فیش پرداختی خانم قشنگ محمدی( همسر مرحوم منصور ایمانی )
Signed Shahram

Channel
@baghjegaz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
408subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001028150394 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @baghjegaz |
| Created | Between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/baghjegaz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:34 | 408 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:25 | 409 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 412 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:08 | 412 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (29 January 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 479 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 January 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فیش پرداختی خانم قشنگ محمدی( همسر مرحوم منصور ایمانی )
Signed Shahram
53-آقای اهرام محمدی 20.000000میلیون تومان 54-آقای عباس غفاری 30.000000میلیون تومان 55-آقای صمد یعقوبی 30.000000میلیون تومان 56-آقای جهانبخش محمدی 10.000000میلیون تومان 57-آقای صابر شکری 10.000000میلیون تومان 58-تورج شاطرانلو 20.000000میلیون تومان 59-شیرالله بیرقی وپسران 100.000000 صد میلیون تومان 60-آقای الله وردی شاطرانلو 20.000000میلیون تومان 61-آقای اصلان شکری 20.000000میلیون تومان 62-حمید عبدی 15.000000م…
Signed Shahram
لیست افرادی که تا بدین لحظه جهت مشارکت در ساخت حسینیه اعظم شهدای باغجقاز نام نویسی کردن 1-آقای حاجعلی حیدری 1,000,000,000یک میلیاردتومان 2-آقای رضاساعدی وبرادران 200,000,00میلیون 3-آقای سالار پاید ار وبرادران 150,000,000میلیون 4-آقای صالح یعقوبی وبرادران 150،000،000میلیون 5-آقای عینعلی نوری 100،000،000میلیون 6-آقای مهدی پایداروعلیرضا پایدار 100,000,000میلیون 7-آقای کربلایی معرفت وفریبرز ساعدی 100,000,000میل…
Signed Shahram
«مَنْ بَنَی لِلَّهِ مَسْجِداً بَنَی اللَّهُ لَهُ بَیْتاً فِی الْجَنَّةِ» (هر کس برای خدا مسجدی بسازد، خداوند خانهای در بهشت برای او بنا میکند.) اهالی محترم، خیرین گرانقدر، عاشقان اهل بیت (علیهم السلام) و همشهریان باغجقازی مقیم در سراسر میهن اسلامی، با سلام و تحیات، همانگونه که مستحضرید، مساجد و حسینیهها همواره مأمن دلهای مؤمنین و پایگاه نشر معارف الهی بودهاند. متأسفانه، مسجد قدیمی روستای باغجقاز علیا با قدم…
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
حضور دسته عزاداری بر سر مزار شهدا مورخ ۴ تیر ماه ۱۴۰۵ @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
ادامه مسیر گلزار مومنین روز عاشورا مورخ ۴ تیر ماه ۱۴۰۵ @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
ادامه مسیر دسته عزاداری باغجقاز به سمت گلزار مومنین مورخ ۴ تیر ماه ۱۴۰۵ روز عاشورا @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
حرکت دسته عزاداری به سمت مزار شهدا و گلزار مومنین باغجقاز مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۰۴ @baghjegaz
❤1
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
مراسم شاه حسین گویان صبح عاشورا مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۰۴ مقابل مسجد جامع باغجقاز علیا @baghjegaz
❤1
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
شب تاسوعای حسینی با نوای کربلایی ناد قاسمی مورخ ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۰۳ باغجقاز علیا @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
شب تاسوعای حسینی با مداحی کربلایی قادر زمانی چهارشنبه ۱۴۰۵/۰۴/۰۳ باغجقازعلیا @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
ماه محرم سال ۱۳۹۶ @baghjegaz
Signed Fanavari ( IT )
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @baghjegaz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,437,941 of 1,604,598entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“हहा کانال رسمی باغجقاز कह” (@baghjegaz), 408 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/baghjegaz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.