8 measurements spanning 17 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,895–3,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Aug 2026, 11:08
2,993
+5
20 Aug 2026, 11:25
2,988
+8
17 Aug 2026, 12:17
2,980
+18
14 Aug 2026, 13:05
2,962
+32
10 Aug 2026, 17:12
2,930
+20
7 Aug 2026, 21:04
2,910
+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:32
2,908
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:27
2,908
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 2,993 subscribers
Avg views / post
523
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (3 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
10,467
Reactions total
588
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
588 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
165
28.1%
🔥
146
24.8%
🤣
94
16.0%
💔
62
10.5%
🕊
50
8.50%
💘
41
6.97%
🥰
16
2.72%
👏
4
0.68%
👎
3
0.51%
🙏
3
0.51%
🗿
2
0.34%
😁
1
0.17%
😡
1
0.17%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐉 در جریان SDCC 2026، خالقان دنیای آواتار، فاش کردند که فیلم فرمانروای آتش زوکو زمانی پیشرفتهترین پروژهی استودیوی آواتار بود؛ اما در نهایت ساختش متوقف شد تا تمرکز استودیو روی فیلم آواتار آنگ: آخرین بادافزار قرار بگیرد.
🎙 طبق اطلاعات منتشرشده، این پروژه حتی به مرحلهی ضبط صدا هم رسیده بود و استیون یون قرار بود صداپیشهی زوکو باشد. همچنین برای نقش آزولا هم صداپیشهی جدیدی انتخاب شده بود.
🔥 داستان فیلم قرار بود حول …
با آواتار یانگچن به دنیای آواتار برگرد 🌪
یانگچن به دلیل تسلط بر بسیاری از تکنیکها و داشتن کنترل بسیار زیاد بر هر عنصر معروف بود. 🧘♀
🗣️ انگار میترسیدند در حضور او اشتباه کنند!
او میتوانست با کوچکترین حرکت ممکن، شاهکارهای شگفتانگیزی در کنترل عناصر از خود نشان دهد. ☠️
✅ رمان طلوعِ یانگچن رو میتونید با ترجمهی فارسی از طریق آیدی زیر تهیه کنید.
@Barfak_ads
وقتی آیرو آهنگ میخونه 🤣🎶
✅ کمیک داستان آیرو بعد از سریال ( چایساز و جایزهگیر )، با ترجمهی فارسی رو میتونید از طریق آیدی زیر تهیه کنید.
@Barfak_ads
👻 اما شاید اون غار فقط یه مخفیگاه نبود. توی خیلی از افسانههای باستانی، غارها مرز بین دنیای انسانها و دنیای ارواح به حساب میان؛ جاهایی که انرژی جهان توشون جریان داره و ارواح میتونن بدون دیده شدن رفتوآمد کنن. طبق این تئوری، کوزان یکی از همین ارواح سرگردان بوده؛ نه یه روح شرور، بلکه روحی که هر چند قرن یه بار ظاهر میشه تا تعادل رو به دنیا برگردونه. شاید به همین خاطر هیچکس نتونست گذشتهش رو پیدا کنه، هیچکس خانواده…
🔥 کوزان واقعاً کی بود؟
📜 توی تاریخ ملت آتش، یه داستان عجیب وجود داره؛ داستان پسری به اسم کوزان.
👤 هیچکس نمیدونه از کدوم شهر اومده بود. هیچ مدرکی از ثبتنامش توی مدرسه پیدا نشد و حتی بعد از ناپدید شدنش هم هیچ ردی ازش به جا نموند. اما همون مدت کوتاهی که اونجا بود، اتفاقاتی افتاد که هیچ توضیح منطقیای براشون وجود نداره.
🏫 کوزان بدون هیچ ترسی وارد یکی از سختگیرترین مدرسههای ملت آتش شد؛ جایی که حتی بچههای افسرها ه…
🔥 زیتو، آواتارِ ملت آتش و آواتارِ پیش از یانگچن بود. او در دورانی زندگی میکرد که بحرانهای عظیمی، ملت آتش را تا مرز نابودی پیش برده بودند. برای نجات سرزمینش، زیتو در خدمتِ فرمانروای آتش، یوسور، بهعنوان یک دیپلمات و حسابدار فعالیت کرد.
🏛 او در مقام مشاور اعظم، حکومتِ ملت آتش را بهشدت تقویت کرد، تعادل اقتصادی را دوباره برقرار ساخت و برنامههایی برای کمک به فقرا و نیازمندان راهاندازی کرد.
@Avatarbarfak
حالا که توجهتون جلب شد، رمان طلوع یانگچن رو ترجمه کردیم و میتونید با ترجمهی فارسی از آیدی زیر تهیه کنید
@barfak_ads
🤣26👎3🔥3🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @avatarbarfak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
⛔️ شما نظرسنجی بعدی رو انتخاب کنید، دوست دارید نظرسنجی بعدی درمورد چه موضوعی باشه؟
زیباترین کاراکتر دنیای آواتار؟26%
بهترین ویلن دنیای آواتار؟19%
بهترین آبافزار دنیای آواتار؟36%
بهترین سکانس انیمیشن افسانه کورا؟7%
هر چی خودت صلاح میدونی4%
پسرم و حق رای ندارم8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آواتار برفک | Avatar Barfak” (@avatarbarfak), 2,993 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avatarbarfak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.