Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Avropa Liqaları

Channel

Avropa Liqaları

@avropaliqalari13

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,133subscribers

-111 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164579953
TypeChannel
Username@avropaliqalari13
DescriptionSəhifəmizin kanalına xoş gəlmisiniz! ✅Reklam üçün əlaqə: https://t.me/ligareklam ✅Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/avropaliqalari2/ ✅İnsta: https://www.instagram.com/avropa_liqalari_official/
Created7 June 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/avropaliqalari13

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@avropaliqalari13/84988 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC@carchinews/293705 Aug 2026, 21:22 UTC1.00under a minute
@avropaliqalari13/85006 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC@carchinews/294017 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC1.0072 seconds
@avropaliqalari13/85015 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC@carchinews/294117 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC1.002 minutes
@avropaliqalari13/85021 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC@carchinews/294167 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@avropaliqalari13/85023 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC@carchinews/294207 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC1.00under a minute
@avropaliqalari13/85006 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC@cempionlarliqasi/150677 Aug 2026, 04:35 UTC1.0072 seconds
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@carchinews5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5–0)
@cempionlarliqasi6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (4–2)
@topliqalar9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@topliqalar (8–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 4 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 19 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @cempionlarliqasi. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

10,13110,26810,199.56 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,238 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,232 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,229 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,224 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,228 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,219 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,213 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,209 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,197 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,201 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,202 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,206 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,211 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,218 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,221 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,215 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,218 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,214 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,206 subscribers6 September 2026 — 10,211 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,209 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,268 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,261 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,241 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,242 subscribers25 September 2026 — 10,221 subscribers4 October 2026 — 10,207 subscribers8 October 2026 — 10,193 subscribers13 October 2026 — 10,178 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,172 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,167 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,166 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,160 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,157 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,171 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,163 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,158 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,154 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,142 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,147 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,156 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,153 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,149 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,147 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,145 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,143 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,137 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,135 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,144 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,137 subscribers6 November 2026 — 10,133 subscribers7 November 2026 — 10,131 subscribers8 November 2026 — 10,133 subscribers10,1336 August 20268 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 94 days, net -111. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,110–10,289 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:5510,133+2
7 Nov 2026, 07:2410,131-2
6 Nov 2026, 05:5510,133-4
5 Nov 2026, 04:1710,137-7
4 Nov 2026, 01:2110,144+9
3 Nov 2026, 03:3810,135-2
2 Nov 2026, 04:2010,137-6
1 Nov 2026, 04:5810,143-2
31 Oct 2026, 05:0910,145-2
30 Oct 2026, 01:4710,147-2
29 Oct 2026, 01:3910,149-4
28 Oct 2026, 00:5010,153-3
27 Oct 2026, 00:5610,156+9
26 Oct 2026, 00:3710,147+5
25 Oct 2026, 00:4910,142-12
23 Oct 2026, 23:2510,154-4
22 Oct 2026, 22:0810,158-5
21 Oct 2026, 19:2910,163-8
20 Oct 2026, 13:0510,171+14
19 Oct 2026, 10:5510,157first reading

Engagement

611 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.03%
avg views ÷ 10,133 subscribers
Avg views / post
814
154 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
155
of 611 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 151 of 154 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held611 (5 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total125,335
Reactions total2,237
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 22:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈54,500
Videos
≈25,400
Links
≈4,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 39m
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 201 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,528 reactions across 605 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,62648.8%
👍2,59422.5%
😁1,53713.3%
🔥6675.79%
💔3763.26%
😢3032.63%
😱1991.73%
😴1201.04%
🫡490.425%
😍280.243%
🤝170.147%
😭90.078%
🏆30.026%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 605 of the 611 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,528 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 611 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 155 posts held from the last 30 days (5.16%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 21:43 UTC163 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Vinicius yenə də futboldan kənar hərəkəti ilə diqqət çəkdi🙄

8 Nov 2026, 21:31 UTC217 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

🌟🌟66' Atletico Madrid 1-2 Barcelona ⚽️10' Giuliano Simeone (as. Julian Alvarez) (1-0) ⚽️ 45' Fermin Lopez (1-1) ⚽️ 66' Fermin Lopez (as. Lamine Yamal) (1-2)

❤9

8 Nov 2026, 20:52 UTC360 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

🌟🌟45' Atletico Madrid 1-1 Barcelona ⚽️10' Giuliano Simeone (as. Julian Alvarez) (1-0) ⚽️ 45' Fermin Lopez (1-1)

❤13💔1

8 Nov 2026, 20:27 UTC421 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

🌟🌟10' Atletico Madrid 1-0 Barcelona ⚽️10' Giuliano Simeone (1-0)

❤7😁2

8 Nov 2026, 19:29 UTC679 views13 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @topliqalarPhoto

Como klubu İnter klubuna qarşı son 7 oyunun 6-da məğlub olub: ❌ 2-0 ❌ 3-2 ❌ 3-4 🤝 0-0 ❌ 4-0 ❌ 0-2 ❌2-0

💔11❤1😁1

8 Nov 2026, 19:13 UTC697 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @topliqalarPhoto

İnter klubu evdə Como klubuna 2 cavabsız qolla qalib gəldi və hazırda 11 turdan 28 xalla 2-ci pillədədir. Como isə 23 xalla 5-cidir.

❤11😴2👍1

8 Nov 2026, 19:02 UTC732 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🔴 Manchester United klubunun eks baş məşqçisi kluba yenidən qayıtmağa hazırdır.

😁6😭2

8 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC795 views24 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @topliqalarPhoto

"Mən qazana bilmirəm, siz də qazana bilməyəcəksiniz" - deyən Manchester United klubu son saniyələrdə Aston Villa klubundan 1 xalı qopartdı.

❤23👍1

8 Nov 2026, 18:33 UTC675 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

⚽️Manchester United 4-4 Aston Villa

❤10

8 Nov 2026, 18:27 UTC669 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

⚽️Manchester United 3-4 Aston Villa

❤8

8 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC641 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

⚽️Crystal Palace 1-3 Liverpool

❤2

8 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC634 views2 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @canliyayimlarVideo

⚽️Crystal Palace 0-3 Liverpool

❤2

Showing the 12 most recent of 611 posts we hold for @avropaliqalari13. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@avropaliqalari13 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @avropaliqalari13 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
10 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

İNGİLİS DİLİ-PDF🇬🇧
@engilshpdf · 24,882
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 September 2026
✍🏻Tipik İqtisadçı-Ekspert📈
@eco_expert · 42,454
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Maraqlı.TV
@maraqli_tv · 109,997
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Azərbaycan Tələbələri
@azetelebe · 20,412
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 24 September 2026
SmartJob.az - iş elanları, vakansiyalar, təcrübə proqramları
@smartjobaz · 40,731
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
HƏRBİ XƏBƏRLƏR
@herbixeber · 50,015
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
ŞEDEVR +
@shedevrplus · 63,393
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 August 2026
BakuES
@baku_es · 180,360
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Insanoid
@insanoidcom · 19,862
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 September 2026
Azərbaycan Universitetləri
@uniaze · 25,257
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
Carçı
@carchinews · 28,451
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
AzVak - Azərbaycanda vakansiyalar: iş elanları / işlər / təcrübə proqramları / iş yeri
@azvakaz · 45,398
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
isayevios 🇦🇿
@isayevios · 23,630
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Operativ Məlumat Mərkəzi
@operativmm · 104,066
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Avropa Liqaları” (@avropaliqalari13), 10,133 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avropaliqalari13.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.