Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 40 days, net +156. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,409–3,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 14:41
3,590
+17
12 Sept 2026, 08:39
3,573
+6
8 Sept 2026, 09:38
3,567
+40
2 Sept 2026, 20:34
3,527
+3
31 Aug 2026, 05:27
3,524
+7
28 Aug 2026, 03:45
3,517
+11
24 Aug 2026, 21:25
3,506
+11
21 Aug 2026, 03:23
3,495
+4
18 Aug 2026, 01:04
3,491
+25
14 Aug 2026, 17:55
3,466
+18
11 Aug 2026, 02:52
3,448
+15
8 Aug 2026, 04:17
3,433
-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:48
3,434
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:33
3,434
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 04s
Average length
4m 13s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
633 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
457
72.2%
🔥
102
16.1%
👏
39
6.16%
🙏
8
1.26%
❤🔥
4
0.632%
😈
4
0.632%
🥰
4
0.632%
🫡
4
0.632%
🍾
3
0.474%
👀
3
0.474%
🤓
2
0.316%
👨💻
1
0.158%
💔
1
0.158%
🙊
1
0.158%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📓 ویژگی کلاس آنلاین و آفلاین ارشد بهداشت ۴۰۶
🔸آیا کلاس آفلاین خلاصه تر هست؟
‼️کلاس آفلاین ۴۰ساعت، کلاس آنلاین ۵۲ ساعت هست؛ بخاطر سوالات درلحظه دانشجویان سر کلاس این اختلاف ساعتی بوجود میاد
🔹آیا در کلاس آنلاین مطالب جامع تر از آفلاین هست؟
🔸خدماتی که با شرکت در کلاس ما در اختیارتون قرار میگیره، چه مواردی هستند؟
🔹کلاس ضبط شده سال قبله؟ ویدئو یا ویس؟
🔹 تشابه ضریب ۱،۵ یک بار برای همیشه!
💠 اگر سوالی بود که تو ویس توض…
مقاله اورجینال ما در حوزه "بررسی فنوتیپی و ژنوتیپی اتوترنسپورتر و بیوفیلم در نمونه های اشریشیاکلای جداشده از بیماران پیوندی" در کنگره آزمایشگاه و بالین به عنوان مقاله برتر باکتری شناسی اعلام شد💯
زحمت ارائه رو خانم مقدس زاده (همکار طرح) دانشجوی ارشد میکروب پزشکی دانشگاه ایران که سال ۴۰۳ دانشجوی من بودن کشیدن🌟
تحلیل سوال کنکور 👆🏼👆🏼
این ویس رو خیلی تاکیید می کنم
نکته اش در دکتری سال ۴۰۳ هم برای چندمین بار سوال طرح شد. ممکنه ارشد ۴۰۵ مجدد مطرح بشه.
با این تحلیل، یک بار برای همیشه باکتری هایی که وارد خون می شوند و باکتری هایی که وارد خون نمی شوند رو یاد بگیرید.
نکته بیلی اسکات:
تو بخش کمپیلوباکتر، جدولی ارائه شده که میگه ک. ژژونی هم موجب درگیری خونی می شود، این سوال با نکته بیلی اسکات زیر سوال میره، طراح سوال رو اشتباه طرح…
خستگی رو با درصد دانشجوها در آزمون های جامع در میکنیم🚑
طراح سوالات باکتری بنده نبودم ولی برای دانشجوهای ما فرقی نداره💯✅️
ایشالا درخشش همه داوطلبین در روز کنکور
سلام استاد وقتتون بخیر استاد واقعا لذت بردم وخیلی قوت قلب گرفتم که قسمت هایی که شما در تدریستون تاکید کردین داخل سوالات کنکور میاد سوالات وزارت علوم روکه بررسی میکردم از کلیات دقیقا ازساختار فلاژل که تاکیید کردین اومده بود مرسی که هستین استاد 🌺🙏
طی این دورانی که افتخار تدریس در کنار دانشجوها رو دارم، همیشه سعی کردم ذهن دانشجوها رو آکادمیک تربیت کنم، سعی کردم فکر نکنن سوادشون محدود به ۴تا جزوه ای هست که میخونن و قبول میشن، راه طولانی تر هست و تو مقطع ارشد باید خودشون رو بسازن.
تو #کنگره آزمایشگاه و بالین امسال، یکی از پروژه هایی که بنده به عنوان دانشجوی دکتری در پاستور انجام دادم و در ایران #اولین_بار هست که انجام میشه رو در کنار همکاری قبولی #ایمنی دانشگاه …
موفقیت مادرزادی نیست، اکتسابیه؛ درجریانی دیگه؟
هرجا ناامید شدی به این فکر کن که چندماه دیگه، بهمن ماه، وارد مقطع جدیدی از زندگیت میشی.
جا نزن، اشکالاتت رو پیدا کن، رفع کن، و ادامه بده🌟🎯
✅ ۱۲۰ روز تا کنکور و آخرین تلنگر برای درس باکتری شناسی
🪫 قراره با یک دوره ۱۲۰ روزه در خدمت دانشجوهایی باشم که هنوز برای باکتری فکری نکردن
🪔 خواهش میکنم این کلیپ از توضیحات رو مشاهده کنید، حتی اگر تصمیم به شرکت در دوره کلاسی من ندارید… خیلی مهمه عزیزان
🧫 باکتری شناسی کریم بخش
#نمونه_تدریس
تدریس مفهومی تهاجم و فاگوسیت شدن شیگلا
🌺🌺🌺🌺
🧫 باکتری شناسی کریم بخش
❤8🔥7👨💻1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @bacteri_karimbakhsh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
برای جداسازی بورخولدریا از خلط، کدام یک از محیط های انتخابی زیر توصیه می شود؟ فلوشیپ ۴۰۴
XLD19%
TCBS30%
EMB12%
باسیتراسین لاکتوز آگار39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اخبار IAU (دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ) @IAzadUN · 38,139 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“باکتری شناسی کریم بخش” (@bacteri_karimbakhsh), 3,590 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bacteri_karimbakhsh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.