Channel
@bahsedagh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,725subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001009810902 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bahsedagh |
| Description | این کانال تابع قوانین نظام مقدس جمهوری اسلامی ایران می باشد و کلیه محتوای کانال اخلاقی،فان و نقداجتماعی می باشد.🇮🇷مطالب منتشر شده در کانال دارای منبع میباشند،مسئولیت محتوی مطالب بعهده نویسنده آن میباشد. |
| Created | 10 November 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bahsedagh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 7,725 | -12 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 7,737 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:13 | 7,738 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 7,742 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 7,742 | first reading |
83 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 83 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 83 (3 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 41,446 |
| Reactions total | 472 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
411 reactions across 64 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 114 | 27.7% | |
| ❤ | 80 | 19.5% | |
| 🤬 | 63 | 15.3% | |
| 💔 | 33 | 8.03% | |
| 😁 | 28 | 6.81% | |
| 👎 | 18 | 4.38% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 3.41% | |
| 🤮 | 13 | 3.16% | |
| 💩 | 12 | 2.92% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 2.19% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.95% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 1.22% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.73% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.487% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.243% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 0.243% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.243% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 0.243% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 83 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 83 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇺🇸 کمیسیون فدرال ارتباطات آمریکا (FCC) در تدارک اعمال ممنوعیت واردات برای فرستنده-گیرندههای نوری ساخت چین است؛ قطعاتی که نقشی حیاتی در مراکز داده هوش مصنوعی ایفا میکنند. تسلط ۵۶ درصدی چین بر بازار میتواند غولهای فناوری آمریکا را با بحران تأمین مواجه سازد. 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍3
خون اهدا کردن یک وظیفه اجتماعی هست ولی در امریکا بابت اهدای خون پول پرداخت میشه که هم یک کمک هست هم تشکر برای تشویق. 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍7👎1👏1
حالا این مصرف سوخت یه النود مدل ۹۱ تو جاده با کولر روشن و بنزین داغونی که الان توزیع میشه، ایران خودرو بجای تولید زباله میومد رو موتور K4M رنو سرمایهگذاری میکرد مصرف بنزین کشور نصف میشد و صنف مکانیک بیکار 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍5
یاده فیلم قورباغه افتادم😐 انگار فیلمایی که دیدیم داره به واقعیت تبدیل میشه! عجب گرفتاری شدیم، هرروز عجیبتر از دیروز😂 نوشته بود : دزدا دیگه قمه نمیکشن زورگیری نمیکنن هیپنوتیسم میکنند هیپنوتیز نیست یک ماده مخدر جدید هست که با افشانه کردن به صورت فوت کردن روی صورت شما باعث میشه که شما کنترل ذهنی خودت را از دست بدی و تمام وسایل را خودت با دست خودت تقدیم طرف میکنی یک گرده هست که تو صورت شما فوت میکنند یا افشانه میکن…
👎2
استفاده مرسدس بنز از اختراع پسر دکتر حسابی پسره پرفسور حسابی: سیستم هوشمند ANC را ایران خودرو و سایپا نخریدن، مجبور شدم به مرسدس بنز بفروشم... 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
❤5👍1
اسم این پدیده «شکاف هذلولی» چتر (یا هر میله صاف و صلب) با زاویه و چرخش مناسب از آن رد میشه، در حالی که به نظر غیرممکنه، با هندسه کارهای خارق العاده ای میشه انجام داد که با شهود غیر ممکن به نظر میرسه. 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👏2
در دوران پریود خون از دست میرود در دوران پریود آهن از دست میرود در دوران بارداری کلسیم از دست میرود در کار بی پایان انرژی از دست میرود در دوران زایمان جان از دست میرود و هنوز هم ب زنان میگویند خیلی حساسی... 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍7👎3
دو بار دیگه پلی کنی یاد میگیری🥰👌 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
اگر در بخش خصوصی کار کنید هر روز از خدا میخواهید که مردم پولدارتر بشن تا بیشتر خرید کنند و وضع شما هم بهتر بشه. اگر در بخش دولتی کار کنید، (بنا به دلایلی که برای خودم هم معلوم نیست) هر روز از خدا میخواهید که مردم بدبختتر بشن تا مرتبه اجتماعیت بره بالاتر. همین یک مورد جهت اثبات برتری بازار آزاد به اقتصاد دولتی کفایت میکنه. 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍3❤1
🔴بعد از این که بانک مرکزی کارمزدهای ساتنا و پایا رو نجومی بالا برد حالا دیگه داره از آب هم کره میگیره آخرین کارشون برای درآمدزایی این بوده که روی برداشت پول از عابربانک ها هم کارمزد گذاشتن! 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
🤬11👎1
اگر واقعا اراده و پشتکار داشته باشید میتونید توی خونه با این چند حرکت ساده ، شکمتون رو تخت کنید این کلیپ رو ذخیره داشته باشد 👌 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
👍2🥱1
عروسی بابا لنگ درازه 😂 فک کنم دهه شصتی وجود نداره که با اینا خاطره نداشته 🆔 @bahsedagh 🔥💯
😁4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 83 posts we hold for @bahsedagh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 796,365 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بحث داااغ | Bahse Dagh” (@bahsedagh), 7,725 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bahsedagh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.