❤️ GIVEAWAY SPESIAL AGUSTUS BY @AYESPREMS. ❤️ HADIAH NYA ADALAH JUARA 1 : TELEGRAM PREMIUM 1 BUlAN GRATIS. JUARA 2 : STARS 75 JUARA 3 : SALDO 15.000 JUARA 4 : CAPCUT SHAR 1 BULAN JUARA 5 : NETFLIX 7 HARI. 📸Cara ikutan dan rules. 📸List nominal point yg di dapat.

Channel
archive @premium ‘s
@ayesprems
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
23subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002973538848 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @ayesprems @glenchyprems |
| Description | Handle by :: @kecupe ᡣ𐭩 Archive ress :: @ayesprems ᡣ𐭩 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 18 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ayesprems |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:00 | 23 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 20 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 20 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 18 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 121.7%
- avg views ÷ 23 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 28.0
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (18 October 2025 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 9.09%
- 2 of 22 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 2
- posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 579
- over 2 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 867
- over 20 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20260607101214351515010300166572382386331 | 1 | 6 June 2026 | 6 June 2026 |
| 20260624101214353315010300166572385196215 | 1 | 24 June 2026 | 24 June 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2025 to 18 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
GIVEAWAY BY @AYESPREMS SPESIAL AGUSTUS DI MULAI PADA TANGGAL 18 AGUSTUS SISTEM NYA 1. CUKUP JOIN GRUP DAN KUMPULKAN 🍒 SEBANYAK MUNGKIN 2. POIN AKAN DIHITUNG DARI SETIAP PEMBELIAN. 3. SEMUA TRANSAKSI DILAKUKAN DI GRUP APABILA 4. PEMENANG AKAN DIUMUMKAN TANGGAL 20 SEPTEMBER 5. YANG PALING BANYAK AKAN MENDAPATKAN TELEGRAM PREMIUM SECARA GRATIS. ❤️ SISTEM POIN PEMBELIAN 100P - 5.000 = 1 🍒 6.000 - 11.000 =2 🍒 12.…
https://t.me/+5XzDm8ZK-8I5YmJk kesinii kuyy !!
SYE SYEE SPIL DONK APK PREM YG MURAH DIMANA??? MAU BANGET DI BISIKIN RESELLER RASA FIRST HAND? SINI JOIN !! 🔥🔥 COCOK BUAT DI RESEL WOIIK » NETFLIX NO STRONG 1U1D : 1.200 1U1B : 10.000 2U1D : 1.000 2U1B : 8.500 » YOUTUBE FAMP 1B : 1.000 JASPAY INDPLAN : 1.000 » LOKLOK SHARING STD : 15.000 SHARING BASIC : 12.500 NETFLIX STRONG ACCOUNT ONLY LOG CODE » 1u1p 1 day : 1.800 » 1u1p 3 day : 5.000 » 1u1p 1 week : 8.…
RESELLER APK PREMIUM TERMURAH VIU ANLIM 1B 50P CANVA 1B 500P CAPCUT 1B 16K AM PRIVATE 1Y 800P TELEPREM 53K YOUTUBE FAMPLAN 800P CAPCUT 7d shar: 8k 7d priv: 11k 1b shar : 13k 1b private : 15k 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗠𝗢 𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗫 𝗡𝗢 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗚 > 𝗻𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 (𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸/𝗲𝗺𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘀) 1 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 1 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 900𝗉 1 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 3 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 3.000 1 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 7 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 5.700 1 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 1 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗁 :: 10.000 2 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 1 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 500𝗉 2 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 3 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 2.000 2 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 7 𝖽𝖺𝗒 :: 5.500 2 𝗎𝗌𝖾𝗋 1 𝗆𝗈𝗇𝗍𝗁 :: 8.…
Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=s9rb9t9rw&r=gXOXNh&orderId=20260624101214353315010300166572385196215 dagett buat kaliann makasii sudaa jajann ⭐⭐
😍2
𝚢𝚒𝚙𝚙𝚒𝚎𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚢 𝟻𝟶𝟶 𝚛𝚗𝚔 𝚐𝚕𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚑𝚢 ⭐⭐
💘1
𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗫 𝗡𝗢 𝗦𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗡𝗚 🌷 ౨ৎ Netflix sharing 1 pengguna 1 user ╰┈➤ 1 day : 1.200 ╰┈➤ 2 day : 2.000 ╰┈➤ 3 day : 3.300 ╰┈➤ 1 week : 6.000 ╰┈➤ 1 month : 10.000 ────────── · · ౨ৎ Netflix sharing 1 pengguna 2 user ╰┈➤ 1 day : 500p ╰┈➤ 2 day : 2.000 ╰┈➤ 3 day : 3.000 ╰┈➤ 1 week : 5.500 ╰┈➤ 1 month : 8.500 ────────── · · ౨ৎ Netflix Semi Private ❗ ╰┈➤ 1 Day : 2.000 ╰┈➤ 3 Day : 5.000 ╰┈➤ 7 week : 9.000 ╰┈➤ 1 month : 17.000 𝗡𝗘𝗧𝗙𝗟𝗜𝗫…
❤2
Aku lagi sebar DANA Kaget nih! Yuk, sikat segera sebelum melayang 💸💸💸 https://link.dana.id/danakaget?c=smvlmzmct&r=gXOXNh&orderId=20260607101214351515010300166572382386331 rajinn rajinn yaa jajannya 😊😊
SEND PROOF LOGIN MAX 1×24 JAM Nama apk : Tgl order : ‼️(untuk garansian)‼️ send di komen jangan ke rc!
ㅤㅤㅤ✍️ RUMUS REFFUND ✍️ harga beli ÷ durasi × sisa durasi × service fee = harga reffund Contoh : 20.000 ÷ 30 × 15 × 0.7 = 7.000 📌 ketentuan service fee : 0.8 = pemakaian kurang dari 1 minggu 0.7 = belum pernah claim garansi tapi udah lebih dari seminggu 0.6 = sudah pernah claim garansi 1-2× 0.5 = sudah pernah claim garansi 3× 0.4 = sudah pernah claim garansi lebih dari 3×
ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 👍 ⸼ REGULATION ⸼ 👍 ✦ Harap tanyakan stok terlebih dahulu sebelum order dan cek Pl yang berlaku. Jika masih bingung, silakan tanya admin. ✦ Gunakan Format order yang benar dan lengkap agar pesanan dapat segera diproses. ✦ Mohon cek username admin dengan teliti sebelum melakukan transaksi. Jika terjadi penipuan di luar username resmi, hal tersebut bukan tanggung jawab kami. ✦ Pembayaran dilakukan di awal untu…
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @ayesprems. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,200,973 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ayesprems named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“archive @premium ‘s” (@ayesprems), 23 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ayesprems.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.