Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

avrugs

@avrugs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

-2,215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001691606433
TypeChannel
Username@avrugs
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avrugs

Growth

12,2161,108.57 Aug 2026, 09:04 — 2,216 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:16 — 2,216 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:04 — 1 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 09:048 Aug 2026, 06:04
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2,215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:041-2,215
7 Aug 2026, 09:162,216no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:042,216first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7423.8%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
74.2
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,559
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC32 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$SUMMER just launched on BSC 🔥 Narrative: The "summer shirt" meme tied to CZ. Called the "second leather jacket" after Jacket narrative. CZ & He Yi reposted. Strong CN KOL support, playing the stock-coin meta on Flap. MC ~$1.27M. From $200K to $1.27M fast. Heavy FOMO from Chinese community. CA: 0xeeb3d73d4dd44e6e4d957d89492f05d5ccee7777 GMGN · Dex · ⚡ BasedBot · 𝕏 NFA, strong CN narrative but degen as always.

6 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC52 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$Baby CashCat just launched on BSC 🐱💰 Narrative: Cute cat holding a money bag meme. Pure low-cap degen play. Community calling it early, some CN degens pushing it as the next small runner. MC ~$43K. Very early, low liquidity. High risk microcap. CA: 0xdf7f7831650474acaf3ae8fa36a4348d3dc46666 GMGN · Dex · ⚡ BasedBot · 𝕏 NFA, tiny cap degen gamble.

6 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC53 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$WinkCZ just launched on BSC 👀 Narrative: From Binance's official 36-hour marathon video to 3B users + RWA push. The "wink" (blinking eye) logo became the meme. Pure CZ/Binance narrative play. MC ~$180K. Smart money #Kagami bought early. Still very early, low cap, CN community starting to notice. CA: 0x51bbefb91afca2214c49fa152e8377dc3fa97777 GMGN · Dex · ⚡ BasedBot · 𝕏 NFA, classic early CZ narrative degen.

5 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$来根华子 (Lai Gen Hua Zi) just launched on BSC 🔥 Narrative: Chinese meme playing on "come smoke a Hua Zi" cigarette + Elon x Huang (Nvidia) vibes. Tied to the current Robinhood/Chinese stock meme wave on Flap. CT pushing hard, some calling it the best in the series. MC ~$376K. Early, still low cap, Chinese community in full FOMO mode. CA: 0x3a7154408ff75e36eb9dc198c02844f0ade27777 GMGN · Dex · ⚡ BasedBot · 𝕏 NFA, c

1

5 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

$Martian just launched on BSC 🚀 Narrative: Martian spin-off of MarsCoin. "Martian holds Martian coin" — paired with SPCXB liquidity. Stock-meme wave on Flap, some early calls hitting 4-5x. CN/EN community comparing to other similar CAs, picking this one for better pool. MC ~$233K. Liquidity ~$46K. Volume heating up. High risk degen play in the Mars narrative family. CA: 0x5e1ece3ac5c27a2c6d77cb621c06c4f1ccdf7777

1

4 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC65 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$小股东 (Small Shareholder) is pumping on BSC 🔥 Narrative: Pure CZ/Binance stock meme. "Everyone is a small shareholder" — turning Binance meme into US stock play. Community is tagging CZ hard, hoping for a reply. Tied to the broader 币股 (coin-stock) wave with other Flap plays. MC ~$1.26M. Started from ~$94K, ran hard, now consolidating. Strong CN calls, but still early in the narrative cycle. CA: 0x276c86cea6c0e200ca

3 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC77 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$MACROHARD just launched on BSC 🚀 Narrative: Microsoft parody meme ("Macrohard"). Flap opened MSFTb pair on BNB, community jumping on the stock-meme wave. Some early calls at ~$300K MC. MC ~$516K. High risk play — heavy accusations on X of team controlling wallets, fake volume, farming then dumping. CA: 0x382ed5d92502b4bc6805e3ce236dfab1f59f7777 GMGN · Dex · ⚡ BasedBot · 𝕏 NFA, extreme risk — classic potential f

1

3 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC86 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

1m5>> 22m 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 0xe9337dde3dd9e97f1f45a56412767ce5098e7777

3

2 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC168 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

$币有 (Bi You) just launched on BSC 🔥 Narrative: Straight from He Yi's (Binance co-founder) slogan: “何必东奔西走,币安全部都有” — no need to chase, all coins are in Binance. Playing the Binance stock meta (7000+ tokens, 24/7 trading) with strong CN community hype. MC around $2.48M. Smart money in early around $630K. CN KOLs calling it "Binance life" narrative, expecting CZ/He Yi attention and potential Alpha push. CA: 0xe9337dd

1 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC97 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @KOLscopeVideo

🔶️ MULTIPLIER DETECTED: 9x+ @avrugs made 9x+ on ASTEROID. $1.08M ⮕ $9.85M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Advertise across KOLscope Today 🔥

1 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC88 viewsread 7 August 2026

Update: $ASTEROID pumped hard from ~$1.37M at call to $9.56M now (~7x). Chart went parabolic after launch, volume still strong. FOMO building on X with TST dev narrative. NFA

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @avrugs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,140,420 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“avrugs” (@avrugs), 1 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avrugs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.