Channel
@babeltower_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,083subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003006171839 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babeltower_tg |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babeltower_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,083 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 2,082 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 2,084 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 2,084 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,540 |
| Reactions total | 248 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
127 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 41 | 32.3% | |
| 👍 | 34 | 26.8% | |
| ❤ | 24 | 18.9% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 11.0% | |
| ⚡ | 13 | 10.2% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.787% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Монеты Аршака I послужили прототипом для всех последующих монет династии Аршакидов. ♦️Их внешний вид был заимствован у Селевкидов и некоторых ранних сатрапов времён династии Ахеменидов, однако внесённые первым парфянским царём новшества позволили отличить его монеты от предыдущих. 🔹На своих денежных знаках Аршак носит одеяние сакского покроя, но при этом сидит на табурете (на ранних монетах) или омфале (на более по…
⚡2❤2👍1👏1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🏛️Гекатомпил ( Ἑκατόμπυλος) или Саддарвазех) — исторический город в западной части Хорасана, древняя столица Парфии (в сер. III века до н. э.), 1260 стадий на северо-восток от Каспийских ворот. ♦️Его точное местоположение неизвестно, но большинство ученых считает, что он находился в районе нынешнего Шах-Руд (или же Шахp-и Кумис) около города Дамган. 🔹Древнее туземное название города неизвестно; греческое и персидск…
👍2🔥2⚡1❤1👏1
Posted without readable text
В силу отсутствия регулярного войска отсутствовала и чёткая структура вооружённых сил в парфянском государстве. ♦️Каждый наместник, сатрап, вассальный царь или вождь племени организовывал структуру своих подразделений исходя из собственных возможностей. Также отсутствовало понятие единого централизованного командования — только в единичных случаях царь непосредственно руководил войсками как главнокомандующий, в боль…
🔥5❤2👍2👏1
Posted without readable text
♦️Парфянская армия была ярким отражением самой сути и действительности Парфянского царства, со всеми его преимуществами и недостатками. 🔹Она наиболее ярко выражала настрой парфянского общества, его взгляды и мировоззрение. Как и само Парфянское царство, его вооружённые силы, несомненно, обладая высочайшими качествами, при этом были также сильно подвергнуты влиянию тех или иных течений в обществе и исторических событ…
🔥6👍3❤2⚡1👏1
Posted without readable text
♦️Монеты Андрагора — эллинистические золотые статеры и серебряные тетрадрахмы с именем Андрагора, относящиеся к Амударьинскому кладу («Сокровище Окса») и к крупнейшему кладу монет Мир Заках II. 🔹Согласно мнению большинства исследователей, монеты были отчеканены одним из селевкидских сатрапов Парфии, почувствовавшим себя достаточно независимым для выпуска монет со своим именем, возможно, Андрагором, который, согласно…
❤2👍2⚡1👏1🔥1
Posted without readable text
👑Андрагор (Ανδραγόρας) — последний селевкидский сатрап Парфиены и Гиркании с приблизительно 270 года до н. э.; возможно, независимый правитель Парфии с около 256/247 по около 235 годы до н. э. 💀Согласно утверждению Юстина, погиб в войне с вторгшимися в Парфию Аршакидами. ♦️На основании совокупности имеющихся сведений отечественные археологи-востоковеды И. М. Дьяконов и Е. В. 3еймаль в совместной работе 1988 года сф…
🔥3👍2⚡1❤1👏1
Историки выделяют несколько возможных причин, которые заставили греков отказаться от дальнейшей войны за Парфию. 🔥Это могло быть восстание Стратоники Македонской, либо окончание перемирия с Антиохом Гиераксом и его вторжение в Месопотамию. Первой версии придерживались Низе, Альтхайм, Гиршман, Гутшмид и др., второй — Э. Бивен, Бокщанин и др. ⚡Одним из возможных результатов похода парфян мог стать плен Селевка II. О …
❤3🔥3👍2⚡1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @babeltower_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 20,031 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вавилонская Башня 🏛” (@babeltower_tg), 2,083 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babeltower_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.