Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Baise Ma Hache Official

@baisemahache

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,701subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001436487838
TypeChannel
Username@baisemahache
Created9 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/baisemahache

Growth

1,7011,7061,703.56 August 2026 — 1,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,706 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,702 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,701 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,700–1,707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:481,701-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:181,702-4
7 Aug 2026, 19:411,706+1
6 Aug 2026, 22:161,705first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 7 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.7%
avg views ÷ 1,701 subscribers
Avg views / post
659
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held15 (7 April 202628 July 2026)
Views total4,610
Reactions total183
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

388 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥17344.6%
9123.5%
7118.3%
👍4712.1%
👎61.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 388reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 14:28 UTC413 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @paulwaggenerofficial

https://youtu.be/iEof7bbY4ms?is=pf02l5bkHoBYhBwm Share this one if you agree.

🔥16👍1

20 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC861 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

As long as the West remained on horseback, it remained in the vanguard (…) Pessimism—and the will that persists within that pessimism: therein lay the whole of the West. And this morning, at our meeting at dawn, my knight told me that the goal and the reason for his journey matter little, so long as a dark obstinacy hardens his heart. He said to me: ‘Perhaps I am nothing more than a will in motion, and that is what f

135

20 Jul 2026, 15:02 UTC809 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

« Tant que l'Occident fut à cheval, il fut en avancée (…) Le pessimisme et la volonté dans ce pessimisme : là fut tout entier l'Occident. Et, ce matin, à notre rendez-vous de l'aube, mon chevalier me dit que peu importe le but et la raison de son voyage pourvu qu'une sombre obstination lui durcisse le cœur. Il me dit : ‘Je ne suis peut-être qu'une volonté qui marche et c'est ce qui te fascine parce que trop de gloses

14👍21🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC711 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zentropa451

Real life is often disappointing. Friends fail and drift away. Injuries get in the way of physical goals. Factors completely out of your control, from sheer chance to the whims of those in positions of unaccountable power, can cost you money and time. Given all this, it’s easy to just stop caring, give up on dreams, and live vicariously through entertainment or escapism. But “escapism” can also be a spur to action. H

25🔥3

20 Jul 2026, 13:45 UTC583 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zentropa451Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

20 Jul 2026, 12:42 UTC614 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zentropa451Photo

Old Banners, Old Brothers, Old Ways!

🔥4182

17 Jul 2026, 17:48 UTC619 views51 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zentropa451Photo

We cannot give up. We cannot lose hope. We cannot lose heart. The fight is ongoing, it is brutal, it is continuous, and it is fought within. We are the only casualty of this war, and we cannot afford to lose. There are others fighting as well- and we must find them. We must add our strength to theirs, or be obliterated and forgotten. We must raise not a thousand banners, but one. One awful black flag that signifies o

🔥39101👍1

23 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,340 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Zentropa451Photo

« Le Graal est un aimant qui agit à l’horizon, qui donne du relief aux rencontres et qui oblige à regarder au-dedans de soi. Le Graal miroite au bout de toutes les quêtes, pour nous renvoyer finalement à nous-même. » Erik L’Homme Le regard des princes à minuit, éditions Gallimard Jeunesse, coll. Scripto, 2014.

7

23 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC≈1,220 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

The Grail is a magnet that draws us toward the horizon, giving depth to encounters and compelling us to look within ourselves. The Grail shimmers at the end of every quest, only to ultimately lead us back to ourselves.” — Erik L’Homme, Le regard des princes à minuit (2014)

🔥12

6 Jun 2026, 12:05 UTC≈1,560 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @MemoriaNatioPhoto

🇫🇷 Today, Antifa and Jewish organizations are in the streets celebrating D-Day. But we have not forgotten the destruction of our medieval cities in American bombing raids, the thousands of women raped by Afro-Americans soldiers, and the tens of thousands of civilians killed in the name of imposing democracy. 🕊️ @MemoriaNatio

👍35🔥2411👎3

28 Apr 2026, 14:06 UTC≈1,540 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @operationwerewolfofficialPhoto

“Long periods of peace foster certain optical illusions: one is the conviction that the inviolability of the home is grounded in the constitution, which should guarantee it. In reality, it is grounded in the family father, who, sons at his side, fills the doorway with an axe in hand.” - Ernst Jünger, “The Forest Passage”

35🔥17👍4

20 Apr 2026, 14:50 UTC≈1,580 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @operationwerewolfofficialPhoto

New drop is live. SHOP

🔥206

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @baisemahache. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,332,137 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Baise Ma Hache Official” (@baisemahache), 1,701 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baisemahache.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.