Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘬𝘬𝘪𝘺𝘢

Channel

𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘬𝘬𝘪𝘺𝘢

@awtaekookagain

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

680subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003936178320
TypeChannel
Username@awtaekookagain
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/awtaekookagain

Growth

671680675.514 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 671 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 05:38 — 680 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:1815 Aug 2026, 05:38
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 670–681 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:38680+9
14 Aug 2026, 07:18671first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.0%
avg views ÷ 680 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
28.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held16 (14 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total2,283
Reactions total646
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

646 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭62596.7%
💘213.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 646reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC141 views42 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

این فیسیه که جونگ‌کوک داره وقتی تهیونگ جلوی پاش می‌شینه و دکمه‌اش رو باز می‌کنه.

😭38💘4

14 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC133 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026

با این عکس جونگکوک فقط دراکولا تو ذهنم رفت و آمد کرد

😭29

14 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC132 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026

هر کی موافقه ترسناک‌ترین تتوش جاییه که ما نمی‌بینیم گریه کنه

😭44💘2

14 Aug 2026, 05:55 UTC136 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026

یعنی چی که گوشش جرأت کرده ۳۰ درصد بشنوه؟ احمق به خودت بیا

😭38💘2

14 Aug 2026, 05:54 UTC137 views40 reactionsread 14 August 2026

آخه جونگ‌کوک خواننده‌ست به گوشش نیاز داره؛ ولی من نیاز ندارم

😭38💘2

14 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC136 views34 reactionsread 14 August 2026

https://t.me/awtaekookagain/2293 از دست تو و جئون خسته‌م

😭34

14 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC139 views46 reactionsread 14 August 2026

هنوز این مورد که عشق زندگیم آسیب دیده و نمی‌تونم گوشم رو بهش بدم هضم نکردم

😭44💘2

14 Aug 2026, 05:52 UTC143 views42 reactionsread 14 August 2026

خواستم بگم جونگکوک اونیکی ایرپاد رو برداشته تا تهیونگ گوشش اذیت نشه:))

😭40💘2

14 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC150 views37 reactionsread 14 August 2026

مثل تهیونگ باشید؛ وقتی آلفا به خوبی جونگ‌کوک پیدا کردید پززززززز بدید

😭36💘1

14 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC143 views37 reactionsread 14 August 2026

چون اومده پسرشو همراهی کنه👍

😭37

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @awtaekookagain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 583,359 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝘴𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘢𝘭 𝘴𝘦𝘬𝘬𝘪𝘺𝘢” (@awtaekookagain), 680 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awtaekookagain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.