4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,338–1,340 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 03:39
1,340
+2
10 Aug 2026, 20:52
1,338
-1
7 Aug 2026, 22:22
1,339
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
1,339
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
47.2%
avg views ÷ 1,340 subscribers
Avg views / post
633
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (25 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
5,060
Reactions total
53
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
73
53.3%
🔥
44
32.1%
❤
15
10.9%
🤔
2
1.46%
🎉
1
0.73%
👎
1
0.73%
😁
1
0.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @b2x_lubricants. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Дайджест новостей рынка смазочных материалов за период с 21 июля по 6 августа 2026:
- СИБУР будет производить в Нижнекамске смазочные материалы - "Бизнес Online"
- В Калужской области локализовали производство масел для «Пежо» и «Ситроен»
- Компания CNRG Lubricants завершила очередной этап модернизации собственной лаборатории
- Альтернатива смазочным материалам Cat появилась у «Восточной Техники»
- Уфимский ГНТУ…
Про топливо Евро-3 и моторные масла
Многие участники рынка смазочных материалов уже высказали свое мнение по поводу рисков использования топлива Евро-3, мы в свою консолидировали экспертную оценку от нескольких независимых специалистов.
Для 35% парка легковых автомобилей в РФ, соответствующих Евро-3 и ниже, риски минимальные или отсутствуют. Для остальных более современных автомобилей, в основном тех, что оснащены …
Доля российских брендов на розничном рынке смазочных материалов и технических жидкостей в 1 полугодии 2026
На прошлой неделе на вебинаре обсудили как меняется доля брендов в рознице в 2026.
Во всех основных категориях зафиксирован рост доли российских брендов. Наиболее заметную положительную динамику демонстрирует сегмент жидкостей для АКПП, где доля российских брендов увеличилась сразу на 4 п.п. В категориях охлаж…
Краткий обзор розничного рынка смазочных материалов и технических жидкостей за июнь 2026
В июне 2026 года рынок продолжил показывать положительную динамику в сравнении с аналогичными периодами прошлого года.
Основные показатели:
- Рост в натуральном выражении: +1,8%
- Рост в денежном выражении: +10,6%
- Средняя цена увеличилась на +8,6%
По итогам января–июня 2026
• Наиболее устойчивую динамику демонстрируют тра…
Онлайн-канал остается драйвером роста розничного рынка СМ, но темпы прироста доли снижаются
По итогам 1 полугодия 2026 года онлайн обеспечил основной прирост рынка моторных масел B2C (+4,6% в литрах). Однако по сравнению с предыдущими годами темпы роста онлайн-канала постепенно замедляются, в 2026 доля выросла на 0,9 п.п. и составила 24,7%.
Поговорим на тему онлайн-канала и не только уже завтра на вебинаре B2X.
Ис…
Программа вебинара B2X "Обзор ключевых трендов рынка смазочных материалов в 1 полугодии 2026 года"
На предстоящем вебинаре мы подведем итоги 1 полугодия: обсудим как изменения экономики влияют на рынок смазочных материалов, сделаем прогноз рынка до конца 2026 года и детально поговорим о розничном рынке - каналы продаж, продукты, и, конечно же, цены.
11:00 - 11:20 Рынок смазочных материалов в 1 полугодии 2026. Анато…
Дайджест новостей рынка смазочных материалов за период с 1 по 20 июля 2026:
- Автомобильные масла в РФ подорожали в среднем на 15-20% - аналитика "Известий"
- Обновление национального стандарта Китая GB 11122 и вступление в силу требований для новой категории масел D1
- Ученые РФ создали масло для экономии топлива газопоршневых двигателей
- На сколько выросли цены на расходники для ремонта авто - "Коммерсантъ"
-…
📅 И в продолжение темы вебинаров - 28 июля в 11:00 МСК мы проведем ежеквартальный вебинар "Обзор ключевых трендов рынка смазочных материалов России", где подведем итоги первого полугодия.
Уже сейчас вы можете зарегистрироваться на вебинар по ссылке. На следующей неделе мы поделимся подробной программой вебинара.
Просим вас ответить на ставший уже традиционным вопрос по динамике продаж смазочных материалов. Мы проан…
⚡️Спасибо всем, кто присоединился к вебинару «Обучение продавцов СМ как инвестиция в прибыль: почему рынок больше не прощает некомпетентных переговорщиков»
Благодарим за активное участие, надеемся, что представленные кейсы и практические подходы будут полезны в вашей работе.
📩 Завтра в первой половине дня мы направим всем участникам вебинара:
- запись вебинара;
- презентацию;
- форму обратной связи.
Если у вас воз…
Уважаемые друзья, напоминаем о начале вебинара в 11:00. Подключайтесь ссылка.
👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @b2x_lubricants. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“B2X Смазочные материалы” (@b2x_lubricants), 1,340 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/b2x_lubricants.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.