Channel
@bad_mint_on
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
137subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002191836121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bad_mint_on |
| Description | Про аирдропы и темки Здесь вы найдёте: - моё видение по проектам - полезные инструменты - важные технические аспекты крипты - помощь с решением ваших вопросов и проблем Не даю инвест. рекомендаций, всегда проводите свой ресёрч Чат: @bad_mint_on_chat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bad_mint_on |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 137 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 137 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
192 reactions across 14 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 75 | 39.1% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 16.1% | |
| ❤ | 29 | 15.1% | |
| custom 5395429988449149408 | 17 | 8.85% | |
| 🤓 | 11 | 5.73% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 3.65% | |
| ✍ | 6 | 3.13% | |
| custom 5238171199720146323 | 5 | 2.60% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.56% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 1.56% | |
| custom 5330357265364966516 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.521% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.521% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 192reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 12 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мой хороший знакомый – экономист и по совместительству админ крутого паблика про крипту – разыгрывает 175$ за прохождение 3-5 минутного теста Тест кстати довольно интересный – тебе предстоит принять 10 инвестиционных решений и потерять как можно меньшую часть начального гипотетического депозита :) Дублирую ссылку на тест для удобства: https://tilburgss.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_cvy7tqhIhq1K0ke *для участия розы…
Иррациональное поведение на финансовых рынках Или почему мы так привязаны к своим сумкам? Представьте: вы купили актив, и его цена упала. Что вы сделаете? Большинство людей не спешат продавать — ждут, пока цена "отскочит", чтобы хотя бы выйти в ноль. А вот если актив вырос, наоборот, возникает желание продать как можно скорее и зафиксировать прибыль. Узнаёте себя? Это поведение иррационально и называется dispositio…
❤6
Какая-то контора запустила коллабу с Sahara, за минт их бейджа (1.6$ в сети Polygon) они позволяют бесплатно минтить нфтшку в сети Sahara Testnet с бесконечным сапплаем. Возможно, оно того не стоит, но я с мейна сминтил для разнообразия Сайт с минтом: https://www.nerzo.xyz/sahara Твит с анонсом: https://x.com/_nerzo_/status/1898125485743460359 Заодно бейдж даёт возможность минта фришки на монаде (есть и не фришка),…
👍4
😃 Итак, крутим Сахару 😃 Пост с мотивацией читай тут 1. Заходим на сайт с краном, коннектим кош (от сибилов сделали ограничение на холд хотя бы 0.01 ETH в сети Ethereum – вообще, всегда держите столько на основных кошах, часто пригождается), добавляем тестовую сеть и запрашиваем токены (токены могут прийти не сразу, бывают очереди). Повторяем каждые 24ч 2. Заходим сюда, переходим в Gobi Bear и делаем социалки 1) Dai…
❤6🔥2
На какой проект хотите гайд по отработке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 53954299884491494089
Разбираем самые топовые тестнеты. Tier-S ⌨️ ⚔️ Sahara AI – внушительный инвест по большей части от Tier-1 фондов – внятный современный продукт: вкратце, это платформа для управления жизненным циклом AI (сбор, обучение, развёртывание, поддержка, монетизация и пр.) – прямой подтверждённости токена и аирдропа я не нашёл, но проект запускает собственную сеть, поэтому и TGE, а также раздача токенов за активности в сети, …
custom 53954299884491494088custom 52381711997201463235custom 53303572653649665162
Добиваем 50 +++ и делаю ✨ UPD: 50 есть, готовлю ресёрчик ✏️
🔥12
Интересен подробный обзор на проекты из тирлиста?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥6
🤔 Фулл растировочка всех актуальных тестнетов 🤔 Пару слов о самих тестнетах для тех, кто от этой темы далёк Зачем нужны тестнеты? Перед выходом проекта в мейннет – будь то запуск своей основной сети или своего продукта на базе существующей сети, или ещё как – проект выкатывает тестовую среду, полностью его имитирующую. Что позволяет разработчикам, валидаторам и юзерам всё это дело протестировать, чтобы гораздо мень…
👍16✍6🔥4🙏1
Уже дважды обновил методичку. Пользуйся, братишка 😘 Методичка по бриджам (мостам) #tools #baza
🔥24🤓11🏆7
📣 Несколько апдейтов по каналу 📣 Команда собрана 🤝🤝 Кому не отписал – не принимайте на личный счёт, на самом деле был определённый верхний порог по числу участников + несколько людей получили личное приглашение и приняли его. К тому же все, кто откликался на воркера, не получили приглашение, ибо было принято совместное решение, что на данном этапе лучше обсудить узким кругом предстоящую деятельность и формат взаимод…
❤13🔥7🫡3👍1
МонЕТНый Вор pinned «Итак, с приходом бычки больше нет времени на раскачку. Я горю этой идеей с лета, но в какой-то момент просто начало казаться, что делать в крипте нечего. Но сейчас всё перевернулось и я в срочном порядке адпатируюсь, а именно – я собираю команду для совместных…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @bad_mint_on. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
На какой проект хотите гайд по отработке?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Интересен подробный обзор на проекты из тирлиста?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 12 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МонЕТНый Вор” (@bad_mint_on), 137 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bad_mint_on.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.