Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

چــاوەکــانــی🖤

@bafr_00

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,367subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001470867684
TypeChannel
Username@bafr_00
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bafr_00

Growth

1,3671,3701,368.56 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,369 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,370 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,367 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,367–1,370 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 15:071,367-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:421,370+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:011,369no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:541,369first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.07%
avg views ÷ 1,367 subscribers
Avg views / post
83.0
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.649%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total498
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1076.9%
👏215.4%
🔥17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC6 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بۆ بینینی جوانترین و نوێترین پۆستەکان، جۆینی ئەم چەناڵانەی خوارەوە بن🩵🌞، «بۆ بەژداریکردن لە لیست کەناڵی سەروو 1k» @s4r_a

Signed ﮼دیڤە،لیست🖤!

2 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC46 viewsread 6 August 2026

هیچ شتێک نییە کە ئارامم بکاتەوە جــگە لە تـۆ ، تۆش کە نیت.... هەزار و یەک شەو خەیاڵـم کرد بۆ تـۆیەک کە تەنانەت یەک شـەویش نەمبـوویت ، ئەوەی کە دڵـتەنگی تۆم دانپێـدانانی دەوێت مەگـەر؟ دڵـم دەیویسـت ببمە خانوویەک بـۆت کـە هەرکـات ماندوو دەبوویت بگەڕایتایەوە بـۆ مـن.... هیچ نەبێـت وەرە خەونـم دڵ کە نازانێـت تۆ ڕۆیشـتووی ، بەغەمـی تۆوە ئەسیرم تۆیەک کە ئاگات لـە من نییە ، مـن دەزانـم کە تـۆ مەحاڵیت بەڵام دیسانەوە هەر دەمە

2 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC49 viewsread 6 August 2026

ڕاستیەک هەیە ئەوەی سەری بۆخودا نزم بکات ، خودا سەری بەرز دەکات ❤

30 Jul 2026, 07:16 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026

ئه‌زانم ژیان هه‌ندێ شتی پێ نه‌دایت ؛ كه‌ له‌ ناخی دڵه‌وه‌ ئه‌تویست ، هه‌ندێ خه‌ونی لێ سه‌ندیت كه‌ به‌ سه‌د دڵ هیوات بۆ به‌دی هاتنیان ئه‌خواست به‌ڵام تۆ هه‌ر چه‌ندێك ئازارت چه‌شتووه‌ نه‌كه‌ی سارد ببیته‌وه‌ به‌ پێچه‌وانه‌وه‌ هه‌موو توانای خۆت كۆبكه‌ره‌وه‌ تا شتی زۆر زیاتر و گه‌وره‌تری لێ بسه‌نیت بزانه کە له‌ قوڵایی ڕۆحتا هێشتا توانا و هێزێكی بێ وێنه‌ هه‌یه‌..

20 Jul 2026, 21:43 UTC154 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

بە بڕوای من گۆڕانکاری خیانەت نییە لە ڕابردوو، بەڵکو ڕاستگۆییە لەگەڵ بووندا. ئەوەی دەڵێت 'گۆڕاویت'، نەیتوانیوە لەگەڵ پەڕینەوەی تۆدا بەرەو ڕۆشنایی هۆشیاری سەربکەوێت، بۆیە زیندانی دەستکەوتەکانی ڕابردووی خۆیی و دەیەوێت تۆش لە شوێنپێی دوێنێدا بەند بکات. مرۆڤ وەک بەرد نییە تا نەگۆڕێت؛ مرۆڤ ئاگرێکە لە دەمارەکانیدا. ئازارەکان نامانشکێنن، بەڵکو لێوارە تیژەکانمان دەسڕنەوە تا ببڕین. ئێمە نەگۆڕاوین بۆ ئەوەی ڕەقتر ببڕین، گۆڕاوین

1

17 Jul 2026, 19:50 UTC158 viewsread 6 August 2026

ڕۆژێک دێت تێدەگەیت کە تۆ بەڕاستی شایەنی دڵخۆشیت ، شایەنی ئەوەیت لە شتێکی دڵنیایدا بیت نەک نیوە ، تێدەگەیت ئەکرا دڵخۆشی خۆت بە هاتن و ڕۆشتنی هیچ کەس و شتێکەوە نەبەستیتەوە و خۆت دروستی بکەیت ، وە فێردەبیت لەبەر خۆت دەستبەرداری زۆر شت بیت بەبێ ئەوەی پەشیمان بیتەوە ، ڕۆژێک و لە نێوەندی ڕووداوێکی ناخۆشی ژیانتدا دادەنیشیت و بەخۆت ئەڵێیت : “من شایستەی ئەمە نیم” مرۆڤ ئەو کاتە ژیانی دەگۆڕێت کە بەڕاستی نرخی خۆی ئەزانێت و لەو

26 Jun 2026, 20:48 UTC288 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

کاتێک کەسـێـک ئەمرێت ھـێشـتـا ژیان بەردەوامە بەڵام کاتێک لێمان دوور ئەکەوێتەوە و ژیان ئـەوەسـتـێ.. سەیر ئەوەیە مردن میھرەبانترە لە دووری چـونکە مردن یەکلاکەرەوەیە بەڵام دووری پـڕە لـە ئـەگـەر ◟ .

