Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,638–1,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:19
1,639
-1
13 Sept 2026, 10:38
1,640
+1
4 Sept 2026, 22:20
1,639
-4
29 Aug 2026, 08:55
1,643
+1
28 Aug 2026, 13:15
1,642
no change
28 Aug 2026, 13:01
1,642
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
468 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💔
197
42.1%
❤
140
29.9%
🤔
53
11.3%
👍
43
9.19%
💋
15
3.21%
😢
14
2.99%
👏
6
1.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2023 to 22 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
آنان که برخاستند، دل به دریا سپرده بودند؛ نه در پی نام و نه در سودای سیم و زر، که در آرزوی ایرانی آزاد و آباد از شرافتی که از جاویدنامان به یادگار مانده بود. هر نگاهشان شرارهای از عزم، و هر سخنشان آوازی از راستی بود. دست مشت کرده داشتند، اما دل در گرو داد.
چون بانگ برآمد، زمین به هیبت دانشجویان بلرزید
جوانی که با راستی یار بود
دلش پاک و دستش به پیکار بود
دلیرانِ جوان چون به میدان شدند
ز بانگِ سنان، کوه لرزان شدند…
سلام دوستان خداقوت
از دوستان قدیمی که این کانال رو دارن تقاضا دارم این پیام منو به دانشجو های فعلی برسونن یه سری مسائلی که تو دوران خودمون تجربش کردیم رو میخام بهتون بگم
ببینید دوستان نمیدونم خوشبختانه یا متاسفانه طرف روبروی شما در این درگیری ها و بحث ها لوزر ترین ادم هایی هستن که میتونید تو زندگیتون ببینید پس ازشون توقع شرف و این چیزا نداشته باشید
اولین چیز و مهم ترین چیز اگر به هر دلیلی داخل دانشگاه خارج دانشگاه یا…
موهای کوتاه نقریبا مشکی و قد متوسط بیشتر تیپات مشکیه و تایپ خاصی داری و رشته مهندسی مکانیک اسم مستعار داری اول اسمتم ص خیلی مراقب خودت باش :)
@autcrush
دختر خانومی ک با مدنی اخلاق داری، موهات کوتاه و روز ۳۰ اردیبهشت لباس قرمز پوشیده بودی یه گردنبند رنگین کمون داشتی.
تو رسما خوشگلترین سازه ای هستی که تو زندگیم دیدم.
پاشو بیا ایدیمو از ادمین بگیر بریم بیرون🥰
@autcrush
دختر خانوم چادری که چشمای آبی داشتی. روسری قرمز و صورتی دوشنبه ۲۵ اردیبهشت ساعت ۱۳ جلوی آسانسور وسط ابوریحان وایستاده بودی.
اگر مجردی بیا بریم سر خونه زندگیمون🫠🫠
@autcrush
👍16🤔9💋2💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @autcrush. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
امیرکبیریها @amirkabiriha · 35,458 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
SUPERNOOVA™ @SuperNoova · 43,738 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Amirkabir crush” (@autcrush), 1,639 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/autcrush.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
