Channel name was changed to «⋆ ^᪲᪲᪲𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗂 ♡̶ ִֶָ .🎀(rest)»

Channel
⋆ ^᪲᪲᪲𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗂 ♡̶ ִֶָ .🎀(rest)
@babybunkook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,301subscribers
-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002001580449 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babybunkook |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babybunkook |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 2,301 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:36 | 2,319 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 2,335 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 2,351 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 2,355 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,355 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 44s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,418 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😭 | 612 | 43.2% | |
| custom 5796214453653479443 | 340 | 24.0% | |
| 🍓 | 333 | 23.5% | |
| 💅 | 84 | 5.92% | |
| 💘 | 49 | 3.46% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
🍓66😭32custom 57962144536534794439💘6
واقعا نمیدونم چطوری باید اینو بنویسم... قلبم و دستام میلرزه و بغض داره خفهم میکنه اما فکر کنم مجبورم. من از وقتی اینجارو زدم خیلی خیلی خاطرات قشنگی رو دارم و احساسی که به اینجا و مخصوصا به شما نینیهای قشنگم داشتم رو هیچوقت فراموش نمیکنم... من انقدر بهتون علاقه داشتم و توی زندگیِ آریما به قدری تاثیر میذاشتید که نمیتونم حتی توصیفش کنم. اونقدر زیاد بود که میدونم این احساس متقابل نبود به هرحال، فکر میکنم وقتشه یکم…
😭153custom 579621445365347944325🍓5💘5
راستش بابتش معذرت میخوام اما باید یک چیزی رو بهتون بگم
😭65🍓7💘3custom 57962144536534794433
سلام نینیهای من
custom 579621445365347944362🍓6😭3💘2
taekook as nick judy is so canon and actually approved by them🥺
🍓72😭20custom 579621445365347944312💘6💅4
Jungkook for real :
😭59custom 579621445365347944315🍓6💅3💘3
─── 🌸 🤩 𝖽𝗈𝗅𝗅 . co𖹭kіе 👄 ֺ
custom 579621445365347944366🍓15😭5💘4💅2
╎ ㅤ𖹭🌸᳕֟፝ㅤֺㅤׅ baby 🔤ooki꯭eᅠ 🎀 𓎠𓎠ᅠ
custom 579621445365347944367🍓18💘6😭3💅2
پاهای خوش فرم و خوشگلت تو کل وجود بدخواهات عزیزم 🙏🏻 ( لازم بود گفته بشه ، شب بخیر ناز دخترا💕)
💅53custom 579621445365347944313🍓5💘1
Signed α𝗋ꙇɥαn
: that man's long legs are incredibly beautiful, attractive, and fvcking sexy !!▫️
😭64custom 579621445365347944318🍓4💅2💘2
Signed α𝗋ꙇɥαn
تق تق ! کسی خونه هست ؟؟
🍓45custom 579621445365347944311💘7
Signed α𝗋ꙇɥαn
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @babybunkook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 785,341 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⋆ ^᪲᪲᪲𝖻𝗎𝗇𝗀𝗈𝗈𝗄𝗂 ♡̶ ִֶָ .🎀(rest)” (@babybunkook), 2,301 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babybunkook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.