Channel
@avato_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,261subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002396292923 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @avato_ai |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/avato_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,261 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 2,266 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 2,266 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
137 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 73 | 53.3% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 18.2% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 16.1% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 4.38% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 4.38% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 2.19% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.73% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.73% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 29 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @avato_ai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 November 2025 to 29 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Когда лучше менять работу, ехать в отпуск и запускать новый проект? ✨ Собрали новый астросервис, в котором можно не просто посмотреть натальную карту, а реально разбирать через нее свои текущие вопросы и ситуации. Что уже можно внутри 👇 1️⃣ Собрать натальную карту по дате рождения, времени, городу и другим параметрам 2️⃣ Посмотреть совместимость с партнером, друзьями, начальником и другими людьми 3️⃣ Понять, как…
❤7👍5🔥3
Спасибо за участие в конкурсе, друзья!! Стесняшкам, кто нам прислал в службу заботы - тоже бонусы добавим, не переживайте, только поменьше) Победителем выбираем @Loya_mos1 - естественно, за новогоднюю тематику) Друзья, кто фото выкладывал в чат, напишите пожалуйста в наш бот заботы - @ai_photo_support_bot @senjorita23 -2е место @Elena_794 - 3е место
❤10👍4🔥3🦄1😁1
Беспроигрышный розыгрыш!!! Друзья, а давайте в честь нашего юбилея - накидайте своих крутых, веселых, стильных, генераций, фото или видео! 🚨Закидывайте либо в комменты, либо в наш чатик🚨 Мы с Никитой отберем победителей, и наградим вас бонусными генерациями и моделями: 1️⃣ по 500 генераций или по 5 моделей на выбор, получат 3 победителя, кто займет 1е место! 2️⃣ по 250 генераций или по 3 модели на выбор, получат …
❤8🔥4👍2
Нам 1 год!!! Спасибо ВАМ!!! Да, вот так не заметно, и самое главное быстро - пролетело время. Год назад, мы познакомились, и задумали создать сервис для генерации фото, потому что у обоих была одна боль - нужно много собственных фоток, а времени ходить на фотостудии нет. У меня, так вообще грустная история по поводу почему я захотел создавать проект по нейрофотосессиям - за несколько месяцев до этого, выходила ста…
❤7⚡4🔥4
Даже не представляю, какие вершины доступны по-настоящему креативному человеку Или, как любитель собрал свой рекламный ролик за 1,5 часа... Всем привет. На связи Антон) Вы не смотрите, что мы тут редко что-то постим). Мы вносим правки в продукт зато!🔥 И вот думали, как бы, не размазывая на 10 постов, рассказать про то, что мы уже успели внедрить. Вот ролик, собранный мной за 1,5 часа, с помощью нашего любимого сер…
❤10👍4🔥3⚡2
Еще способ забрать бонусы: Мы тут немного затроили, и забыли показать еще простой способ - выйти в бонусы. Это через синюю кнопку внизу слева "Меню" (как на скрине).
🙏6❤4
Бесплатные бонусы 😋 Теперь ты можешь получить до 30 бонусных генераций! Для этого нужно зайти в бота, ввести /bonus и выполнить задания — подписаться на каналы, которые там есть. За каждый канал даётся 10 бесплатных генераций, которые сразу же можно использовать) Переходи @ai_photo_make_bot, чтобы сделать это 🌀
❤8👍4🔥2🥰1
Главное обновление! ⚡ 👉🏻 Теперь внутри Авато вы можете создавать трендовые ролики даже без использования аватара. Для создания видео без аватара — Veo 3.1 Fast и Quality и Sora2 обычный и Pro. Обе нейронки со звуком. (см. 1-3 скриншоты) P.S. Также ваши фото с аватаром тоже можно оживить с помощью новых трендовых моделей — доступны режимы Стандарт (Kling 2.1 — без звука) и ПРО (Veo 3.1 fast — со звуком). (см. 4-5 …
❤10🔥3🥰2
Продолжаем знакомство с обновлениями 😉 В режиме "без лица" можно просто создать фото без вашего аватара. Там есть режимы "Без аватара PRO" (тут просто продвинутая модель google image-4-ultra, которая была и раньше), и есть режим "Без аватара" — сюда мы добавили фотореалистичную wan-2.2 Вы можете написать запрос на русском — и мы автоматически его переведём на английский язык. А можете писать сразу на английском. …
❤9👍3🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @avato_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,015,522 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Авато 📸 ИИ-фотосессии” (@avato_ai), 2,261 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avato_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.