#群友反馈:西港OB希尔顿别墅区附近 警察封锁了一个路口 里面有2栋联排被围了。

Channel
安危大事件 @AWDSJ
@awdsj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27,178subscribers
-81 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003650497052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @awdsj |
| Description | 📣 安危大事件 | 全球安危·风险快报 🗞 聚焦全球重大安全、危机与风险动态 🔎 深度解析大事件背后逻辑与影响 🛡 提供防骗、防恐、求助、安全与出行风险提示 ⚠️ 关注全球安全风险 · 理性判断信息 📌 所有内容来源于公开资料与用户提供,仅作风险提示参考,不构成官方建议,请以警方或权威渠道发布为准。 📝 商务合作请联系:@DaZhuBian |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/awdsj |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 27,178 | -28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 27,206 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 27,209 | -30 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 27,239 | -10 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 27,249 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 27,257 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 27,259 | first reading |
Engagement
90 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.02%
- avg views ÷ 27,178 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.3
- 90 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 90
- of 90 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 90 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 479 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 11:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈5,050
- Videos
- ≈1,530
- Links
- ≈14
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 14m 57s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
干拉省重新查封11处涉嫌网赌电诈可疑窝点 今天,干拉省副省长黑索莫卡拉率联合工作组,对此前查封的11处涉嫌网赌电诈的场所进行例行复查与重新加贴封条。 经实地搜查,该11处大楼内未发现任何异常变动或偷摸复工的非法迹象,此前封条脱落系风雨侵蚀所致。联合工作组核查无误后制作笔录,并对所有场所实施二次封封,以严防非法活动卷土重来。
近日,美国驻华使领馆官方账号发布信息称,美国国务院更新中国旅行安全相关提示,提醒在华人员关注所谓“限制出境与拘留”风险。 信息中提到,中国政府可能通过限制个人出境措施,影响部分人员离境。美方列举的相关情况包括: 一、要求个人配合中国政府相关调查; 二、对海外家庭成员施加压力,促使其返回中国; 三、在民事纠纷过程中,对相关中国公民采取限制措施; 四、获取与外国政府谈判相关的信息。 美国国务院建议在华人员提高风险意识,了解当地法律环境,并关注自身出行安全。 该提醒引发外界关注。近年来,随着国际人员往来增加,各国政府也持续发布针对海外旅行、法律风险和人员安全的相关提示。
#缅甸资讯:木姐由于频繁收税和频繁抓诈骗,许多诈骗窝点已从木姐迁移至105码地区。 据知情人士透露,在缅甸军方的压力下,位于边境城镇木姐镇的许多诈骗公司频繁遭到缅甸军方的逮捕。这些诈骗公司于8月11日迁至105英里外的木姐镇莫当村,此前已有许多网络诈骗迁至此处。 因为缅甸军方频繁给诈骗园区压力,导致大部分诈骗公司,迁移至木姐105码,目前的诈骗公司由三个民族武装组织共同控制:掸邦进步党(SSPP)、克钦独立军(KIA)和缅甸民族民主同盟军。目前尚不清楚哪些团体在领导和管理这些诈骗公司。 此外,一些由中国人经营的诈骗公司也设在105英里村的宾馆和酒店里,并由武装部队提供安保。最近,由于来自中国的压力,军方和民团频繁突袭并逮捕木姐镇的诈骗公司。
#柬埔寨资讯:金边开展网络诈骗场所联合检查 未发现异常情况 今日,在水净华区区长林索菲亚(Lim Sophea)的带领下,水净华区行政当局组织相关部门开展联合检查行动。 此次行动重点针对位于水净华分区第2村的Infinity28公寓内一处被举报涉嫌从事网络诈骗活动的场所进行核查,旨在加强辖区安全管理,维护公共秩序和社会治安稳定。 检查过程中,执法人员对现场进行了全面排查,并对相关区域及设施进行了核实。经检查确认,现场未发现任何可疑物品,也未发现涉嫌网络诈骗或其他违法活动的迹象。
#网友投稿:这段感情一开始其实很普通。 刚认识她的时候,她只是偶尔让我给她买一杯咖啡,几十块钱而已。我觉得一个女生跟自己喜欢的人撒个娇、让买杯咖啡也没什么,所以基本都会满足她。 可后来我慢慢发现,只要有一次我不愿意给她买,她马上就会变脸,脾气特别大,甚至会说我小气、不在乎她。我当时并没有往坏处想,反而觉得可能是她缺乏安全感。 后来她跟我说,既然我这么喜欢她,那就正式做她男朋友。我也确实对她有感情,于是就答应了。 从那以后,我觉得自己既然是她男朋友,就应该宠着她,所以她提出的一些要求,我也尽量满足。可是事情就是从这里开始,一步一步变了。 最开始是一杯咖啡,后来变成了让我给她买一个榴莲,再后来又是衣服、鞋子、化妆品,各种东西越来越多。而且每一次她都会告诉我:“就这一次。” 我也一次次告诉自己,谈恋爱为女朋友花点钱很正常。可是后来这些东西渐渐从“偶尔需要”变成了“理所当然”。 甚至只要我有一次不给,她就开始发脾气、冷落我…
#国内资讯 小学生玩游戏遭“免费皮肤”诈骗,竟被骗转账36万元 近日,青州公安通报一起针对未成年人的网络诈骗案件。一名小学生独自在家使用父亲手机玩《蛋仔派对》时,被“免费领取游戏皮肤”的虚假信息诱骗。 诈骗分子以赠送游戏皮肤为幌子,引导孩子一步步操作并进行转账,最终被骗36万元。 警方提醒:家长应加强未成年人网络安全教育,切勿轻信“免费皮肤”“免费道具”等诱导信息,更不要向陌生账户转账。
西港一女子暴亡,疑似凶杀案 据本地媒体报道,昨晚,西港3分区一处大楼内发生一起命案。一名女子被发现死于卧室床上,浑身是血且眼球突出,具体死因尚不可知。 目前,警方已经介入调查。
#巴基斯坦伊斯兰堡GulbergGreens案件最新进展 目前登记了114名狗推 目前共有约254名相关人员被当地警察纳入调查,其中114人已经登记FIR,另外140人目前尚未登记FIR,正在接受进一步调查。 据悉,后续可能面临遣返等措施,涉及中国籍人员的情况,也可能通过相关执法及外交渠道与中国公安部进行沟通。
#网友反馈:🇰🇭西港海悦刚刚也被宪兵队照顾了,现在已经进去检查了
#补充视频:老挝万象雅典饭店被突袭,这次里面的推推在劫难逃了,直接全部围起来了。
#突发事件:老挝万象雅典公寓被围了,直接来了2卡车宪兵队。 这波最少要抓几十个狗推~~
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @awdsj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 828,953 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“安危大事件 @AWDSJ” (@awdsj), 27,178 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/awdsj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.