Channel
@badplanet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,629subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001058303715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @badplanet |
| Created | 31 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/badplanet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 5,629 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 5,631 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:51 | 5,630 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 5,631 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 5,631 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 4 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
507 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 264 | 52.1% | |
| 🔥 | 165 | 32.5% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 7.50% | |
| 👌 | 23 | 4.54% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 1.18% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.18% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 0.986% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 507reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 4 November 2025 to 29 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @badplanet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 November 2025 to 29 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А теперь новость года. Мой последний фильм про биостанцию Анива будет показан на закрытии Beat Film Festival в Москве 14 июня. Ну и вишенкой на торте у них еще кадр из фильма - заглавный программы. Приходите на показ. Со времен закрытия Центра Док Кино это мое грандиозное возвращение в кинозалы. Билеты по ссылке: https://beatfilmfestival.ru/movies/biostanciya-aniva-delo-dlinnoy-voli
❤64👍38🔥38🥰6❤🔥5
До начала фестиваля — меньше недели: Beat пройдет в Москве с 4 по 14 июня! О чем фильмы программы в этом году? Как всегда — в фокусе современная культура: ее ритмы, герои, переломные моменты и идеи, продолжающие менять оптику времени 🩵 Чтобы ориентироваться в программе было проще, мы разделили фильмы на условные «категории»: архитектура, мода, музыка (куда же Beat без нее!), хиты прошлых лет и не только. Полный с…
❤18
Ребята, я вам совсем ничего не рассказывал (потому что надо меня в инсте читать). Но у меня уже готов новый фильм о жизни на биостанции Анива. Я в Тбилиси, в Грузии. И к выходным поеду в Шато Шапито, устрою там небольшой показ для тех кто доедет. Я каждый год так делаю. Если вы где-то тут то приезжайте
🔥37❤24🎉6
В эту субботу к нам снова прилетает наш друг — режиссёр Саша Федоров aka Badplanet. Он покажет нам свой новый фильм "Биостанция Анива" про @aniva_bio. Когда Саша прислал мне описание, на секунду показалось что это про жизнь в Шато Шапито: "На самом юге Сахалина, там, где остров обрывается в Японское море узким каменным клином строится новая биостанция. Пока это не готовый научный центр, а место, где всё начинается …
🔥26❤14
У меня вышел новый фильм. Бегите смотреть. Кстати новый фильм с Сахалина будет с теми же героями, только еще их больше будет и еще масштабнее и веселее, и еще больше подводного мира. Ну и Сахалин жеж https://youtu.be/TOhvLClCY9A
❤71🔥37
Ребята, проект Юры и Владимира Бурканова - героев фильма про изменение численности морских млекопитающих на Курилах и всем Дальнем Востоке участвует в конкурсе, и я пытаюсь помочь им собрать голоса. Проголосуйте кто сможет
👌23❤5
Приветсвую! Наш проект вошел в число финалистов федеральной Премии «Больше, чем путешествие». Мы успешно прошли защиту в рамках очного этапа Премии, но для победы осталось набрать несколько сотен голосов в онлайн-голосовании ВКонтакте😳 Будем очень благодарны за вашу поддержку 🫂❤️ Необходимо перейти по этой ссылке и проголосовать за проект «Смотри экспедиции» в номинации «Больше, чем медиа»: https://vk.com/votinga…
❤41
Ребята, я послезавтра буду с небольшой лекцией в Барселоне. Если ваши друзья там, то присылайте и сами приходите
❤15
Начинаем утро с истории о племенах 🌍🎥 Скоро у нас состоится лекция о племенах и встреча с документалистом Александром Федоровым. Это будет разговор о мире, который исчезает прямо у нас на глазах. Всего осталось два региона, где ещё живут архаичные культуры — долина Амазонки и остров Новая Гвинея. Но процесс вестернизации ускоряется. Александр Федоров показывает, как именно происходит эта трансформация и как собстве…
🔥27❤12
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @badplanet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 509,818 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BadPlanet” (@badplanet), 5,629 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/badplanet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.