Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مجالس أثرية

Channel

مجالس أثرية

@athar135

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,394subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002070357391
TypeChannel
Username@athar135
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded19 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/athar135

Growth

1,3801,3941,38719 August 2026 — 1,380 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,380 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,388 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,390 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,388 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,394 subscribers19 August 202631 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 12 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,378–1,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 23:471,394+6
28 Aug 2026, 13:481,388-2
25 Aug 2026, 05:431,390+2
22 Aug 2026, 14:021,388+8
19 Aug 2026, 15:131,380no change
19 Aug 2026, 14:301,380first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.2%
avg views ÷ 1,394 subscribers
Avg views / post
351
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,405
Reactions total50
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

246 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍11747.6%
💯4417.9%
4217.1%
🤝2510.2%
👌187.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC279 views12 reactionsread 19 August 2026

أيوصف بالإسلام من كان مشركًا ويوصف بالاشراك من كان مسلما قالها ابن سحمان

👍6💯3👌21

8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC282 views18 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @S9nnah

السلام عليكم ورحمة الـلّٰــه وبركاته. ان شاء الـلّٰــه تعالى نلقاكم هذه الليلة لقراءة كتاب: 📚 "البيان المبدي لشناعة القول المجدي للشيخ سليمان بن سحمان🌿. 🕒 عند الساعة: التاسعة والنصف مساءً بتوقيت مكة. بحول الـلّٰــه تعالى. قَنـٰاةُ السُّنَّـة والـحَدِيـث 📖 ،..

👍9💯3🤝32👌1

4 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC440 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @S9nnah

بسم الـلّٰــه

👍7💯2🤝1

4 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC404 views10 reactionsread 19 August 2026
Forwarded from @S9nnah

السلام عليكم ورحمة الـلّٰــه وبركاته. نلقاكم ان شاء الـلّٰــه تعالى على الموعد لقراءة كتاب: 📚 "فضل أصحاب الحديث" للحافظ الضياء المقدسي🌿. 🕒 عند الساعة: الواحدة والنصف ظهرا بتوقيت مكة. بحول الـلّٰــه تعالى. قَنـٰاةُ السُّنَّـة والـحَدِيـث 📖 ،..

👍7💯2🤝1

14 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC787 views16 reactionsread 19 August 2026

لا يزداد الا بعدا فعلا صاحب الجدل لا يفلح في مناظرة محمد بن شمس الدين التي قبل ايام لأحد الملاحدة يسب النبي امامه ولا يتكلم ثم لما تكلم قال للملحد قل عدم الصدق ولا تقل كذب! يعلم الملحد كيف يسب نبينا صلى الله علي وسلم! اي سفه أكثر من سفه هؤلاء الملاعين؟

👍74💯3👌2

2 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC945 views18 reactionsread 19 August 2026

مسجد من أول يوم بني على القبور والشرك ومحادة دين الله والى اليوم هو منبر للزنادقة

👍11💯43

2 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC918 views17 reactionsread 19 August 2026

وأكثر أهل الأزهر الغير الشريف ملاحدة

👍10💯43

2 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC903 views17 reactionsread 19 August 2026

أحمد معبد جهمي كافر ولا ينفعه ما يمدحه به البعض من الانصاف و... فكيف وهو ليس فيه تلك الصفات بل يرد على السلفيين ويذمهم بكلام قبيح

👍103🤝3💯1

10 Jun 2026, 23:43 UTC≈1,280 views15 reactionsread 19 August 2026

من أراد أن يعرف حال أهل زماننا مع أهل البدع فلينظر تعاملهم مع هادم الدين الألباني المرجئ الجهمي الذي يقول الله لا يجلس على العرش ويقول لفظي بالقرآن مخلوق وطعن في الامام أحمد والدارمي وابن بطة والبربهاري ومحمد بن عبد الوهاب وغيرهم ومع ذالك يعظم ويجعل إمام للسلفية ويصير محنة

👍75💯3

3 Jun 2026, 19:34 UTC≈1,380 views7 reactionsread 19 August 2026

هلك محمد سعيد منقارة الماتريدي الحنفي المشرك

👍4👌21

2 Jun 2026, 19:27 UTC≈1,450 views12 reactionsread 19 August 2026

البعض تسمعه يقول فلان جزاه الله خيرا اختصر الكتاب الفلاني او جرده من الاسانيد فبقي مختصره وانتفع به... هو لو لم يختصره ونسخه كما هو لبقي الأصل... فاختصاره كان سبب لذهاب الكتاب لا لبقائه او ان فلانا الجهمي ابقى لنا كثير من كتب السلف في مؤلفاته وهو مذكور في ترجمته انه كان يسرق الكتب ياتيه الكتاب من كتب السلف فينقل منه ثم يتلفه ويبقي كتابه فاحرصوا اكرمكم الله على الاهتمام بكتب السلف المسندة التي كتبها أهل السنة واحياءها

👍8💯31

26 May 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,460 views9 reactionsread 19 August 2026

قَالَ الْحَسَنُ بْنُ صَالِحٍ : كُنَّا إِذَا أَرَدْنَا أَنْ نَكْتُبَ عَنِ الرَّجُلِ سَأَلْنَا عَنْهُ، حَتَّى يُقَالَ لَنَا : أَتُرِيدُونَ أَنْ تُزَوِّجُوهُ.

5👍2💯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @athar135. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

معهد العلامة ابن عثيمين وطلابه - القناة العامة
@Uthaimeen_Institute · 42,187
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 August 2026
فوائد علمية للشيخ د. عبد المحسن القاسم
@FawaidAlQasim · 75,806
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 19 August 2026
مُسليات اليحيى
@moslyati_yhya · 36,996
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مجالس أثرية” (@athar135), 1,394 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/athar135.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.