Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐™ฐ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐šŸ๐šŠ ๐™ฝ๐šŠ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐š’๐š•๐š–๐š•๐šŠ๐š› ๐™ฐ๐š”๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š–๐š’๐šข๐šŠ๐šœ๐š’

Channel

๐™ฐ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐šŸ๐šŠ ๐™ฝ๐šŠ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐š’๐š•๐š–๐š•๐šŠ๐š› ๐™ฐ๐š”๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š–๐š’๐šข๐šŠ๐šœ๐š’

@avan_ilmlar

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

5,010subscribers

+65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166319891
TypeChannel
Username@avan_ilmlar
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/avan_ilmlar

Growth

4,9415,0104,975.56 August 2026 โ€” 4,945 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 4,941 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 4,951 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 5,001 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 5,010 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 4,931โ€“5,020 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:275,010+9
13 Aug 2026, 09:455,001+50
10 Aug 2026, 10:414,951+10
7 Aug 2026, 04:224,941-4
6 Aug 2026, 19:024,945first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
28.2%
avg views รท 5,010 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.51%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held30 (1 August 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total42,317
Reactions total640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

640 reactions across 30 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
customย 577860190087414320120431.9%
customย 578054648597211311614222.2%
customย 600793514138770437913120.5%
customย 589763273618463847112118.9%
customย 5780585316771436344396.09%
customย 578076430953349777230.469%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id โ€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegramโ€™s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 640reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for ยท 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @avan_ilmlar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:05 UTC210 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Sunnatlarni mahkam tutish haqida ๐Ÿ“š Risolatul mustarshidiyn Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 60079351413877043796

11 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC759 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Nima uchun fiqh kitoblari ibodatdan boshlanadi? ๐Ÿ“š Muxtasorul Quduriy kitobi Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 57786019008741432016customย 58976327361846384715customย 57805464859721131163

10 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC958 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Bu hadisni ulamolar din asosi ekaniga ijmo qilganlar ๐Ÿ“š Qirq hadis sharhi darslari Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 57805464859721131166customย 57786019008741432014customย 60079351413877043794

10 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTCโ‰ˆ1,090 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ“š Boshlangโ€™ich Hadis Ilmi Kursi ฤฐlm tahsil qilish dasturimiz bo'yicha (hadis matni) yo'nalishida Qirq hadis sharhi darslarini taqdim qildik. Endi esa hadisning sanadi bo'yicha yangi ilmga kirishamiz. Hadisning sanadiga tegishli mavzularni nazariy suratda o'rganadigan ilmga "mustalahul hadis" ilmi deyiladi. Mustalahul hadisdan Bayquniyya nazmiga yozilgan ixcham va go'zal sharh Shayx Hasan Mashshot rahimahullohing "Atโ€ฆ

customย 578054648597211311611customย 57786019008741432017customย 60079351413877043797

9 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,250 views73 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ“š ILM IZLAYOTGANLAR UCHUN FOYDALI MANBA Bugun ilm olish uchun imkoniyatlar koโ€˜p. Ammo ishonchli manbalarni topish, darslarni tartibli ravishda oโ€˜rganish va kerakli ilmni bir joydan izlash har doim ham oson emas. Shu ehtiyojdan kelib chiqib, Aqliy va Naqliy Ilmlar Akademiyasi onlayn ilm olishni istaganlar uchun foydali platformalardan birini taqdim etmoqda. Platformada turli ilmiy yoโ€˜nalishlarga oid onlayn kurs va โ€ฆ

customย 578054648597211311636customย 589763273618463847118customย 577860190087414320112customย 60079351413877043796customย 57805853167714363441

9 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTCโ‰ˆ1,100 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Sirotul mustaqim Allohโฌ›๏ธ ning kalomida ๐Ÿ“š Risolatul mustarshidiyn Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 60079351413877043796customย 58976327361846384715customย 57805464859721131164customย 57805853167714363441

8 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTCโ‰ˆ1,190 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Amalida salomat moสปmin Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 60079351413877043798customย 57786019008741432015customย 58976327361846384713

8 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTCโ‰ˆ1,270 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Farz soสปzining lugสปaviy va sharสผiy maสผnosi ๐Ÿ“š Muxtasorul Quduriy kitobi Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 57805853167714363447customย 57786019008741432012customย 58976327361846384712

7 Aug 2026, 11:28 UTCโ‰ˆ1,420 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbvLjVYMO3X/?igsh=MXJ5ejNsYXhxcDhiNQ==

customย 57805464859721131167customย 57786019008741432014customย 58976327361846384714

7 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTCโ‰ˆ1,600 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

Ilm ahllarining ixtilofli masalalarni ommaga yetkazishdagi vazifalari ๐Ÿ“š Qirq hadis sharhi darslari Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 589763273618463847110customย 57786019008741432014customย 57805464859721131162

6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTCโ‰ˆ2,050 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ“š Boshlangโ€™ich Hadis Ilmi Kursi ฤฐlm tahsil qilish dasturimiz bo'yicha (hadis matni) yo'nalishida Qirq hadis sharhi darslarini taqdim qildik. Endi esa hadisning sanadi bo'yicha yangi ilmga kirishamiz. Hadisning sanadiga tegishli mavzularni nazariy suratda o'rganadigan ilmga "mustalahul hadis" ilmi deyiladi. Mustalahul hadisdan Bayquniyya nazmiga yozilgan ixcham va go'zal sharh Shayx Hasan Mashshot rahimahullohing "Atโ€ฆ

customย 577860190087414320114customย 589763273618463847113customย 600793514138770437911

6 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTCโ‰ˆ1,370 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Moสปmin kishiga eslatma Ustoz Rahmatulloh Hanafiy ๐Ÿ•Š @Avan_ilmlar

customย 60079351413877043798customย 57786019008741432017customย 58976327361846384716

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @avan_ilmlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTCAnonymous Poll304 voters

Bir savolning javobi qiziqtiryabdi! ฤฐxtiyorni tugatsak Hidoyadan dars boshlasakmikin?! Sizlar nima deysizlar, Hidoyami yoki Sharhul viqoyami?

  1. Hidoya52%
  2. Sharhul viqoya56%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTCAnonymous Poll205 voters

Bir zor ish bor, keyin aytaman. "Istivo ma'lum" kitobidan dars gilgandik, xabaringiz bo'lganmi shundan?

  1. Ha24%
  2. Yo'q69%
  3. Ha, darsida ham qatnashgandim5%
  4. Kitobini o'zim o'qiganman3%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTCAnonymous Poll255 voters

Odamlar bilan aloqangiz uzilganida koโ€™radigan oxirgi qiyofa โ€” aslida ularning ilk kundanoq yashirib kelgan haqiqiy qiyofasidir.

  1. To'g'ri62%
  2. Xato7%
  3. Bo'lishi mumkin35%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 667,249 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ุงู„ู†ุญูˆ ุงู„ู…ููŠูŽุณู‘ูŽุฑ ู„ุฎุงู„ุฏ ุนุจุฏ ุงู„ุนุฒูŠุฒ
@khaledabdelazizm ยท 106,130
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here โ€” alongside 80 others โ€” read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐™ฐ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐šŸ๐šŠ ๐™ฝ๐šŠ๐šš๐š•๐š’๐šข ๐š’๐š•๐š–๐š•๐šŠ๐š› ๐™ฐ๐š”๐šŠ๐š๐šŽ๐š–๐š’๐šข๐šŠ๐šœ๐š’โ€ (@avan_ilmlar), 5,010 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avan_ilmlar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.