22 May 2026, 21:51 UTC510 viewsread 6 August 2026

ئاگاداری دڵی بەرامبەرتان بن ئێمە نازانین مرۆڤەکان بەچیدا تێپەڕدەبن ، ئەو پیاوەی کە ئەیبنیت پێ ئەکەنێت بەڕووی تۆ نازانی دوێنێ چی کێشەیەکی گەورەی هەبووە قەرزەکان لەسەری کەڵەکەبووە ، ئەو ژنە پیرەی کە بەردەوام لە کۆڵان ئەیبینی ڕەنگە ئەمڕۆ کەمێک بێتاقەت بێت لەبەر ئەوەی کچ و کوڕەکەی لە دەرەوەی شارن دەمێکە نەیبنیوون ، ئەو منداڵەی کە بەردەوام پێدەکەنێت ئەمڕۆ کز و ماتە ڕەنگە هۆکاری ئەوە بێت کە بە ماڵەوەی ووتوە حەزم لە

18 May 2026, 21:03 UTC414 viewsread 6 August 2026

نەک هەر ئەم ڕۆژانه بەڵکو هەمیشه ئەو هەستەم هەبووە که مرۆڤ بۆچی ئەبێت وەڵامی هەموو شتێک بداتەوە؟ بۆچی ئەبێ ئەم قسە و باسانە و پڕوپاگەندە بێ ئەنجامانە درێژەیان پێ بدرێت؟ گریمان کەسێک قسەیەکی ناحەق بکات وەڵام دانەوەی من چ سودێکی بۆم ئەبێت؟ هیچ تەنها وزەم لێ سەرف ئەکات ئەگەر وەڵامی بدەمەوە ئەم ڕۆژانە لە بارودۆخێکی تایبەتدا بەسەر ئەبەم بەفەخریشەوە واناڵێم ، جیهانێکی شەخسیه ! تەواوی فکر و هۆشم ئەو دونیایەیە که تێیدا ئەژیم

3 May 2026, 21:34 UTC468 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

هەوڵبدە ئەو ئارەزووە کەم بکەیتەوە ؛ کە وات لێدەکات بەردەوام چاودێری مۆبایلەکەت بکەیت ، ئەگەر کەسێک دەستپێشخەری نەکردووە تا نامەیەکت بۆ بنێرێت یان کاتی بۆ تەرخان نەکردوویت ئەوا قبووڵی بکە ، سەرنجەکانت ئاراستەی ئەو کەسانە بکە کە نرخت دەزانن و لە پێشینە دایان ناویت ، ئەوە هێزێکە بۆ پاشەکشەکردن و هەڵسەنگاندنی پەیوەندییەکان خۆش دەکات لە بەرامبەر هەوڵ و بەرژەوەندییەکانتدا ، خۆشگوزەرانی خۆت لە پێشینە دابنێ و کات بۆ ئەو کەسا

2🔥1

28 Apr 2026, 22:09 UTC491 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

پێمخۆشە وەک چۆن ژیان لە گەروی من گیری کردووە، نە دەڕواتە خوارەوە و نە دێتە سەرەوە، منیش ئەوھا لەگەروی ژیان گیر بکەم. کاتێک ئەو نامەیەی مارکیزم خوێندەوە کە تێیدا ناوی ئەو شتانەی ھێنابوو کە کەیفی پێھاتبوون، منیش بڕیارمدا لە نامەیەکدا ناوی ئەو شتانە بێنم کە خۆشمدەوێن و ھێشتاش دەتوانم چێژیان لێوەرگرم. بینیم ھێشتاش دەتوانم تەماشای تێرمیناتۆری ٢ بکەم، ھێشتاش دەتوانم گوێ لە جگەرەکانی دوای سێکس بگرم، دەتوانم بخۆم و کەمتر بخە

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bafr_00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 498,691 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“چــاوەکــانــی🖤” (@bafr_00), 1,367 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bafr_00.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.