4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,991–4,002 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 21:54
3,992
-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:56
3,998
-3
7 Aug 2026, 01:00
4,001
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:54
4,001
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.45%
avg views ÷ 3,992 subscribers
Avg views / post
377
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
10 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
3,774
Reactions total
58
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
58 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
30
51.7%
❤
14
24.1%
🔥
12
20.7%
👏
2
3.45%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 58reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Главное за неделю от Атомного ИТ
➡️ Владимир Путин подписал закон о совершенствовании патентной охраны технических решений в сфере ИТ. Изменения в Гражданском кодексе РФ распространяют патентную защиту на устройства, которые выполняют автоматизированную обработку информации на основе алгоритмов. Это позволит ИТ-компаниям увеличивать капитализацию за счет нематериальных активов, стимулировать патентную активность раз…
Пятничная задача в Атомном ИT ⬇️
В Java List<?> выглядит почти как обычный список, но стоит попробовать с ним поработать, начинаются нюансы.
Посмотрите на код:
import java.util.*;
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<?> list = new ArrayList<String>();
list.add(null); // 1
list.add("Hello"); // 2
Object obj = list.get(0);…
Цифровая грамотность и кибергигиена: «Росатом» масштабирует корпоративные практики
6 августа прошла закрытая встреча руководства Экспертного совета по цифровой грамотности и кибергигиене при АНО «Цифровая экономика». Участники обсудили синхронизацию приоритетов отрасли по ИИ и цифровой грамотности, ключевые кейсы применения нейросетей в компаниях, необходимые компетенции для развития отрасли и планы работы на 3 квар…
«Росатом» сертифицировал первую продукцию для ТЭК в системе «КИИ-Серт»
В системе добровольной сертификации «КИИ-Серт», созданной «Росатомом», прошел сертификацию первый программно-аппаратный комплекс (ПАК) для нефтегазовой отрасли. Это первый шаг по расширению географии применения «КИИ-Серт»: теперь ее механизмы работают и на объектах критической информационной инфраструктуры топливно-энергетического комплекса.
Раб…
«Росатом» заменит ручной контроль компьютерным зрением
АО «ТВЭЛ» автоматизирует контроль качества на своих ключевых предприятиях. Для внедрения искусственного интеллекта привлекаются отечественные разработчики программно-аппаратных комплексов (ПАК) — соответствующий запрос разместила структура «Росатом» АО «Проминн».
Специфика атомного машиностроения не допускает компромиссов: системы компьютерного зрения будут отс…
#КодовыйСловарь в Атомном ИТ
Переводим технические термины на понятный язык, чтобы разбираться в ИТ-процессах было проще. Сегодня поговорим о цифровых двойниках.
Представьте себе точную интерактивную модель завода, где можно увидеть каждую деталь, каждый датчик и каждый процесс в реальном времени. Здесь можно протестировать любые сценарии, отключить виртуальный насос или изменить параметры работы, не рискуя реальны…
Как сделать шаг к карьере вашей мечты
Кейс-лаборатория «Машинное обучение (ML + Python)» — отличный шанс попасть на молодежный фестиваль «ИТ КоР 5.0 Новый код атомной отрасли» и сделать уверенный шаг в карьеру. Мероприятие пройдет 28-30 октября в Нижнем Новгороде в «Академии МАЯК».
Как попасть на «ИТ КоР 5.0»?
Пройти онлайн-кейслаб по одному из ИТ-направлений, решить реальные отраслевые задачи вместе с экспертами …
Билет на «ИТ КоР 5.0»: ваш шанс попасть на молодежный ИТ-фестиваль!
Хотите не просто учиться, а сразу проверить свои силы на реальных задачах атомной отрасли? Присоединяйтесь к онлайн-кейслабам по ключевым ИТ-направлениям.
Для лучших участников онлайн-кейслабы — это прямой путь на молодежный фестиваль «ИТ КоР 5.0. Новый код атомной отрасли», который пройдет 29–30 октября в Нижнем Новгороде, в «Академии МАЯК» им. А.…
Молодежный фестиваль «ИТ КоР 5.0 Новый код атомной отрасли» ждет вас!
Кейс-лаборатория «Веб-разработка JS» — ваш шанс попасть на молодежный фестиваль «ИТ КоР 5.0 Новый код атомной отрасли» и сделать уверенный шаг в карьеру.
Как попасть на «ИТ КоР 5.0»?
Пройти онлайн-кейслаб по одному из ИТ-направлений, решить реальные отраслевые задачи вместе с экспертами «Росатома» и показать свои навыки. Лучшие участники получат…
#ЦифровойПрогноз от Атомного ИТ на август
Август — последний месяц лета, время подведения итогов. Летняя расслабленность постепенно уступает место рабочей собранности, а текущие проекты требуют завершения начатых задач.
В рубрике #ЦифровойПрогноз публикуем три предсказания на август, которые помогут вам плавно перейти от летнего режима к осенней продуктивности.
Выбирайте один из трех символов на картинке, открывай…
👍2❤1🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @atomic_it. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 328,205 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Атомный ИТ” (@atomic_it), 3,992 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atomic_it.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.