خوشحال شدم. سرت سلامت ستون. #BruceWillis 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤34❤🔥3💔1🤩1😍1
چند تا فیلم رمانتیک مخصوص تماشا با یار جانی که باید دو تایی ببینید و در موردشون صحبت کنید: Obsession Gone Girl The Drama Bones And All Ready Or Not Blue Valentine The Housemaid Get Out Pearl Together Fresh Don't Worry Darling Revenge The Piano Teacher Companion 500 Days Of Summer Marriage Story Buffalo '66 It Ends With Us Indecent Proposal Phantom Thread Last Tango In Paris 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤11🤣5👀3🫡2🤝1
همون فرمون؛ منتها این بار برای هری پاتر! #HarryPotter 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
🤣15❤2👀1👍1🔥1😁1
نقدهای مثبت و تعریف و تمجید از سریال جدید دیسی با عنوان Lanterns اینقدر زیاد بوده که هر کسی دیده، به به و چهچهش بلند شده. اما چرا اینجوریه و دلیل موفقیت کار چیه؟ چون کار به کاردون سپرده شده. پشت این سریال غولی به اسم دیمون لیندلوف خوابیده؛ از خالقان لاست و مغز متفکر سریالهای بینظیری مثل Leftovers و Watchmen کسی که ۱۲ بار نامزد امی شده و تو سریالسازی رقیب نداره. قسمت اول سریال فردا پخش میشه و مطمئنم جای خالی خ…
❤19👍3👌2🤣2👏1🔥1
پدران و دختران یه فیلم ساده نیست، یه تجربهی احساسیه؛ از اونایی که تا مدتها به روابط بین شخصیتهاش فکر میکنی و بعضی صحنههاش تا آخر عمر گوشهی ذهنت میمونه. یه فیلم روانشناختی که میتونه به بینندهش کمک بزرگی توی روابط عاطفی بکنه و باعث بشه یه سری مشکلات پسزمینهای رو بهتر درک کنه. Fathers & Daughters 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤7👍2🔥2👏1
از اون دست فیلمهای نابی که ترس و دلهره رو با نورپردازی سوررئال، فیلمبرداری جذاب و افکتهای صوتی بینظیر به بیننده منتقل میکنه. داستان حملهای فرازمینی که آرامش تازه بازیافتهی شخصیت فیلم رو مخدوش میکنه. متاسفانه یه مدت نباید لینک بذاریم. ولی اسم فیلم یا سریال رو میذارم که راحت کپی کنید و توی اپ یا سایت جستوجو کنید. No One Will Save You 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
❤12👍4👌1👏1🔥1🤩1
🎬 دومین تریلر سینمایی By Any Means (با زیرنویس اختصاصی) تقریبا یک ماه دیگه به اکرانش مونده فقط 🔥 #MovieTrailer #ByAnyMeans 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
🔥10❤3👍2👀1👏1🤩1😁1
متاسفانه عدهای چشم تنگ حیف نون پستهای خبری صبحمون رو هم ریپورت کردن و پشتیبان تلگرام بهمون هشدار داده. محض احتیاط حتما توی کانال پشتیبان عضو بشید و ربات تلگراممون رو هم داشته باشید که اگه خدایی نکرده اتفاقی برای این کانال افتاد، همدیگه رو گم نکنیم. 🫶کانال پشتیبان بامابین 🤖@Bamabin_bot ذکر بعد از عضویت تو کانال پشتیبانی دعا برای سلامتی مادر و خواهر راپورتچی باشه. 🥐 @Bamabin_Com | 🔐 @Bamabin_Support
👍45❤9🤣3👏2🫡2❤🔥1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @bamabin_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,030,993 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال بامابین | Bamabin | با ما بین” (@bamabin_com), 34,920 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bamabin_com.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.