🎾🏀
custom 5778552826577817905117🔥65❤38🍓3❤🔥2🕊2

Channel
@babkevich9
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
2,857subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002136572594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babkevich9 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babkevich9 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 2,857 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:41 | 2,859 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 2,859 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,635 reactions across 8 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 607 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 404 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5778552826577817905 | 252 | 15.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 191 | 11.7% | |
| ⚡ | 47 | 2.87% | |
| 🏆 | 37 | 2.26% | |
| 💋 | 27 | 1.65% | |
| custom 5231197925178089666 | 26 | 1.59% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 0.673% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 0.55% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 0.489% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 0.245% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.183% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 0.183% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.122% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.061% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.061% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.061% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.061% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,635reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 22 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @babkevich9. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 22 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎾🏀
custom 5778552826577817905117🔥65❤38🍓3❤🔥2🕊2
☀️
❤🔥168custom 577855282657781790551🔥30❤9👍5😍3🍓2💋1
🌻
🔥229❤96custom 577855282657781790556❤🔥7💋6🥰6⚡5🍓3
⭐️Символическая сборная мужской Суперлиги сезона 2025/26 — определена После завершения чемпионата эксперты, болельщики и тренеры подвели итоги сезона, выбрав игроков, которые ярче других проявили себя на площадке. Именно голоса главных тренеров клубов стали решающими при формировании символической семёрки. В состав лучших вошли: 🔷 Связующий — Павел Панков, «Динамо» 🦁 Диагональный — Владислав Бабкевич, «Зенит» ⚡️ …
❤54🔥18🏆10custom 57785528265778179056💋2💘2⚡1🤩1
🔥 Делали красиво. Делали результат Завершилось определение лучших игроков сезона российской мужской Суперлиги. В течение 10 дней после финальных серий свои варианты называли эксперты и болельщики, но итоговое слово осталось за главными тренерами клубов Именно тренеры сформировали семёрку игроков, чьё мастерство, стабильность и влияние на игру стали главным аргументом в борьбе за место в символической сборной сезона…
❤53🔥14🏆7⚡1🍓1💋1custom 57785528265778179051
Сборная регулярки и сборная плей-офф⚡️ *по мнению все того же Алмаза Хаирова Кто хочет почитать подробнее про каждого игрока, загляните на БОспорт👈 «Экспертных» мнений много не бывает и по этому 1❤️ и составляю собственные сборные регулярки и плей-офф чемпионата VolleyFans🤩
❤93🏆15💋9❤🔥4🔥4custom 57785528265778179054🥴3⚡1
Лидеры чемпионата мужской Суперлиги по индивидуальным показателям 😎 🔵 МАХ | ⭐ Поддержать 📡 ВК | 🌐 Сайт
🔥89❤40custom 577855282657781790513❤🔥3💋3🥰2⚡1🍓1
Поздравляем Влада и Женю в комментариях с попаданием в символическую сборную Суперлиги💙🤍
🔥158⚡38custom 523119792517808966626❤21❤🔥7🏆5💋5👍4
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @babkevich9. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vladislav Babkevich” (@babkevich9), 2,857 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babkevich9.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.