Video message, posted without a caption
😁3custom 54045465418662239203❤2

Channel
@babanyurawisdom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002529055089 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @babanyurawisdom |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/babanyurawisdom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 226 | +6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 220 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 217 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 217 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 504 |
| Reactions total | 62 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
193 reactions across 15 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 15.5% | |
| custom 5404546541866223920 | 28 | 14.5% | |
| custom 5407115293086482170 | 23 | 11.9% | |
| 😁 | 20 | 10.4% | |
| ❤ | 18 | 9.33% | |
| custom 5408847547886241190 | 15 | 7.77% | |
| custom 5408919900905309120 | 14 | 7.25% | |
| 🤓 | 10 | 5.18% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 4.66% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 4.15% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 3.11% | |
| custom 5406590044355989710 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 1.04% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 0.518% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.518% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
😁3custom 54045465418662239203❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥4custom 54071152930864821704custom 54089199009053091202😁1
«ТОПОВЫЙ» БИОГРАФ Последнее время на просторах форумов часто вижу заявления, что ценность авторского контента падает и падает. Искусственный интеллект стал настолько хорош, что уже невозможно отличить, где текст создан человеком, а где — нейронкой. То же самое относится к видео, картинкам и аудио. Меня, конечно, больше всего интересует текст. Его и генерить легче всего, как будто бы. Речь идет уже не о маленьких эс…
custom 54088475478862411902❤1👍1😱1
Любите дождь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ЛЕТНИЙ ДОЖДЬ В этом году в Роли выдались очень сухие весна и начало лета. Пересыхали речки и пожарные пруды. В какой-то момент городские службы даже попросили жителей ограничить полив газонов и мойку машин. Для Америки — почти нонсенс. И вот наконец-то полило. Несколько дней подряд — мощные грозы и дождь стеной. В детстве дождь не любила. Потом тоже — когда приходилось ездить на работу на общественном транспорте. …
custom 54045465418662239204custom 54071152930864821704custom 54089199009053091204❤2
ЛЕТНИЙ TODO-ЛИСТ Е-мае! Уже август! В детско-подростковом возрасте каждое лето у меня в ВК появлялся альбом «Лето — маленькая жизнь». И оно правда таким было. Сборы, лагеря, Клязьма, прогулки с родителями, друзья, новые знакомства. Каждое лето казалось отдельной маленькой жизнью. Сейчас все немного иначе. Кажется, именно поэтому взрослые так часто говорят, что «профукали лето». Видимо, отсюда и появились бесконечн…
❤3custom 54071152930864821703👍2custom 54045465418662239202🔥1
REST VS gRPC: ДВА СПОСОБА ЗАКАЗАТЬ ПИЦЦУ Когда два приложения хотят обмениваться данными, им нужен общий язык. Сегодня чаще всего для этого используют REST или gRPC. Оба подхода решают одну и ту же задачу, но делают это совершенно по-разному. Представим, что мы разрабатываем мобильное приложение для сети пиццерий. Приложение — это клиент. Сервер — место, где хранится меню, создаются заказы, назначаются курьеры и ра…
🔥5custom 54088475478862411903❤1👎1custom 54045465418662239201custom 54071152930864821701custom 54089199009053091201
ТОП СПОРТСМЕНОВ В ДОМАШНЕМ ФИТНЕСЕ Почти год хожу в один и тот же большой фитнес-зал. За это время накопился личный рейтинг самых колоритных постоянных посетителей. 1️⃣Мега-женщина Про себя перед ней всегда мысленно извиняюсь. На ягодичный мост она собирает почти все блины в зале. Делает на изи. Потом этот же вес пытается поднять ее мужчина. И... он тоже начинает извиняться. На приседе и жиме история повторяется.…
🤣6custom 54045465418662239203custom 54071152930864821702🤪1
ВСЕ ТЕННИСИСТЫ БОГАЧИ? ПРАВДА ИЛИ МИФ? Давайте еще немного поговорим про теннис. Играла с детства и, конечно, мечтала стать великой теннисисткой. Почему мечтала? Все еще мечтаю! Кажется, что большие спортсмены — это люди, у которых все сложилось. Попал в тур — все, обеспечен до конца жизни. Давайте разберемся, так ли это на самом деле. Сразу уберем за скобки Федерера, Джоковича и Алькараса. У этих ребят действительн…
😢8🔥3custom 54088475478862411903custom 54045465418662239202custom 54071152930864821702custom 54065900443559897101
CINCINNATI OPEN 2026 Новый формат! Решила рассказать о плане путешествия до самой поездки. Вдруг среди вас есть фанаты тенниса, которые тоже захотят рвануть на мастерс в Цинциннати — можно даже пересечься. На этот турнир мы уже ездили в 2024 году (фотография как раз оттуда). Cincinnati Open — последний крупный турнир перед US Open, поэтому сюда приезжают почти все топовые игроки: размяться перед Шлемом, привыкнуть…
custom 54089199009053091204❤2custom 54045465418662239202custom 54071152930864821702👍1
SCULPD. ИДЕЯ ДЛЯ ДОМАШНЕГО СВИДАНИЯ Много лет назад опытным путем выяснилось, что Саше очень нравится лепить из глины. Особенно его покорил гончарный круг. Один раз еле увела из студии. Про себя вообще молчу — в ковид всерьез рассматривала покупку гончарного круга и печи домой. P.S. Не то чтобы я умею на нем что-то делать. Если вам кажется, что это легко — очень советую сходить попробовать. 😂 Недавно в рекламе мне…
🔥10❤4custom 54071152930864821703custom 54089199009053091203😇1custom 54045465418662239201
ШАБЛОН ПРОЕКТИРОВАНИЯ API GATEWAY Давайте сегодня подумаем о чем-то большом. Откройте любой маркетплейс. Что вы там видите? ⬛корзину; ⬛профиль пользователя; ⬛каталог; ⬛персональные рекомендации; ⬛баннеры с акциями; ⬛поиск; ⬛и так далее. За каждой из этих функций стоит отдельный микросервис. А теперь смените устройство. Если открывали сайт с телефона — возьмите ноутбук. Интерфейс, скорее всего, будет отличаться. Г…
custom 54088475478862411903🤓2👨💻1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @babanyurawisdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Любите дождь?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 808,682 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Baba Нюра's Wisdom” (@babanyurawisdom), 226 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/babanyurawisdom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.