Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 41 days, net +153. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,481–1,770 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:17
1,668
-9
13 Sept 2026, 05:39
1,677
-9
9 Sept 2026, 06:21
1,686
-6
4 Sept 2026, 04:36
1,692
-19
31 Aug 2026, 11:35
1,711
-12
28 Aug 2026, 08:25
1,723
-14
24 Aug 2026, 22:25
1,737
+191
14 Aug 2026, 11:58
1,546
+20
11 Aug 2026, 02:16
1,526
+12
8 Aug 2026, 04:33
1,514
-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:46
1,515
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:31
1,515
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
9s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
820 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
282
34.4%
🔥
113
13.8%
🥰
90
11.0%
😁
89
10.9%
custom 5269217289214904434
80
9.76%
custom 5345905193005371012
54
6.59%
custom 5352734663452430904
36
4.39%
custom 5305338208987414176
23
2.80%
custom 5195417905549824502
8
0.976%
custom 5978671085363662341
7
0.854%
👍
7
0.854%
custom 5334530826820398405
6
0.732%
custom 5368621528436973317
6
0.732%
custom 5899999928884662753
6
0.732%
custom 5305655907718297711
5
0.61%
custom 5384559082625603477
4
0.488%
custom 5325783640590797379
3
0.366%
custom 5217608395250485583
1
0.122%
Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 820 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @avavoic_tg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Братцы, хочу вам рассказать одну историю.
Администрация это вообще цветочки, они хотя бы что-то могут менять, когда их тыкать. Но бывают люди, которых не исправить.
У нас была одна подписчица. Долгое время нормально комментировала посты, с нормальной позиции. Её когда-то деанонил Никбля, за что мы его банили у нас в чате. То есть с нашей стороны она была защищена. Всё было спокойно.
А потом после одного поста про …
Администрация сегодня добавила обновлённый редактор комнат.
Плюсы на бумаге хорошие: можно добавлять в избранное, покупать вещи не выходя из редактора и прочие удобства.
НО, как всегда НО, а именно, есть серьёзная проблема: как только игрок заходит в новый редактор 👉 игра начинает сильно лагать, виснуть и вылетать. Жалобы посыпались сразу. Раньше такого не было.
Хотели сделать лучше, а получили классику.
Админы, …
💥 [UA]Бандерівці в Аватарии это вообще нормально?
Начнем с того, что мы полностью порицаем наличие в игре клана [UA]Бандерівці.
Аватария находится в юрисдикции Российской Федерации. А в России пропаганда бандеровщины и связанной с ней символики запрещена законом как экстремистская. Точка.
Тем не менее, такое название спокойно висит в игре. Модераторы активно занимаются хоккеистами и аваденсерами, а на прямые наруш…
Доброй ночи, аватарцы! 👋
Наш канал растёт, и сейчас нам очень нужны новые люди, новые взгляды и новая кровь!
Объявляю небольшой набор помощников:
— Человек занимающийся чатом
— Редакторы (тексты, посты, новости)
— И просто все, кто готов помогать и реализовать себя, но не нашел платформы: идеи, рубрики, оформление, контент и т.д.
Если заинтересовало буду рад видеть вас в своем ЛС 👉 @VibrantHearts ))^^^ 🫥
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Опять «Рейх» отличился?
Ну что, участники клана «Рейх», особенно та самая девочка с ником [рейх]третий. Будете в очередной раз отрицать свою «просто шутку» и «это не то, о чём вы подумали»?
Ребята, Третий рейх — это не мем, не крутое название и не «эстетика». Это государство, которое уничтожило миллионы людей, включая граждан нашей страны. В России пропаганда нацистской символики и атрибутики прямо запрещена законо…
Друзья, мы уже увидели, что можно добиться по ситуации с Алиной Фрау.
Предлагаю вам собрать доказательства на сотрудников официальных проектов, все что у вас есть, скрины, пересылки и т.д. Подойдет все, что доказывает их вину
Присылайте АНОНИМНО в предложку 👇
https://t.me/voprosy?start=25zbv
Никита Павлов выделился 🤡
Буквально на днях нашему «дорогому» модератору Никите Павлову начислили уникальные женские вещи, которые есть только в женском гардеробе: ушки кролика (ободок) и тапочки кролика.
Для справки: такие вещи раньше выдавали только Глебу Ветеркову и Джеймсу (КМ). Даже Илья Райский в своё время, будучи одним из приближенных к Энн, просил их — и ему не дали. А Павлов вдруг резко выделился.
Вопрос…
Внимание ❕ Снова раздача на спавне
3500 жетонов + удобрения по 10 штук каждого вида
Это то, что сейчас очень нужно!
Участвовать проще некуда:
— Подпишись на AvaStore, Голос Народа, а также на Tropiboost
— Жми кнопку «Участвую!» (подписаться можно тут же)
Обязательно позови друзей и сделай репост — чем больше ТЫ ПРИГЛАСИШЬ, тем выше шанс сорвать приз!
Победителей объявим уже 22 июля! 🥇
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @avavoic_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аватария: Голос народа” (@avavoic_tg), 1,668 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avavoic_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
