5 measurements spanning 9 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,089–1,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 17:17
1,091
-5
12 Aug 2026, 05:12
1,096
-4
9 Aug 2026, 15:13
1,100
-6
6 Aug 2026, 12:17
1,106
no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:11
1,106
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
81 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
48
59.3%
👍
28
34.6%
😍
3
3.70%
💔
2
2.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
یه سال گذشت با همه خوبیها و بدی هاش، با همه سختی هاش،
اذیت هاش، اما گذشت…
شب تولدم برام یادآوره اینه که
جز لحظه ها هیچ چیزی اونقدر اهمیت نداره که بخاطرش بیش از حد نگران باشم.
چون جز لحظه هام هم رو هیچ نقطه ای از این موتور زمان که بی توقف جلو میره، نه تسلط دارم نه دسترسی…!
فقط میتونم خودمو تو لحظه هایی که هستم،
بهتر از قبل بسازم.
و همین واقعیت منه :)
دوستت دارم من✨
#آیدا_نویس
تقریبا کمتر کسی میدونه تو چه برزخی دارم میگذرونم لحظه هام رو؛
در مرحله ای از زندگیم هستم که
حس میکنم از همه جهات تو فشار، تنگنا،
و بدو بدو ام.
در این نقطه، گویا جهان داره در تمامی ابعاد
صبر، اراده و تلاشم رو امتحان میکنه...
و برزخ معناش چیزی نیست جز «انتظار برای رفع بلاتکلیفی»!
بی وقفه در حال تلاشم که از این
بلاتکلیفی رها شم،
و تمام اراده م رو به کار بستم که این انتظار، نتیجه قابل قبولی برام داشته باشه.
حقیقتا نمید…
یکی از معیارهای دقیق تشخیص عمق و امنیت یه رابطه اینه که چقدر میتونن بیپرده در مورد خودشون، موضوعات مختلف و اون رابطه حرف بزنن✨
در غیر این صورت ممکنه رابطه امن باشه ولی اصلا عمقی شکل نمیگیره
بچه ها رابطه ساختنیه، آرزو کردنی نیست. شما باید یک ارتباطی که شکل میدید رو بسازید و ازش مراقبت کنید و باهاش منعطف باشید و بابتش زمان ، انرژی و احساس هزینه کنید و خیلی مهارتهای دیگه. حرفم شامل هر نوع ارتباطی میشه (دوست،همکار،فرزند...)و…
یه فیلمی که تا حالا ندیدید رو بردارید و ده ثانیهای از وسطش رو ببینید.
تصورتون رو راجع به اون سکانس و آدمهای توش نگه دارید.
بعد فیلم رو از اول ببینید؛ وقتی رسیدید به همون سکانس، میبینید چقدر تصوراتتون غلط بوده.
تو زندگی هم همینطوره؛
رو یه نگاه سریع قضاوت نکنید،
آدمها رو از ریشه بشناسید ✨
اگه دنیا اذیتت کرد پاشو یهکار مهربون برای خودت انجام بده.
❤3
Signed ماهیدا🌙🦋
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @aydamatnkade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
چیه اسمش ؟ @chiehesmesh · 347,954 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ماهیدا🌙” (@aydamatnkade), 1,091 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aydamatnkade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.