Channel
@ata_announcement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4,374subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001253638674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ata_announcement |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ata_announcement |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 4,374 | -9 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 4,383 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 4,391 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 4,391 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ERC-8004 formalizes how agents build trust. Automata provides the substrate for it Attestation → Trust → Relay → Execution From hardware-backed identity to onchain verification, we build a world where agents don’t ask for trust. They'll prove it, continuously, in hardware Article: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/1981360263199658095 Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2040417088800756122
Psyched to team up with @nuconstruct to bring end-to-end verifiability to TOOL with Automata Linux Every node is cryptographically bound to hardware and attested onchain for a neutral execution environment and private orderflow Coordination backed by proofs, not trust Article: https://blog.ata.network/verifiable-private-and-decentralized-orderflow-processing-with-automata-linux-and-tool-daf0c345e73c Tweet: https:…
Attested. Verifiable. Machine-ready. Agents are becoming the interface to onchain systems. Automata is building for that shift. Introducing our 2026 roadmap for The Year of the Agent: Attestation → Trust → Relay → Execution Article: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2037458749976166410 Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2037461963270430946
We're bringing @teamxata to the world. Agentic execution for onchain perpetuals. Trade an idea once and watch it happen across @HyperliquidX @Aster_DEX @Lighter_xyz Engineered for agents with a machine trading API. Built for humans with XATA Copilot. Turn thought into trade: Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2036451183108440347
2025 saw the rise of verifiable machines. This year marked key milestones in establishing Automata as the machine trust layer for provable execution across different Web3 verticals. Looking back at our top highlights ↓ Article: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2006358308026814873 Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2006358434615296127
Silent failures are the most dangerous for DCAP attestation. No alerts or errors, and all it takes is one expired collateral file. Maintain the trust chain automatically with the DCAP Dashboard, where all collateral is continuously fetched to keep quote verification intact. Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2003450617789055304
The trust chain for Intel SGX and TDX is complex: ▶️︎ Collaterals rotate and expire regularly ▶️︎ Missing or outdated collateral causes silent failures Automata's DCAP Dashboard automates collateral upkeep to ensure quotes remain verifiable and the chain remains intact. Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2003088206301216972
Learn more about our DCAP Dashboard: https://docs.ata.network/dcap-dashboard/introduction Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2003088218569445720
On @ethereum, there is a disconnect between: ▶️︎ "What we see" (source code on GitHub) ▶️︎ "What we run" (executable code onchain) Proof of Build addresses this air gap by verifying Sigstore bundles onchain with the support of zkVM guest programs. Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/2001638618742563217
Stablecoin payments today face fragmented liquidity and unpredictable FX rates. @tempo's enshrined DEX enables native stablecoin routing, so payments are settled cleanly across the preferred token by each party. Tweet: https://x.com/1rpc_/status/1999101937158140331
The payments-first blockchain is now live on 1RPC. Protect your metadata while on @tempo's testnet with our privacy-preserving endpoint (only with our Developer Plans): 1rpc.io Tweet: https://x.com/1rpc_/status/1998739509639581878
congrats to @matthuang and entire @tempo team for rollout of testnet Tempo testnet support now live on day 1 with Automata's DCAP Attestation Let's go: https://github.com/automata-network/automata-dcap-attestation/tree/main/rust-crates/libraries/network-registry/deployment/current/42429 Tweet: https://x.com/AutomataNetwork/status/1998704531459420423
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ata_announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ata_announcement named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Automata Network Announcement” (@ata_announcement), 4,374 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ata_announcement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.