2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114–116 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Nov 2026, 23:59
115
no change
3 Nov 2026, 14:22
115
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
196.9%
avg views ÷ 115 subscribers
Avg views / post
226
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held
20 (23 September 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total
2,264
Reactions total
131
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
29s
Average length
29s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
313 reactions across 20 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
54
17.3%
custom 5852839925254198195
39
12.5%
custom 6008122363307102604
26
8.31%
custom 5780494559817504144
24
7.67%
🕊
16
5.11%
custom 5850264211891950364
13
4.15%
custom 5951746704184185362
10
3.19%
custom 6008346388801262073
10
3.19%
💯
10
3.19%
🎉
8
2.56%
🏆
8
2.56%
custom 5388858593996990777
7
2.24%
❤🔥
6
1.92%
👍
6
1.92%
custom 5832281389982029630
5
1.60%
custom 5961052171737766972
5
1.60%
custom 6003743614084060798
5
1.60%
🍓
5
1.60%
custom 5850415463460246527
4
1.28%
custom 5893422710456850946
4
1.28%
20 further kinds
48
15.3%
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎥 الحلقة الرابعة:
اقطع الطريق⛔️
إذا كنت جادًّا في التَّوبة، فلا يكفي أن تقول:⬇
«لن أعود»
🔊 وأنت ما زلت تحتفظ بكل الأبواب التي تعيدك.
محادثة قديمة…
حساب تراقبه…
صور ورسائل تعيد فتح المشاعر…
انتظار ظهور الشخص «متصل الآن»…
أنت تعرف الباب الذي تدخل منه المعصية…
فأغلقه ✖️
قال🤲
﴿وَالَّذِينَ جَاهَدُوا فِينَا لَنَهْدِيَنَّهُمْ سُبُلَنَا﴾
التَّوبة ليست كلمة نقولها، بل قرار يتبعه فعل،
لا تنتظر أن يصبح ترك الحرام سهلً…
🎥 الحلقة الثالثة:
⚠️ لا تـقـل:
« لا أستطيع»
«أنا تعلّقت… ما بقدر أترك.»
«لو ابتعدت عنه رح أتعب.»
«أنا أحبه، ماذا أفعل؟»
💎 اسـمـعـهـا جيِّدًا:
التَّعلُّق ليس عذرًا للاستمرار في الحرام.
قد تحبُّ شخصًا، وقد تشتاق إليه، لكن ليس كلُّ ما يحبّه القلب يكون خيرًا له.
قال 🤲
➿وَعَسَىٰ أَن تَكْرَهُوا شَيْئًا وَهُوَ خَيْرٌ لَّكُمْ ۖ وَعَسَىٰ أَن تُحِبُّوا شَيْئًا وَهُوَ شَرٌّ لَّكُمْ ۗ وَاللَّهُ يَعْلَمُ وَأَنتُمْ لَا تَعْلَ…
🎥 الـحَـلَـقـة الأولـىٰ:
⚠️ اِصحَ قبل أن تخسر قلبك،
📌إلى من يفتح واتساب كل ليلة وينتظر رسالة شخصٍ تعلّق به…
📌إلى من يقول:
نحن فقط نتحدث… لم نفعل شيئًا!...
نحن نحبُّ بعضنا...
سنتزوَّج مستقبلًا...
تــوقَّــف ⛔️
هل هذه العلاقة فعلًا حب❔
أم أنك أعطيت المعصية اسمًا أجمل حتى تستطيع الاستمرار❔
المشكلة ليست في رسالة فقط… بل في قلبٍ يتعلّق بغير الله، ووقتٍ يُهدر، وعبادةٍ تتشتت، وخلوةٍ لا يراك فيها أحد،
🎊 لــڪَـنَّ الـلَّ…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atharalabren. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أَثَࢪُ العَابِࢪِين” (@atharalabren), 115 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atharalabren.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
