Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AY | CRYPTO

@ay_cry

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,249subscribers

-63 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001886949161
TypeChannel
Username@ay_cry
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ay_cry

Growth

10,24410,31210,2787 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,312 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,284 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,274 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,269 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,264 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,245 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,249 subscribers10,2497 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -63. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,234–10,322 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 13:2810,249+5
12 Aug 2026, 14:3410,244-1
11 Aug 2026, 17:0210,245-19
10 Aug 2026, 17:4810,264-5
9 Aug 2026, 18:4110,269-5
8 Aug 2026, 19:5810,274-10
7 Aug 2026, 23:2610,284-28
7 Aug 2026, 08:3010,312no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:2210,312first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 28 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 10,249 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,150
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.874%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held21 (28 June 20268 August 2026)
Views total21,500
Reactions total188
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

418 reactions across 21 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡14634.9%
👍11226.8%
😁11026.3%
378.85%
133.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 418reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 21 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ay_cry. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,820 views31 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

StripChain сейл подъехал Надеюсь все забрали WL, потому что сейл StripChain уже стартовал Слава богу никакие условия не меняли, поэтому всё так-же имеем 100% разлока токенов на TGE. Дошли уже до 5 стейджа из 30 и цена поднялась до $0.0716, это всё ещё не дорого, поэтому можно залетать (чем быстрее, тем лучше) 🟢Принять участие можно на сайте (закидываем от 250$ до 10к$ в ETH) Напомню, что тут сейл работает по сист

🫡14😁98

5 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,960 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Забираем Gemini Pro на 1.5 года за 0,2/$месяц! Это топ ИИ за дешево с широким функционалом и норм запросами, топ по цене/качество! Можно взять себе за 0.2$ в месяц сейчас, рассказываю как и где Подписка дает: ➡Gemini AI Pro — чат, код, анализ, генерация изображений ➡Nano Banana 2 PRO — генерация изображений ➡Google Flow / VEO генерация — AI-видео ➡Deep Research — исследования по запросу ➡NotebookLM Plus — расширенн

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,990 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Апдейты по StripChain - Забираем WL на паблик сейл Недавно воркалим Testnet от StripChain, а сейчас они открыли доступ к WL на паблик сейла своего токена STRIP Главная в том, что StripChain решили отказаться от стандартных токенсейлов (те самые ситуации когда все сразу стаканится после листинга). Они придумали свой формат - ITTC, в котором установлен минимальный порог цены токена (чтобы не прошел сильный дамп после

🫡2😁21

3 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈1,950 views42 reactions11 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Все полезные и актуальные сервисы для ворка 🟢База • Тайник Store (самый дешёвый магазин с нейронками, есть гарантия и оплата криптой + СБП) • WorkHub (cервис, по поиску работы или работников, любая интернет ниша, не только крипта) • Prostoexbot (сервис для вывода USDT в фиат. Быстрый, стабильный, легальный) • ProstoVPN (ВПН, который на изи обходит все белые списки. Бесплатно можно юзать 3 дня и ещё 4 дня по промо vp

🫡19👍13😁82

2 Aug 2026, 09:14 UTC≈2,050 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Кароче тут смарт покупать подписки на ИИ Взял себе Gemini Pro 18 месяцев за базовый минимум в 299Р, цены прям ниже плинтуса и все работает четко. Кто искал где взять акк Клода, ГПТ и так далее - юзайте, промо FREE20 на 20 руб на балик. @taynikstore_bot

😁52

31 Jul 2026, 17:08 UTC≈2,260 views21 reactions2 Starsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А вот и для лоубанков подгон. Лёгкие 1-10$ в день @WorkHubApp_bot Я уже говорил, что потиху вайбкожу в воркхабе. А сейчас они дропнули гемный апдейт с быстрыми тасками. Стоят условно по 0.1$, но выполняются за пол минуты. Крч посидел на толчке и вынес бакс - другой Ну и если надо найти работника в свой проект, то тут полно вакансий, заходите и выбирайте AY|Crypto:✈Telegram|▶Youtube

👍11🫡7😁3

29 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC≈2,250 views27 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Base и кринжовая защита от сибилов Буквально недавно Base анонсировали запуск своей системы Base Verify Доблестные ребята из бейз, решили что главная проблема дропов это работяга, который создал 200 акков и залутал себе весь саплай. И они с этим будут бороться Поэтому они вводят новую систему: 🟢Пользователю нужно будет подтвердить свой аккаунт через Coinbase с Coinbase ONE, Twitter и прочей лабудой 🟢Система создас

🫡12👍761😁1

25 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈2,340 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Фармим тестнет под потенциально жирный дроп от StripChain StripChain - хотят создать Unified Computer, который будет соединять кошельки и ликвидность огромного количества сетей в одном интерфейсе, крч мультичейн трезвого человека По сборам всё неплохо: 10M$ от Sora Ventures, Shima Capital и кучи других фондов, а ещё есть суппорт от Silent Research Labs Из интересного - выделено 50% саплая их будущего токена STRIP

🫡8👍4😁31

21 Jul 2026, 16:31 UTC≈2,390 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Забираем дроп щитка за активность в Robinhood Если вы ранний юзер Robinhood, то сейчас можно забрать дропчик щитка $RPAD. Элигбл те, кто успел влететь в первый миллион транзакций на робингуде 🟢Переходим на сайт и проверяемся Eligible можно проверить без подключения кошелька, просто вводите адрес. Ну что урвал кто-нибудь? AY|Crypto: ✈Telegram| ▶Youtube

👍6😁32

17 Jul 2026, 15:32 UTC≈2,490 views24 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Продолжаем фармить OKX Boost. Новый ивент Я начал в последнее время опять воркать OKX Boost. Часто стало возможным залететь в ивент заранее (инфу о снепе дают за день заранее) Сейчас можно зайти в новый ивентик. Раздают 1М токенов ARX. Рега заканчивается через 18 часов, а по условиям надо было набить 600$ среднего объёма (за 10 дней) и 200$ холда балика 🟢Регаемся на OKX Boost 🟢Если активничали, то регаемся в ARX б

👍10🫡9😁5

13 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC≈2,670 views21 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Forte (910М$) - наконец-то тестнет для простого народа Про Forte я сделал 4 поста (вот крайний). Мы подавались на WL и у них запускался тестнет, но только в первую фазу многих все равно не пустили Так вот с 15 июля у них стартует второй сезон и на этот раз доступ выдадут уже всем тем, кто подавался на WL 🟢Воркать будем на этом сайте Напоминаю, у проекта 910М$ сборов, поэтому лучше прогоните все свои акки с влами

🫡11👍6😁31

11 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC≈2,440 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Вышло уже 170$ с заказов за 4 дня, крипта не кормит а workhub кормит @WorkHubApp_bot Беру заказы, прямо в телеге в мини-апке и за пару часов получается иногда отворкать монтаж или задачу по нейронке какую. Делаю через Claude + Codex

😁83🫡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ay_cry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 565,149 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AY | CRYPTO” (@ay_cry), 10,249 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ay_cry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.