🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ׂ ִ۫ ִ ᨳ࣪🍥𖦹 ۫͜ ͜𖥔 𓈒𝂅ׄ ┈🍥៸ ۫៸ ᪶ഒ𝅄ׄ🍥𝅄 🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🎅 •Подписку без дальнейшей отписки на канал @PeachTreeBanners •Репост в свой канал без стикера с доказательствами 🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🍥🍥 • Хедканоны и полная расписка того, кем бы вы были, если вы попадали бы в Цирк Талантов, где находятся люди с мутациями; способностями и т.д. Места отмечены в комментариях.(11/25) 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Брони вы

Channel
.𝗺𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶.༢
@ayto666salt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
226subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002997012342 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ayto666salt |
| Description | ᨦ ˚ . ⊹ℳ𝒊𝒓𝒐𝒓𝚒 𝒁𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙞k ˚ ഒ .° ꒰ / соль I am a dead inside,,, wwww главный аято мейнер. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ayto666salt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:30 | 226 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 226 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 52.1%
- avg views ÷ 226 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 118
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.81%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,002 |
| Reactions total | 139 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 156
- Videos
- 49
- Links
- 34
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 29s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
139 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334611271557877182 | 29 | 20.9% | |
| custom 5413559809909729503 | 22 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5417958659579740667 | 22 | 15.8% | |
| custom 5226655907068268832 | 16 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5940677310742007646 | 16 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5454253040196423465 | 12 | 8.63% | |
| custom 5348554573646686666 | 9 | 6.47% | |
| custom 5188627317441726302 | 6 | 4.32% | |
| custom 5453950537059829520 | 4 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5433713454319938373 | 3 | 2.16% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 11
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
- Most on one post
- 6
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ayto666salt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝖭𝖤𝖶 𝖵𝖨𝖣𝖤𝖮 cr : @ZIWy_port in the video : @RE1KAPORT @ayto666salt @LYNNP0RT @Liyasha_port @vividDreamHouse1 @LINCOMPANY ㅤㅤㅤ #𝖯𝖱𝖠𝖢𝖳𝖨𝖢𝖤
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54539505370598295201
🌟🌟🤩⭐️🔹ew post🎀⭐️🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 𓂃⟡ ⠀࣪ഒ ❤️䴳。 🤩🪶🪶 🌟🌟🌟🌟STICKERS 🚬 —— 💎 🔇👻🤍💕🤩🤩🤩🩶🤍❗ #стики #аниме #атакатитанов #Леви #Аккерман
custom 541355980990972950322custom 545425304019642346512custom 594067731074200764612custom 54539505370598295203
Sticker, posted without a caption
@kisserRayy мирори уже не та личность,что две удаленных авы назад
custom 59406773107420076464
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54179586595797406671
🌟🌟🤩⭐️🔹ew post🎀⭐️🤩 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 𓂃⟡ ⠀࣪ഒ 🌊䴳。 🤩🤩🤩 🌟🌟🌟🌟STICKERS 🚬 —— для тгк. @Tartagliakisserrrr 🔇👻👻🤍💕🤩🤩🤩🩶🤍❗ #стики #геншин #тарталья #лоэн
custom 522665590706826883216custom 53346112715578771827custom 54179586595797406675custom 51886273174417263021
Sticker, posted without a caption
крутой тгк про мирори и емусю ок да.@Tartagliakisserrrr подписон можно.
custom 53485545736466866665custom 54337134543199383733custom 54179586595797406672
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ayto666salt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
кто я из алнст?
- иван🌟63%
- тилл🌟28%
- суа 🌟17%
- мизи 🌟13%
- хёна🥥15%
- лука 🥥35%
The shares total 171%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 402,339 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@PortTaylor · 302 postsКАРМА || ГР
@BOKMAXYELU · 2801 postЗакрыт ︵°𝐸𝑖𝑣𝑎 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘~ᕗ
@eiva_work · 231 postInfo ᤳ ⃙𖦹𝂅ׄ Dragons Quill𓆪᪾𓆪 ִ۫ 𝅄
@gtak66 · 121 post(!!) 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼 #
@InfoVezalyDes · 151 post𝑵𝒂𝒗𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏
@Kikoportnavig · 101 post†꤬۫◝ ﹫ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓.. 𝕽۫𝐈𝐍 ╪ #𝐌𝐊𝐌
@P0RTF1LI0Rin · 651 post[ 𝘶𝘻𝘶𝘳𝘢𝘮𝘦 ] 𝖱𝖤𝖲𝖳.
@portuzurame · 691 post• 𝕽𝐄𝐈𝐊𝐀 ┊ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓’, ㅤ۟ ㅤ ۫ㅤ ུ,
@RE1KAPORT · 601 post⋆ ˚。⋆୨ ʚ rι᥎ιᥲᥣᥣ𐔖 ρ𐔖rt ɞ ⋆ ˚。⋆
@Rivialloport · 761 post(закрыто-переезд??)#.𝗦𝗘𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗛 ⃗ ᵖᵒʳᵗ
@seraphPort02 · 1461 post,𝐦𝒊𝒓𝒐𝓻𝓲˚⋆໒꒱
@Tartagliakisserrrr · 61 post:💞:☨ꪀ𝐍⨍𝐨_zׁׁׅׅ֬֬𝐈ᨰׁׅ.
@ZiwY_portinf · 51 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Tartagliakisserrrr · 62 postsLINVILLE COMPANY ( 89 )
@LINCOMPANY · 4001 post”[Рест] 𝗦𝗇𝗈𝗐𝗒 𝗠𝗈𝗈𝗇🎮 “
@Liyasha_port · 1981 postㅤ᷼ৎั𑪍᮫᠀݃ 𝐥ყ⃪ᩘ𐓣ᥒ ֵ ⃑ թ𑄝⃪᜔ࣰ𝒓𝐭𑣩ׅ֩፝ ◞ࣲ︠︡᷼꒱ꨲ֔◝𝃡
@LYNNP0RT · 2381 post‧₊˚𝑷𝒆𝒂𝒄𝒉 𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒆‿◞ ྀི
@Peachtreebanners · 2461 post• 𝕽𝐄𝐈𝐊𝐀 ┊ 𝕻𝐎𝐑𝐓’, ㅤ۟ ㅤ ۫ㅤ ུ,
@RE1KAPORT · 601 post𝑉𝐼𝑉𝐼𝐷 𝐷𝑅𝐸𝐴𝑀 𝐻𝑂𝑈𝑆𝐸ᵈᵏᵐ
@vividDreamHouse1 · 3221 post𝖱𝖤𝖲𝖳 ⋆𝒵𝗜𝗪`𝘆💎𓂃#sʜᴅ°
@ZIWy_port · 2971 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.𝗺𝗶𝗿𝗼𝗿𝗶.༢” (@ayto666salt), 226 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayto666salt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.