Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клиника репродукции «Скандинавия АВА-ПЕТЕР»

Channel

Клиника репродукции «Скандинавия АВА-ПЕТЕР»

@avapeter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

2,133subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001649278791
TypeChannel
Username@avapeter
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avapeter

Growth

2,1312,1392,1357 August 2026 — 2,139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,136 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,137 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,138 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,131 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,132 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,133 subscribers2,1337 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,130–2,140 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 05:272,133+1
24 Aug 2026, 15:282,132+1
20 Aug 2026, 19:252,131-7
17 Aug 2026, 14:192,138+1
14 Aug 2026, 15:362,137+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:472,136-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:022,137-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:452,139first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.4%
avg views ÷ 2,133 subscribers
Avg views / post
243
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held6 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,460
Reactions total23
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 6 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«После переноса я почти не спала, плакала и все время ждала плохого. Наверное, поэтому ничего не получилось», — такая мысль добавляет к боли еще и чувство вины. ✨ Будто для успешного ЭКО нужно сохранять спокойствие, думать только о хорошем и ни на минуту не терять надежду. Но тревога во время лечения естественна. Процедуры, ожидание результатов, неизвестность, предыдущий опыт — все это может пугать и выматывать. 📎

2

6 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC218 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🧡 Когда заранее известно, из каких этапов состоит ЭКО и какие расходы предстоят, проходить этот путь немного спокойнее. В «Скандинавии АВА-ПЕТЕР» появились шесть новых пакетных программ ЭКО — от классического протокола до расширенных вариантов с ПГТ-А и финансовой защитой. ✨В карточках коротко рассказали, чем различаются программы и сколько они стоят. Подобрать подходящий вариант поможет репродуктолог на консультац

4

5 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC250 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 В процессе подготовки к ЭКО женщины внимательно прислушиваются к каждому новому ощущению. И это понятно: организм активно реагирует на гормональную стимуляцию, а в интернете легко найти истории, которые могут напугать. 🫧 Важно помнить: не каждый симптом — повод для тревоги. И как раз поэтому во время суперовуляции нужно быть на связи со своим репродуктологом. 📍 Какие ощущения считаются ожидаемыми Во время стиму

4

4 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC287 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы привыкли спрашивать наших врачей о протоколах, обследованиях и шансах на беременность. Но сегодня решили узнать их с другой стороны — через книги. 📕 Попросили репродуктологов назвать любимое произведение, рассказать, что лежит сейчас на прикроватной тумбочке, и посоветовать книгу пациентам. Получилась подборка, в которой есть классика, сказки, семейные тайны, истории о надежде и честный разговор о непростом пут

7

3 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Продолжаем наш блиц с репродуктологами 💙 Во второй части наши врачи снова отвечают на ваши самые частые вопросы и делятся важной информацией о репродуктивном здоровье. А если у вас остались вопросы — пишите их в комментариях. Возможно, именно ваш вопрос попадёт в следующие видео ✨

3

3 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC290 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

💗 Обычно выражение «человеческий фактор» звучит как причина ошибки. Но в ЭКО все ровно наоборот. Да, здесь есть самые современные технологии: высокоточные инкубаторы, системы непрерывного наблюдения за эмбрионами, искусственный интеллект, который помогает анализировать огромный объем данных. И все же главное решение по-прежнему принимает человек. Почему это хорошо? Потому что за каждым эмбрионом стоят: ✨ история

3

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @avapeter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клиника репродукции «Скандинавия АВА-ПЕТЕР»” (@avapeter), 2,133 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avapeter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.