📋 有一份关于你的验证报告,请确认是否属实: 【妹子花名】:阿依娜尔 【妹子账号】:@aynr123 【验证留名】:请说中国话Dute 【验证时间】:10.23 【所在位置】:张家寺 【修车水费】:8p 【是否代聊】:是 【身高身材】:162 44 S 【妹子年龄】:22 【湿度紧度】:紧湿 【颜值相似】:9 【凶器罩杯】:d 【环境卫生】:整洁 【服务内容】:B面+三件套 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:大熊读音 【 性 价 比 】:9X.X分/ /满分10.0分 【推荐程度】:8.5X.X分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:好久没Cj了,在医生频道看了半天,正好又在附近,于是决定探上一探各位兄弟的异域风情,公寓酒店,干净整洁,门禁自己刷,开门之后我转身,映入眼帘的脸与照片相差无异,“哥哥好…

Channel
阿依娜尔的频道
@aynr223
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
201subscribers
+76 since we began measuring on 23 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003785950032 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aynr223 |
| Created | 19 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 23 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aynr223 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 201 | +71 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:34 | 130 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:22 | 125 | first reading |
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 19 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 194.7%
- avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 391
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.357%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (19 October 2026 – 23 October 2026) |
| Views total | 3,130 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 5s
- Average length
- 5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2026 to 23 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【妹子花名】:#阿依娜尔 【妹子账号】:@aynr123 【验证留名】:Kevin 【验证时间】:10-21 【所在位置】:张家寺 【修车水费】:8P 【是否代聊】:本人聊 【身高身材】:162 【妹子年龄】:22 【湿度紧度】:湿紧 【颜值相似】:9 【凶器罩杯】:c 【环境卫生】:整洁干净 【服务内容】:菜单都有 【机车行为】:态度好 【优点缺点】:颜值高,态度好 【 性 价 比 】:9分/ /满分10.0分 【推荐程度】:9分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:进屋见面就懵了,老师用那种看着猎物的眼神盯着我,从长相到穿搭点评了一顿,然后拉着我的手直奔卧室,好像要把我吃了…… 洗澡过后,我坐在床边,她要跪着给我口,说自己是 m,边口边用眼神勾引我 之后细节就不说了 结束之后又躺在床上聊了…
Posted without readable text
【成都大话修车认证】 花名: #阿依娜尔 车牌: @aynr123 车费: 8p 15pp 位置: 张家寺地铁站 标签: #双流区 #自聊 #御姐 #良家感 #态度车 #服务车 #网红脸 #身材车 #8P 注: 人照9分,身高体重165/90,老师是新疆人,五官轮廓立体,身材娇小,属于网红脸的御姐。皮肤光滑,腿上有点纹身,胸有C的样子,微科技。下面户型蝴蝶毛量少全程水都很多比较紧。服务有ab面,老师会一些简单的按摩,三件套+胸推+臀推,整体很主动,态度很好,说话也比较温柔,情绪价值高,女友感很强,可惜的是没有蛇纹。 优惠情况:出击分兑换白嫖 主群: @CDdahuaxiuche 备用群: @CDdlamxw
❤1
📋 有一份关于你的验证报告,请确认是否属实: 【妹子花名】:阿依娜尔 【妹子账号】:@aynr123 【验证留名】:杠上花 【验证时间】:10.21 【所在位置】:张家寺 【修车水费】:8p 【是否代聊】:自聊 【身高身材】:162左右 【妹子年龄】: 22左右 【湿度紧度】: 湿紧 【颜值相似】:9 【凶器罩杯】:c 【环境卫生】:干净整洁 【服务内容】:菜单都有 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:颜值在线,温柔 【性价比】: 9分/满分10分 【推荐程度】:9分/满分10分 【个人发挥】 久未出击,有点憋了,赶紧找个新老师头课安排起,体会哈异域风情。 硬件方面,教室比较安全,非传统炮楼。真人颜值在线,和视频有一定相似度,五官更有轮廓一些,👁大而漂亮,鼻子有调,整体参考网红风脸和妆造。身材纤细,接近细枝硕果,正常肤色肤质,🐻c左右,个人觉得科技感不算明显,软软的。小穴户型毛量正常,…
起床搬砖啦
成都开课
艺名 阿依娜尔(兼职) 年龄 19 身高 163cm 胸围 D 体重 44KG 个人特点:🍓乖巧懂事、🍒温柔可人、🍑妩媚动人。🌽皮肤白皙、🌶身材火辣。 💖服务内容∶鸳鸯浴、无套口、旋转吹箫、69、全身漫游、波推、深喉、舔蛋、激情啪啪等。其他服务无过分要求可以配合❤️ ❤️费用∶800/课,45分钟 1500/2课,90分钟 pp:中途不退费🍒 超过15分钟手打 ⚠️宝子们记得使用现金支付 嗨、鸽子绕道。看清再联系❤️其他服务无过分要求可以配合🥰 🈲:砍价 🈲:嗑药、醉酒、无🍑 🈲:偷拍、扣妹、🐍吻 🈲:后花园、没素质不接
❤2💩1
Channel created
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @aynr223. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“阿依娜尔的频道” (@aynr223), 201 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aynr223.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.