4 measurements spanning 5 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,432–1,435 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:16
1,435
+3
14 Sept 2026, 08:21
1,432
-1
13 Sept 2026, 07:22
1,433
no change
13 Sept 2026, 06:47
1,433
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 1,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
293
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.879%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held
20 (4 September 2026 – 7 September 2026)
Views total
5,866
Reactions total
38
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
6m 08s
Average length
2m 03s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
12
31.6%
👍
8
21.1%
😢
8
21.1%
👎
3
7.89%
😱
3
7.89%
🤔
3
7.89%
👏
1
2.63%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نظرتان در مورد این منظره را بنویسید.
دهنه؛ جایی که کوه، آب و آبادی یکجا به هم رسیدهاند. 🏔️🌿💧
اینجا مرکز بلخاب است؛ شهری کوچک در دل کوههای بزرگ، با بازاری که نبض زندگی مردم در آن میتپد و رودی که از کنار آبادی میگذرد.
دهنه را باید دید، نه فقط شنید... ❤️
#دهنه #بلخاب #سرپل #افغانستان #مرکز_بلخاب #Belkhab
ابراهیم رحیمی
کانال بلخاب زیبا
@balkhabe_ziba
بازداشت سه چهره شیعه و بیخبری از سرنوشت آنان
خبر تلویزیون آرمان: تلویزیون تمدن به نقل از شاهدان عینی گزارش داده است که صوفی گردیزی، سید حسن شریفی بلخابی و محمدحسین سنگردوست پس از بازداشت و انتقال به وزارت عدلیه طالبان، ناپدید شدهاند.
براساس این گزارش، صبح یکشنبه، ۱۵ سنبله، نشست شماری از بزرگان و متنفذان شیعه در دفتر روابط مردمی بزرگان هزاره و اهل تشیع در منطقه سرکاریز کابل برگزار شده بود.
شاهدان گفتهاند که در…
منابع میگویند طالبان امروز محمد حسن شریفی بلخابی، نماینده پیشین مجلس نمایندگان افغانستان را در کابل بازداشت کردهاند.
شریفی بلخابی پس از سقوط نظام جمهوری افغانستان در کشور ماند و در کمیسیون روابط مردمی هزارهها و شیعیان فعالیت میکرد. بر اساس گزارش منابع، طالبان پس از محاصره این دفتر، او را بازداشت کرده است.
طالبان تاکنون درباره دلیل بازداشت شریفی بلخابی توضیحی نداده است.
#Asif_Akbari
کانال بلخاب زیبا
@balkhabe_ziba
🌿 قریه دِه ملایان؛
گوشهای از درهٔ مزار بلخاب
اینجا دهملایان است؛ قریهای با طبیعت زیبا در درهٔ مزار، جایی که طبیعت، تاریخ و قصههای قدیمی مردم هنوز زنده است.
در همین قریه، زیارتگاه ملا احمد پیران قرار دارد؛ استادی که به روایت مردم، استاد فرزندان حضرت میر سید علی بوده و نامش از گذشتههای دور با این دیار گره خورده است.
قصهٔ پیران، مردم و سرزمینی که نسل به نسل روایت شده... ❤️🌿
📍دهملایان، درهٔ مزار، ولسوالی بلخاب…
چندی قبل عکسی از صورت مجروح استاد حسینی بلخابی در فضای مجازی پخش گردید!!!!!! که باعث تاسف گردید،داستان این حادثه ی تلخ چه بوده است ،مطلعان گزارش دهند!!!!!
کانال بلخاب زیبا
@balkhabe_ziba
😢8🤔3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @balkhabe_ziba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
🔥YoüTüBe 💯 @Youtube_org · 25,094 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 September 2026
کانال رسمی حکیم دکتر حسین روازاده @ravazadeh · 26,048 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بلخاب زیبا” (@balkhabe_ziba), 1,435 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/balkhabe_ziba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.